• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

名词-名词组合:2160 对单词对的有意义评分和词汇统计。

Noun-noun combination: meaningfulness ratings and lexical statistics for 2,160 word pairs.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Smith Hall Room 337, 101 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):463-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0256-3.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-012-0256-3
PMID:23055162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3663253/
Abstract

The combining of individual concepts to form an emergent concept is a fundamental aspect of language, yet much less is known about it than about processing isolated words or sentences. To facilitate research on conceptual combination, we provide meaningfulness ratings for a large set of (2,160) noun-noun pairs. Half of these pairs (1,080) are reversed versions of the other half (e.g., SKI JACKET and JACKET SKI), to facilitate the comparison of successful and unsuccessful conceptual combination independently of constituent lexical items. The computer code used for obtaining these ratings through a Web interface is provided. To further enhance the usefulness of this resource, ancillary measures obtained from other sources are also provided for each pair. These measures include associate production norms, contextual relatedness in terms of latent semantic analysis distance, total number of letters, phrase-level usage frequency, and word-level usage frequency summed across the words in each pair. Results of correlation and regression analyses are also provided for a quantitative description of the stimulus set. A subset of these stimuli was used to identify neural correlates of successful conceptual combination Graves, Binder, Desai, Conant, & Seidenberg, (NeuroImage 53:638-646, 2010). The stimuli can be used in other research and also provide benchmark data for evaluating the effectiveness of computational algorithms for predicting meaningfulness of noun-noun pairs.

摘要

将单个概念组合成一个新的整体概念是语言的一个基本方面,但人们对它的了解远不如对孤立单词或句子的处理了解得多。为了促进对概念组合的研究,我们提供了大量(2160)名词-名词对的有意义性评分。这些对的一半(1080)是另一半的反转版本(例如,SKI JACKET 和 JACKET SKI),以便在不考虑组成词汇的情况下独立比较成功和不成功的概念组合。提供了通过 Web 界面获得这些评分的计算机代码。为了进一步增强此资源的有用性,还为每一对提供了其他来源获得的辅助措施。这些措施包括联想产生规范、潜在语义分析距离方面的上下文相关性、总字母数、短语级使用频率以及每个对中单词的单词级使用频率。还提供了相关和回归分析的结果,以定量描述刺激集。这些刺激的一个子集被用于识别成功概念组合的神经相关性 Graves、Binder、Desai、Conant 和 Seidenberg(NeuroImage 53:638-646, 2010)。这些刺激可用于其他研究,也可提供基准数据,用于评估用于预测名词-名词对有意义性的计算算法的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eae/3663253/c414ac58b5f2/13428_2012_256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eae/3663253/c414ac58b5f2/13428_2012_256_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2eae/3663253/c414ac58b5f2/13428_2012_256_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Noun-noun combination: meaningfulness ratings and lexical statistics for 2,160 word pairs.名词-名词组合:2160 对单词对的有意义评分和词汇统计。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):463-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0256-3.
2
The Two Word Test as a semantic benchmark for large language models.双词测试作为大语言模型的语义基准。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):21593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72528-3.
3
Lexical Planning in Sentence Production Is Highly Incremental: Evidence from ERPs.句子生成中的词汇规划具有高度的增量性:来自事件相关电位的证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146359. eCollection 2016.
4
Lexical access in the production of noun phrases.名词短语生成中的词汇通达
Cognition. 1992 Oct;45(1):33-54. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90022-a.
5
Online processing of sentences containing noun modification in young children with high-functioning autism.高功能自闭症幼儿对包含名词修饰的句子的在线处理
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Mar;51(2):137-47. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12191. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
6
Noun and verb processing in aphasia: Behavioural profiles and neural correlates.失语症中的名词和动词加工:行为特征和神经关联。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jan 31;18:215-230. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.023. eCollection 2018.
7
Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form.400 个名词的模态排他性规范:知觉体验与词表形式的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):516-26. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0267-0.
8
Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words.三千个双音节词的可想象性估计。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Jun;44(2):374-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0162-0.
9
From letters to composed concepts: A magnetoencephalography study of reading.从字母到组合概念:一项关于阅读的脑磁图研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 15;42(15):5130-5153. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25608. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
10
No Morphological Markers, No Problem: ERP Study Reveals Semantic Contribution to Distinct Neural Substrates Between Noun and Verb Processing in Online Sentence Comprehension.没有形态标记,没问题:事件相关电位研究揭示在线句子理解中名词和动词加工时语义对不同神经基质的贡献。
Front Neurosci. 2019 Sep 10;13:957. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00957. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
The Two Word Test as a semantic benchmark for large language models.双词测试作为大语言模型的语义基准。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 16;14(1):21593. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72528-3.
2
An inclusive multivariate approach to neural localization of language components.一种包容的多变量方法,用于语言成分的神经定位。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Jun;229(5):1243-1263. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02800-9. Epub 2024 May 2.
3
Functional connectivity of brain networks during semantic processing in older adults.老年人语义加工过程中脑网络的功能连接性

本文引用的文献

1
Simple composition: a magnetoencephalography investigation into the comprehension of minimal linguistic phrases.简单构成:一项运用脑磁图技术研究最小语言短语理解的研究。
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 23;31(8):2801-14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-10.2011.
2
Evidence for conceptual combination in the left anterior temporal lobe.左前颞叶中的概念组合证据。
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1847-52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.066. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
3
Neural correlates of implicit and explicit combinatorial semantic processing.内隐和外显组合语义加工的神经关联。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Oct 19;14:814882. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.814882. eCollection 2022.
4
Understanding Karma Police: The Perceived Plausibility of Noun Compounds as Predicted by Distributional Models of Semantic Representation.理解《因果警察》:语义表征分布模型预测的名词复合词的可感知合理性。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0163200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163200. eCollection 2016.
5
Linking somatic and symbolic representation in semantic memory: the dynamic multilevel reactivation framework.语义记忆中躯体与符号表征的关联:动态多层次再激活框架
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Aug;23(4):1002-14. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0824-5.
6
Causal Evidence for a Mechanism of Semantic Integration in the Angular Gyrus as Revealed by High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.高分辨率经颅直流电刺激揭示的角回语义整合机制的因果证据
J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 30;36(13):3829-38. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3120-15.2016.
7
Stereotypes possess heterogeneous directionality: a theoretical and empirical exploration of stereotype structure and content.刻板印象具有异质性方向性:对刻板印象结构与内容的理论及实证探索。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0122292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122292. eCollection 2015.
8
A dataset of metaphors from the italian literature: exploring psycholinguistic variables and the role of context.一个来自意大利文学的隐喻数据集:探索心理语言学变量及语境的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 22;9(9):e105634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105634. eCollection 2014.
Neuroimage. 2010 Nov 1;53(2):638-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.055. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
4
Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies.语义系统在哪里?120 项功能神经影像学研究的批判性回顾和荟萃分析。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
5
Development of neural systems for reading.阅读神经系统的发育
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:475-503. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135645.
6
Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.重新审视视觉单词识别中的词长效应:来自英语词汇项目的新证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):45-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03193811.
7
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects.重复与大脑:刺激特异性效应的神经模型
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jan;10(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006.
8
Frequency of relation type as a determinant of conceptual combination: a reanalysis.关系类型的频率作为概念组合的一个决定因素:重新分析
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jan;31(1):169-74. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.169.
9
The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms.南佛罗里达大学自由联想、押韵及单词片段常模。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):402-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195588.
10
Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words.3000个单音节词的可意象性评级
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):384-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03195585.