Suppr超能文献

应用二维及多普勒超声心动图测定正常及狭窄生物瓣膜置换患者的主动脉瓣面积

Determination of aortic valve area by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in patients with normal and stenotic bioprosthetic valves.

作者信息

Rothbart R M, Castriz J L, Harding L V, Russo C D, Teague S M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Mar 15;15(4):817-24. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90280-3.

Abstract

To assess the feasibility and accuracy of determining bioprosthetic aortic valve area from two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic measurements, three partially overlapping groups were selected from 55 patients with such bioprosthetic valves and adequate Doppler studies. These were Group 1, 37 patients with recent aortic valve replacement surgery and no clinical or echocardiographic evidence of valve dysfunction; Group 2, 12 patients with prosthetic valve stenosis documented by cardiac catheterization; and Group 3, 22 patients with both Doppler and catheterization studies in whom noninvasive and invasive determinations of aortic valve area could be directly compared. Left ventricular outflow tract diameter was measured from two-dimensional still frame images. Flow velocity proximal to the aortic valve, transvalvular velocity and acceleration time were determined from pulsed and continuous wave Doppler spectra. Aortic valve gradient was calculated with the modified Bernoulli equation and valve area by the continuity equation. In the 37 patients with a normally functioning valve, the calculated mean gradient ranged from 5 to 25 mm Hg (average 13.6 +/- 5.2) and valve area from 1.0 to 2.3 cm2 (mean 1.6 +/- 0.31). Linear regression analysis of prosthetic aortic valve area determined by Doppler imaging and cardiac catheterization demonstrated a high correlation (r = 0.93) between the two techniques. Comparison of the patients with and without prosthetic valve stenosis revealed statistically significant differences in mean gradient (42.8 +/- 12.3 versus 13.6 +/- 5.2 mm Hg; p = 0.0001), acceleration time (116 +/- 15 versus 80 +/- 13 ms; p = 0.0001) and valve area by the continuity equation (0.80 +/- 0.16 versus 1.6 +/- 0.31 cm2; p = 0.0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为评估通过二维和多普勒超声心动图测量来确定生物瓣主动脉瓣面积的可行性和准确性,从55例植入生物瓣且有充分多普勒研究的患者中选取了三个部分重叠的组。第一组为37例近期接受主动脉瓣置换手术且无临床或超声心动图证据表明瓣膜功能障碍的患者;第二组为12例经心导管检查证实有人工瓣膜狭窄的患者;第三组为22例同时进行了多普勒和心导管检查的患者,可直接比较主动脉瓣面积的非侵入性和侵入性测定结果。从二维静态图像测量左心室流出道直径。通过脉冲和连续波多普勒频谱确定主动脉瓣近端的流速、跨瓣流速和加速时间。用改良的伯努利方程计算主动脉瓣压差,用连续方程计算瓣膜面积。在37例瓣膜功能正常的患者中,计算出的平均压差为5至25mmHg(平均13.6±5.2),瓣膜面积为1.0至2.3cm²(平均1.6±0.31)。对多普勒成像和心导管检查测定的人工主动脉瓣面积进行线性回归分析显示,两种技术之间具有高度相关性(r = 0.93)。有和无人造瓣膜狭窄患者的比较显示,平均压差(42.8±12.3对13.6±5.2mmHg;p = 0.0001)、加速时间(116±15对80±13ms;p = 0.0001)和连续方程计算的瓣膜面积(0.80±0.16对1.6±0.31cm²;p = 0.0001)存在统计学显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验