Suppr超能文献

生物技术行业中的中游调控:重新定义行业研究人员“工作内容”的一部分。

Midstream modulation in biotechnology industry: redefining what is 'part of the job' of researchers in industry.

机构信息

Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, 2628 BC, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):1141-64. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9411-6. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

Abstract

In response to an increasing amount of policy papers stressing the need for integrating social and ethical aspects in Research and Development (R&D) practices, science studies scholars have conducted integrative research and experiments with science and innovation actors. One widely employed integration method is Midstream Modulation (MM), in which an 'embedded humanist' interacts in regular meetings with researchers to engage them with the social and ethical aspects of their work. While the possibility of using MM to enhance critical reflection has been demonstrated in academic settings, few attempts have been made to examine its appropriateness in industry. This paper describes the outcomes of a case study aiming to find out firstly whether MM can effectively be deployed to encourage and facilitate researchers to actively include social and ethical aspects in their daily R&D practice, and secondly to what extent the integration activities could form an integral part of the engaged industrial researchers' professional activities. Our data show that after MM, researchers display increased reflexive awareness on the social and ethical aspects of their work and acknowledge the relevance and utility of such aspects on their daily practice. Also, all participants considered actively reflecting on social and ethical aspects to be part of their work. Future research on the role of MM in industrial settings could focus on how to embed social and ethical integration as a regular part of innovation practice. We suggest that one possibility would be through aligning social and ethical aspects with innovation Key Performance Indicators.

摘要

针对越来越多的政策文件强调需要将社会和伦理方面纳入研究与开发 (R&D) 实践中这一情况,科学研究学者与科学和创新行为者开展了综合研究和实验。一种广泛应用的整合方法是中游调节(MM),其中一个“嵌入式人文主义者”在定期会议中与研究人员互动,使他们参与到工作的社会和伦理方面。虽然已经证明在学术环境中使用 MM 可以增强批判性反思的可能性,但在工业领域中,很少有尝试来检验其适当性。本文描述了一项案例研究的结果,旨在首先确定 MM 是否可以有效地用于鼓励和促进研究人员在日常 R&D 实践中积极纳入社会和伦理方面,其次确定整合活动在多大程度上可以成为参与的工业研究人员专业活动的一个组成部分。我们的数据显示,在 MM 之后,研究人员对工作的社会和伦理方面表现出增强的反思意识,并承认这些方面对日常实践的相关性和实用性。此外,所有参与者都认为积极反思社会和伦理方面是其工作的一部分。未来在工业环境中对 MM 作用的研究可以集中在如何将社会和伦理整合嵌入创新实践中。我们建议,一种可能性是通过将社会和伦理方面与创新关键绩效指标对齐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验