• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用激励措施在癌症患者调查中:“最佳实践”是否适用?

Using incentives in surveys of cancer patients: do "best practices" apply?

机构信息

College of Public Health, Kent State University, P.O. Box 5190, Kent, OH 44242-0001, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Dec;23(12):2047-52. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0082-z. Epub 2012 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-012-0082-z
PMID:23076587
Abstract

PURPOSE

Surveys of cancer patients are an important means of collecting data necessary to improve cancer prevention and control. However, health surveys generally are characterized by declining response rates, with incentives often employed to encourage participation. While successful, magnitude of effect is partially dependent upon situational characteristics of respondents, including health status. Given the health challenges experienced by cancer patients, it is unclear to what extent incentives can improve survey participation. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of monetary and non-monetary incentives in improving response to cancer patient surveys.

METHODS

We reviewed the available experimental literature regarding efforts to improve response rates among cancer patients/survivors via incentives. Relevant studies were identified through searches of the MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychINFO databases from 1975 to 2012. Seed sources (e.g., Cancer Causes & Control, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, and BMC Medical Research Methodology) were also referenced extensively in order to establish a comprehensive set of studies.

RESULTS

Although limited, evidence does suggest that token incentives may be less effective for improving survey participation among cancer patients, relative to other population groups. These results are contrary to well-established evidence regarding the efficacy of incentives in improving survey participation generally. Potential reasons why incentives may be less effective in this population are explored.

CONCLUSIONS

While more research is necessary, results suggest that survey research strategies targeting cancer patients be purposively designed in a manner that gives consideration to the distress associated with the condition, including selection of alternative strategies to improve response.

摘要

目的

癌症患者调查是收集必要数据以改善癌症预防和控制的重要手段。然而,健康调查通常具有下降的回应率,往往采用激励措施来鼓励参与。虽然成功了,但效果的大小部分取决于受访者的情境特征,包括健康状况。鉴于癌症患者所面临的健康挑战,尚不清楚激励措施在多大程度上可以提高调查参与度。在这项研究中,我们研究了金钱和非金钱激励措施在提高癌症患者调查回应率方面的有效性。

方法

我们通过对 MEDLINE、PubMed 和 PsychINFO 数据库从 1975 年到 2012 年的搜索,回顾了关于通过激励措施提高癌症患者/幸存者回应率的现有实验文献。还广泛参考了种子资源(例如,癌症原因与控制、癌症流行病学、生物标志物与预防和 BMC 医学研究方法学),以建立一套全面的研究。

结果

尽管证据有限,但确实表明,与其他人群相比,代币激励措施可能对提高癌症患者的调查参与度效果较差。这些结果与激励措施在一般提高调查参与度方面的既定证据相反。探讨了为什么激励措施在这一人群中效果较差的潜在原因。

结论

虽然需要更多的研究,但结果表明,针对癌症患者的调查研究策略应以一种考虑到与该疾病相关的痛苦的方式有目的地设计,包括选择替代策略来提高回应率。

相似文献

1
Using incentives in surveys of cancer patients: do "best practices" apply?使用激励措施在癌症患者调查中:“最佳实践”是否适用?
Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Dec;23(12):2047-52. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0082-z. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
2
Response rates to a mailed survey targeting childhood cancer survivors: a comparison of conditional versus unconditional incentives.针对儿童癌症幸存者的邮寄调查问卷的回复率:有条件激励与无条件激励的比较。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1330-2. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0716.
3
Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.提高卫生保健专业人员调查的回应率:改善回应率的技术的荟萃分析。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):382-407. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496425.
4
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
5
Surveying nurses: identifying strategies to improve participation.调查护士:确定提高参与度的策略。
Eval Health Prof. 2011 Dec;34(4):487-511. doi: 10.1177/0163278711399572. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
6
Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.通过网络调查临床医生:设计和管理中的当前问题。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):352-81. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496630.
7
Incentives and procedures effective in increasing survey participation of professional nurses in hospitals.在提高医院专业护士调查参与率方面有效的激励措施和程序。
Nurs Adm Q. 2009 Apr-Jun;33(2):174-87. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3181a10db6.
8
Exploring implications of Medicaid participation and wait times for colorectal screening on early detection efforts in Connecticut--a secret-shopper survey.探索医疗补助计划参与情况及结直肠癌筛查等待时间对康涅狄格州早期检测工作的影响——一项暗访调查
Conn Med. 2013 Apr;77(4):197-203.
9
How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.在对医生进行调查时如何获得出色的回应率。
Fam Pract. 2009 Feb;26(1):65-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn097. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
10
Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.回复率与代表性:抽奖激励提高了医生调查问卷的回复率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Aug;14(8):571-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.1126.

引用本文的文献

1
How to implement routine electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring in oncology rehabilitation.如何在肿瘤康复中实施常规电子患者报告结局监测。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;75(4):e13694. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13694. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
2
Electronic Patient Reporting of Adverse Events and Quality of Life: A Prospective Feasibility Study in General Oncology.电子不良事件和生活质量报告:一般肿瘤学中的前瞻性可行性研究。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Mar;17(3):e386-e396. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00118. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
3
Population-Based Survey Methods for Reaching Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Cancer and Their Parents.
基于人群的调查方法,以接触儿科癌症的青少年和年轻成年幸存者及其父母。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019 Feb;8(1):40-48. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0033. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
4
Characterization of skin reactions and pain reported by patients receiving radiation therapy for cancer at different sites.对不同部位癌症接受放射治疗患者报告的皮肤反应和疼痛的特征描述。
J Support Oncol. 2013 Dec;11(4):183-9. doi: 10.12788/j.suponc.0009.
5
Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system.将患者报告结局与临床癌症登记数据相结合:癌症幸存者电子患者报告结局(ePOCS)系统的可行性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Oct 25;15(10):e230. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2764.