Department of Neurology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, #123, Ta-Pei Road, Niaosung, Kaohsiung County 833, Taiwan.
Neuroradiology. 2013 Jan;55(1):107-15. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1102-0. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values often reflect tissue injury. Use of ADC as a surrogate marker to assess clinical phases has not been systemically applied in patients with carbon monoxide (CO) intoxication.
Fifty-nine magnetic resonance imaging scans and cognitive evaluations were performed in 47 patients with CO intoxication and compared with 22 sex- and age-matched controls. The patients were further classified into three groups based on the clinical phases, namely, acute (within 2 weeks), delayed neuropsychiatric (2 weeks to 6 months), and chronic (>1 year) groups. The ADC values were measured in 16 regions of interests (ROIs) and correlated with cognitive test scores.
Among the 59 evaluations, 15 were in the acute, 26 in the delayed neuropsychiatric, and 18 in the chronic groups. Among the ROIs, significant elevations of ADC values were found in the corpus callosum and globus pallidus in all three CO phases compared with the controls, and the ADC values were highest in the chronic phases. In contrast, the ADC values in peripheral gray matter and white matter were highest in the delayed neuropsychiatric group. Both globus pallidus and corpus callosum ADC values correlated with multiple cognitive test scores.
Using ADC as a surrogate marker, the globus pallidus and corpus callosum can be considered to be two vulnerable structures in the gray and white matter. Significant differences between ADC values correlated well with clinical phase and cognitive performance.
表观扩散系数(ADC)值的变化通常反映组织损伤。将 ADC 用作评估临床阶段的替代标志物尚未在一氧化碳(CO)中毒患者中系统应用。
对 47 例 CO 中毒患者的 59 次磁共振成像扫描和认知评估结果与 22 名性别和年龄匹配的对照者进行比较。根据临床阶段,将患者进一步分为三组,即急性(2 周内)、迟发性神经精神(2 周到 6 个月)和慢性(>1 年)组。在 16 个感兴趣区(ROI)中测量 ADC 值,并与认知测试评分相关联。
在 59 次评估中,15 次处于急性期,26 次处于迟发性神经精神期,18 次处于慢性期。在所有三个 CO 阶段,与对照组相比,胼胝体和苍白球的 ADC 值均显著升高,且在慢性期最高。相比之下,在迟发性神经精神组中,外周灰质和白质的 ADC 值最高。苍白球和胼胝体的 ADC 值与多项认知测试评分相关。
使用 ADC 作为替代标志物,苍白球和胼胝体可以被认为是灰质和白质中两个易受影响的结构。ADC 值的显著差异与临床阶段和认知表现密切相关。