• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的伙伴关系,以确定生物样本研究参与的关键因素。

Community-based partnership to identify keys to biospecimen research participation.

作者信息

Erwin Deborah O, Moysich Kirsten, Kiviniemi Marc T, Saad-Harfouche Frances G, Davis Warren, Clark-Hargrave Nikia, Ciupak Gregory L, Ambrosone Christine B, Walker Charles

机构信息

Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2013 Mar;28(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0421-5.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-012-0421-5
PMID:23055133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3553248/
Abstract

Reported barriers to participation in biospecimen banking include unwillingness to undergo blood-draw procedures and concerns about confidentiality breaches, privacy, and discrimination. The study identified key factors and influential perspectives to address these barriers and inform methods to improve recruitment and research participation among racially diverse community. A mixed-methods, community-based participatory research orientation was used to collect formative findings to develop a pilot intervention. Methods included nine key informant interviews, three focus groups (n = 26), and 64 community surveys. Findings showed: (1) increased concern of exploitation by pharmaceutical company sponsor; (2) varied perceptions about monetary compensation for research participation; and (3) willingness to participate in a biospecimen banking study by more than 30% of the people in the community survey. Research participation and biospecimen donation may be influenced by who is sponsoring a study. Monetary incentives for study participation may be more important for African American than White participants.

摘要

报告显示,参与生物样本库建设存在诸多障碍,包括不愿接受采血程序,以及对保密性、隐私和歧视问题的担忧。该研究确定了关键因素和有影响力的观点,以解决这些障碍,并为改善种族多样化社区的招募和研究参与度提供方法。采用了一种混合方法、基于社区的参与性研究方向来收集形成性结果,以开发一项试点干预措施。方法包括九次关键 informant 访谈、三个焦点小组(n = 26)和64份社区调查。结果显示:(1)对制药公司赞助商剥削行为的担忧增加;(2)对研究参与的金钱补偿看法不一;(3)社区调查中超过30%的人愿意参与生物样本库研究。研究参与和生物样本捐赠可能会受到研究赞助商的影响。对于非裔美国参与者来说,参与研究的金钱激励可能比白人参与者更为重要。

相似文献

1
Community-based partnership to identify keys to biospecimen research participation.基于社区的伙伴关系,以确定生物样本研究参与的关键因素。
J Cancer Educ. 2013 Mar;28(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0421-5.
2
Factors associated with biomedical research participation within community-based samples across 3 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers.与三个美国国家癌症研究所指定癌症中心的社区样本中参与生物医学研究相关的因素。
Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;126(5):1077-1089. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32487. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Pilot intervention outcomes of an educational program for biospecimen research participation.生物样本研究参与教育项目的试点干预结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2013 Mar;28(1):52-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0434-0.
4
Factors associated with willingness to participate in biospecimen research among Chinese Americans.华裔美国人中与参与生物样本研究意愿相关的因素。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2014 Apr;12(2):131-8. doi: 10.1089/bio.2013.0081.
5
Using community-based participatory research principles to develop more understandable recruitment and informed consent documents in genomic research.运用基于社区的参与性研究原则,在基因组研究中制定更易于理解的招募和知情同意文件。
PLoS One. 2015 May 4;10(5):e0125466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125466. eCollection 2015.
6
Use of a community-based participatory research approach to assess knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs on biospecimen research among Pacific Islanders.采用基于社区的参与性研究方法来评估太平洋岛民对生物样本研究的知识、态度和信念。
Health Promot Pract. 2014 May;15(3):422-30. doi: 10.1177/1524839913516464. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
7
Awareness and interest in biospecimen donation for cancer research: views from gatekeepers and prospective participants in the Latino community.对癌症研究生物样本捐赠的认识和兴趣:来自拉丁裔社区守门人和潜在参与者的观点。
J Community Genet. 2013 Oct;4(4):461-8. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0152-2. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
8
Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Recruitment of Black People With Cancer in Biospecimen-Based Research.基于生物样本研究招募癌症黑人患者的障碍和促进因素的范围综述。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 May;8:e2300708. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00708.
9
Incorporating Participant and Clinical Feedback into a Community-Based Participatory Research Study of Colorectal Cancer Among Alaska Native People.将参与者和临床反馈纳入一项阿拉斯加原住民结直肠癌的社区参与式研究。
J Community Health. 2020 Aug;45(4):803-811. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00796-x.
10
The influence of community-based participatory research principles on the likelihood of participation in health research in American Indian communities.基于社区的参与性研究原则对美国印第安社区参与健康研究可能性的影响。
Ethn Dis. 2007 Winter;17(1 Suppl 1):S6-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Recruitment of Black People With Cancer in Biospecimen-Based Research.基于生物样本研究招募癌症黑人患者的障碍和促进因素的范围综述。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 May;8:e2300708. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00708.
2
Understanding men's beliefs and concerns about linking health data in the context of precision medicine.了解男性在精准医疗背景下对关联健康数据的信念和担忧。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jun 7;7(1):e150. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.573. eCollection 2023.
3
Recruiting African American Prostate Cancer Survivors for a Population-based Biobank Study.招募非裔美国前列腺癌幸存者参与基于人群的生物库研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jun 1;32(6):768-775. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-1157.
4
Recruitment and Retention of Healthy, Postmenopausal Women of African and European Ancestry: Results from a Dietary Intervention with Repeated Biospecimen Collections.招募和留住非洲和欧洲血统的健康绝经后女性:一项伴有重复生物样本采集的饮食干预研究结果
Curr Dev Nutr. 2022 Jan 29;6(3):nzac012. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzac012. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Learning from Black/African American Participants: Applying the Integrated Behavioral Model to Assess Recruitment Strategies for a Glaucoma Genetic Study.从非裔美国人参与者身上学习:应用综合行为模型评估青光眼遗传研究的招募策略。
Health Commun. 2022 Apr;37(4):515-524. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1853897. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
6
How Semantics Connotations May Influence Concerns About Donation of Biospecimens.语义内涵如何影响人们对生物样本捐赠的关注
Biopreserv Biobank. 2021 Jun;19(3):156-162. doi: 10.1089/bio.2020.0072. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
The reported impact of public involvement in biobanks: A scoping review.公众参与生物库的报告影响:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Aug;23(4):759-788. doi: 10.1111/hex.13067. Epub 2020 May 6.
8
Participant-Centered Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Biospecimen Collection among Spanish-Speaking Latina Breast Cancer Survivors.以参与者为中心的策略,用于克服讲西班牙语的拉丁裔乳腺癌幸存者生物样本采集的障碍
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Mar;29(3):606-615. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0942.
9
A Review of African Americans' Beliefs and Attitudes About Genomic Studies: Opportunities for Message Design.非裔美国人对基因组研究的信念与态度综述:信息设计的机遇
Front Genet. 2019 Jun 14;10:548. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00548. eCollection 2019.
10
Responsiveness and adaptability in community engaged biobanking research: experiences from a Hispanic community.社区参与式生物样本库研究中的响应性与适应性:来自西班牙裔社区的经验
J Community Genet. 2019 Jul;10(3):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0397-x. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Rhode Islanders' attitudes towards the development of a statewide genetic biobank.罗德岛居民对建立全州性基因生物样本库的态度。
Per Med. 2008 Jul;5(4):339-359. doi: 10.2217/17410541.5.4.339.
2
Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.关于生物样本库认知的形成性研究:社区成员的看法
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Mar;27(1):91-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-011-0275-2.
3
Achieving online consent to participation in large-scale gene-environment studies: a tangible destination.实现大规模基因-环境研究在线参与同意:一个切实的目标。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Aug;37(8):487-92. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040352. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
4
Multi-site implementation of health education programs for Latinas.针对拉丁裔女性的健康教育项目的多地点实施。
J Community Health. 2011 Apr;36(2):193-203. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9297-7.
5
Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking.公众对生物样本库知情同意的看法。
Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2128-34. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.157099. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
6
Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate.生物样本库研究中的知情同意:关于该辩论的一种审议方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Feb;68(4):781-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.020. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
7
Studying genetic research participants: lessons from the "Learning About Research in North Carolina" study.研究基因研究参与者:来自“了解北卡罗来纳州的研究”的经验教训。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Aug;17(8):2019-24. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2868.
8
Patients' refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study.瑞典生物样本库中患者拒绝同意存储和使用样本的情况:横断面研究
BMJ. 2008 Jul 10;337:a345. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a345.
9
Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions.生物样本库的知情同意:评估潜在参与者的理解与意见
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jun;17(6):1440-51. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0086.
10
Factors that influence characteristics of genetic biobanks.影响基因生物样本库特征的因素。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(1):25-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00139.x.