• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常阅读和无意识阅读中的眼球运动返回抑制。

Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading.

机构信息

University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1101-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0274-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-012-0274-2
PMID:23055138
Abstract

Oculomotor inhibition of return (O-IOR) is an increase in saccade latency prior to an eye movement to a recently fixated location, as compared with other locations. To investigate O-IOR in reading, subjects participated in two conditions while their eye movements were recorded: normal reading and mindless reading with words replaced by geometric shapes. We investigated the manifestation of O-IOR in reading and whether it is related to extracting meaning from the text or is an oculomotor phenomenon. The results indicated that fixation durations prior to a saccade returning to the immediately preceding fixated word were longer than those to other words, consistent with O-IOR. Furthermore, fixation durations were longest prior to a saccade that returned the eyes to the specific character position in the word that had previously been fixated and dropped off as the distance between the previously fixated character and landing position increased. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that O-IOR is relatively precise in its application during reading and drops off as a gradient. Both of these results were found for text reading and for mindless reading, suggesting that they are consequences of oculomotor control, and not of language processing. Finally, although these temporal IOR effects were robust, no spatial consequences of IOR were observed: Previously fixated words and characters were as likely to be refixated as new words and characters.

摘要

眼动抑制返回(Ocular Inhibition of Return,O-IOR)是指与其他位置相比,在眼睛运动到最近注视的位置之前,注视潜伏期会延长。为了研究阅读中的 O-IOR,参与者在两种条件下参与实验,同时记录他们的眼球运动:正常阅读和心不在焉地阅读,其中文字被几何形状代替。我们研究了阅读中 O-IOR 的表现,以及它是否与从文本中提取意义有关,或者是否是一种眼球运动现象。结果表明,在返回前一个注视词的眼球运动之前,注视持续时间比返回其他词的注视持续时间长,这与 O-IOR 一致。此外,在返回眼睛到先前注视的单词中特定字符位置的眼球运动之前,注视持续时间最长,并且随着先前注视的字符和着陆位置之间的距离增加而逐渐减少。这一结果与假设一致,即 O-IOR 在阅读过程中的应用相对精确,并呈梯度下降。这些结果在文本阅读和心不在焉地阅读中都得到了验证,表明它们是眼球运动控制的结果,而不是语言处理的结果。最后,尽管这些时间性 IOR 效应非常显著,但没有观察到 IOR 的空间后果:先前注视的单词和字符与新单词和字符一样有可能被重新注视。

相似文献

1
Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading.正常阅读和无意识阅读中的眼球运动返回抑制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1101-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0274-2.
2
Inhibition of saccade return in reading.阅读中扫视返回的抑制
Vision Res. 2003 Apr;43(9):1027-34. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00076-2.
3
Temporal oculomotor inhibition of return and spatial facilitation of return in a visual encoding task.在视觉编码任务中,时眼动返回抑制和空间返回易化。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 2;4:400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00400. eCollection 2013.
4
Dissociating temporal inhibition of return and saccadic momentum across multiple eye-movement tasks.在多个眼动任务中分离时间性返回抑制和扫视动量
J Vis. 2014 Dec 19;14(14):9. doi: 10.1167/14.14.9.
5
Oculomotor and cognitive control of eye movements in reading: evidence from mindless reading.阅读中眼动的动眼神经与认知控制:来自无意识阅读的证据
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Aug;75(6):1230-42. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0482-5.
6
Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect.阅读过程中注视位置对注视持续时间的影响:一种倒置的最佳观看位置效应。
Vision Res. 2001;41(25-26):3513-33. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00166-3.
7
Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length in Chinese reading.在中文阅读中,固定区域的词属性会影响外显扫视长度。
Vision Res. 2013 Mar 22;80:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.11.015. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
8
Does oculomotor inhibition of return influence fixation probability during scene search?动眼返回抑制是否会影响场景搜索过程中的注视概率?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2384-98. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0191-x.
9
Child readers' eye movements in reading Thai.儿童读者阅读泰语时的眼动情况。
Vision Res. 2016 Jun;123:8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.009. Epub 2016 May 12.
10
Undersweep fixations during reading in adults and children.成人和儿童阅读时的下扫视固视。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104788. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104788. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye Movements of Persons with Aphasia During Connected-Text Reading.失语症患者在连贯文本阅读过程中的眼球运动
Aphasiology. 2024 Oct 17. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2024.2413620.
2
Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.多感觉整合减弱了视觉诱导的眼跳运动返回抑制。
J Vis. 2022 Mar 2;22(4):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.4.7.
3
Cortical control of eye movements in natural reading: Evidence from MVPA.自然阅读中眼球运动的皮质控制:来自 MVPA 的证据。

本文引用的文献

1
Does oculomotor inhibition of return influence fixation probability during scene search?动眼返回抑制是否会影响场景搜索过程中的注视概率?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2384-98. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0191-x.
2
Looking back at Waldo: oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations.回顾沃尔多效应:动眼抑制返回并不妨碍返回注视。
J Vis. 2011 Jan 4;11(1):3. doi: 10.1167/11.1.3.
3
Influence of environmental statistics on inhibition of saccadic return.环境统计对扫视返回抑制的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Dec;237(12):3099-3107. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05655-3. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
4
Task-Related Differences in Eye Movements in Individuals With Aphasia.失语症患者眼动的任务相关差异。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 18;9:2430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02430. eCollection 2018.
5
Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading.利用眼动追踪技术区分阅读过程中基于理解和基于眼动的回视眼动
J Vis Exp. 2018 Oct 18(140):58442. doi: 10.3791/58442.
6
Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.从工作记忆和执行控制预测多项任务中的眼动特征。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):826-839. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0798-4.
7
Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause.阅读过程中的回视:代价取决于原因。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1211-1216. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1200-9.
8
The Influence of Content Meaningfulness on Eye Movements across Tasks: Evidence from Scene Viewing and Reading.内容意义对跨任务眼动的影响:来自场景观看和阅读的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 1;7:257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00257. eCollection 2016.
9
The neural substrates of natural reading: a comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI.自然阅读的神经基础:使用眼动追踪和功能磁共振成像对正常文本和非单词文本的比较。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Dec 23;8:1024. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01024. eCollection 2014.
10
Temporal oculomotor inhibition of return and spatial facilitation of return in a visual encoding task.在视觉编码任务中,时眼动返回抑制和空间返回易化。
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 2;4:400. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00400. eCollection 2013.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 12;107(2):929-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906845107. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
4
Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: a review.视觉搜索中返回抑制的研究综述
Vision Res. 2010 Jan;50(2):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
5
The mechanism underlying inhibition of saccadic return.抑制扫视返回的潜在机制。
Cogn Psychol. 2009 Sep;59(2):180-202. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
6
Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.新颖性并非总是最佳策略:视任务情况而定的返回抑制和返回促进。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):333-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02294.x. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
7
Mindless reading revisited: an analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control.重读盲目阅读:基于眼动控制SWIFT模型的分析
Vision Res. 2009 Feb;49(3):322-36. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.022. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
8
Fruitful visual search: inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task.富有成效的视觉搜索:虚拟觅食任务中的返回抑制
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Oct;13(5):891-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03194015.
9
The IOVP effect in mindless reading: experiment and modeling.无意义阅读中的内隐视觉启动效应:实验与建模
Vision Res. 2007 Mar;47(7):990-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
10
Attention and eye movements in reading: inhibition of return predicts the size of regressive saccades.阅读中的注意力与眼动:返回抑制可预测回视扫视的幅度。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):187-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01683.x.