Centre for Society and Genomics, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen,The Netherlands.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):769-88. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
In response to widespread policy prescriptions for responsible innovation, social scientists and engineering ethicists, among others, have sought to engage natural scientists and engineers at the 'midstream': building interdisciplinary collaborations to integrate social and ethical considerations with research and development processes. Two 'laboratory engagement studies' have explored how applying the framework of midstream modulation could enhance the reflections of natural scientists on the socio-ethical context of their work. The results of these interdisciplinary collaborations confirm the utility of midstream modulation in encouraging both first- and second-order reflective learning. The potential for second-order reflective learning, in which underlying value systems become the object of reflection, is particularly significant with respect to addressing social responsibility in research practices. Midstream modulation served to render the socio-ethical context of research visible in the laboratory and helped enable research participants to more critically reflect on this broader context. While lab-based collaborations would benefit from being carried out in concert with activities at institutional and policy levels, midstream modulation could prove a valuable asset in the toolbox of interdisciplinary methods aimed at responsible innovation.
针对广泛的负责任创新政策建议,社会科学家和工程伦理学家等,一直试图让自然科学家和工程师参与到“中游”:建立跨学科合作,将社会和伦理考虑纳入研究和开发过程。两项“实验室参与研究”探索了应用中游调节框架如何增强自然科学家对其工作的社会伦理背景的反思。这些跨学科合作的结果证实了中游调节在鼓励第一级和第二级反思性学习方面的效用。在研究实践中解决社会责任问题方面,特别是在深层次的反思学习中,潜在的价值体系成为反思的对象,这一点尤为重要。中游调节使研究的社会伦理背景在实验室中变得可见,并帮助研究参与者更批判性地反思这一更广泛的背景。虽然基于实验室的合作将受益于与机构和政策层面的活动同时进行,但中游调节可能成为旨在负责任创新的跨学科方法工具箱中的一个有价值的资产。