• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rethinking biosafety in research on potential pandemic pathogens.重新思考潜在大流行病原体研究中的生物安全问题。
mBio. 2012 Oct 9;3(5):e00360-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00360-12.
2
The H5N1 moratorium controversy and debate.H5N1暂停令的争议与辩论。
mBio. 2012 Nov 1;3(5):e00379-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00379-12.
3
The pause on Avian H5N1 influenza virus transmission research should be ended.应终止禽流感 H5N1 病毒传播研究的暂停。
mBio. 2012 Nov 1;3(5):e00358-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00358-12.
4
Biocontainment in gain-of-function infectious disease research.功能获得性传染病研究中的生物遏制。
mBio. 2012 Oct 9;3(5):e00290-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00290-12.
5
Research on highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus: the way forward.高致病性 H5N1 流感病毒研究:前进之路。
mBio. 2012 Nov 1;3(5):e00359-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00359-12.
6
The lessons of Asilomar and the H5N1 "affair".阿西洛马会议和 H5N1“事件”的教训。
mBio. 2012 Oct 9;3(5):e00354-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00354-12.
7
Biosafety considerations of mammalian-transmissible H5N1 influenza.哺乳动物传播的 H5N1 流感的生物安全考虑因素。
mBio. 2012 Mar 6;3(2):e00043-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00043-12. Print 2012.
8
EcoHealth and the influenza A/H5N1 dual use issue.生态健康与甲型H5N1流感的两用问题。
Ecohealth. 2012 Mar;9(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s10393-012-0768-4. Epub 2012 May 11.
9
Public health and biosecurity. H5N1 debates: hung up on the wrong questions.公共卫生与生物安全。H5N1 辩论:纠结于错误的问题。
Science. 2012 Feb 17;335(6070):799-801. doi: 10.1126/science.1219066. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
10
Working safely with H5N1 viruses.安全操作 H5N1 病毒。
mBio. 2012 Mar 6;3(2):e00049-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00049-12. Print 2012.

引用本文的文献

1
Balancing Innovation and Safety: Frameworks and Considerations for the Governance of Dual-Use Research of Concern and Potential Pandemic Pathogens.平衡创新与安全:关注两用研究及潜在大流行病原体治理的框架与考量
Appl Biosaf. 2025 Jun 5;30(2):69-78. doi: 10.1089/apb.2024.0033. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Neglected Human Risk Factors Determining Sustainable Health by Microbial Causes: Individual Versus Social Conducts, Scientific Versus Stultified Behaviour.被忽视的由微生物原因决定可持续健康的人类风险因素:个体行为与社会行为、科学行为与僵化行为
Microb Biotechnol. 2025 Feb;18(2):e70097. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70097.
3
Deep mutational scanning of H5 hemagglutinin to inform influenza virus surveillance.深度突变扫描 H5 血凝素以提供流感病毒监测信息。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Nov 12;22(11):e3002916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002916. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Bridging biosafety and biosecurity gaps: DURC and ePPP policy insights from U.S. institutions.弥合生物安全与生物安保差距:来自美国机构的两用研究关注(DURC)和公私合作计划(ePPP)政策见解
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Sep 25;12:1476527. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1476527. eCollection 2024.
5
Biosafety, biosecurity, and bioethics.生物安全、生物安保和生物伦理。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2024 Jun;42(1):137-167. doi: 10.1007/s40592-024-00204-3. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
6
Biological Containment for African Swine Fever (ASF) Laboratories and Animal Facilities: The Italian Challenge in Bridging the Present Regulatory Gap and Enhancing Biosafety and Biosecurity Measures.非洲猪瘟(ASF)实验室及动物设施的生物遏制:意大利在弥合当前监管差距及加强生物安全和生物安保措施方面面临的挑战。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;14(3):454. doi: 10.3390/ani14030454.
7
Integrating evolutionary aspects into dual-use discussion: the cases of influenza virus and enterohemorrhagic .将进化因素纳入两用性讨论:流感病毒和肠出血性大肠杆菌的案例
Evol Med Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;9(1):383-392. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoab034. eCollection 2021.
8
A machine learning toolkit for genetic engineering attribution to facilitate biosecurity.用于遗传工程归因的机器学习工具包,以促进生物安保。
Nat Commun. 2020 Dec 8;11(1):6293. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19612-0.
9
Rethinking Gain-of-Function Experiments in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic.重新思考 COVID-19 大流行背景下的功能获得性实验。
mBio. 2020 Aug 7;11(4):e01868-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01868-20.
10
Public awareness, acceptability and risk perception about infectious diseases dual-use research of concern: a cross-sectional survey.公众对关注的传染病双重用途研究的认识、可接受性和风险感知:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e029134. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029134.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution, safety, and highly pathogenic influenza viruses.进化、安全性和高致病性流感病毒。
Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1529-31. doi: 10.1126/science.1223204.
2
Benefits and risks of influenza research: lessons learned.流感研究的利弊:经验教训。
Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1522-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1224305.
3
Comment on "Seroevidence for H5N1 influenza infections in humans: meta-analysis".评论“人类中 H5N1 流感感染的血清学证据:荟萃分析”。
Science. 2012 Jun 22;336(6088):1506; author reply 1506. doi: 10.1126/science.1221434.
4
Lab exposure. Death of California researcher spurs investigation.实验室暴露。加利福尼亚州研究人员死亡引发调查。
Science. 2012 May 11;336(6082):659. doi: 10.1126/science.336.6082.659.
5
Addressing the vaccine confidence gap.解决疫苗信心差距问题。
Lancet. 2011 Aug 6;378(9790):526-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
6
Estimation of potential global pandemic influenza mortality on the basis of vital registry data from the 1918-20 pandemic: a quantitative analysis.基于1918 - 20年大流行期间生命登记数据对潜在全球大流行性流感死亡率的估计:一项定量分析。
Lancet. 2006 Dec 23;368(9554):2211-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69895-4.
7
Epidemiological and genetic analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome.严重急性呼吸综合征的流行病学与遗传学分析
Lancet Infect Dis. 2004 Nov;4(11):672-83. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01173-9.

重新思考潜在大流行病原体研究中的生物安全问题。

Rethinking biosafety in research on potential pandemic pathogens.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

mBio. 2012 Oct 9;3(5):e00360-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00360-12.

DOI:10.1128/mBio.00360-12
PMID:23047752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3484391/
Abstract

If accidentally released, mammalian-transmissible influenza A/H5N1 viruses could pose a greater threat to public health than possibly any other infectious agent currently under study in laboratories, because of such viruses' likely combination of transmissibility and virulence to humans. We advocate explicit risk-benefit assessments before work on such pathogens is permitted or funded, improvement of biosafety practices and enforcement, and harmonization of criteria for permitting such experiments across government agencies, as well as internationally. Such potential pandemic pathogens, as they have been called, jeopardize not only laboratory workers and their contacts, but also the wider population, who should be involved in assessments of when such risks are acceptable in the service of scientific knowledge that may itself bear major public health benefits.

摘要

如果意外释放,哺乳动物传播的甲型 H5N1 流感病毒可能比目前实验室研究的任何其他传染性病原体对公共健康构成更大的威胁,因为这些病毒可能具有在人与人之间传播的能力和对人类的毒性。我们主张在允许或资助此类病原体的工作之前,进行明确的风险效益评估,改进生物安全实践和执行,并协调政府机构以及国际上允许进行此类实验的标准。正如人们所说,这些潜在的大流行病原体不仅危及实验室工作人员及其接触者,还危及更广泛的人群,应该让他们参与评估何时可以接受这些风险,以服务于可能本身对公众健康带来重大利益的科学知识。