Suppr超能文献

实验室工作走向社交化,反之亦然:规划公众参与流程的策略:评论:“实验室里发生的事情不会留在实验室里:应用中游调节来增强实验室中的批判性反思”。

Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory".

机构信息

UK ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics, Cesagen, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, FASS Building, County South, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4YD, UK.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Dec;17(4):791-800. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9316-9. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

Abstract

Midstream modulation is a form of public engagement with science which benefits from strategic application of science and technology studies (STS) insights accumulated over nearly 20 years. These have been developed from STS researchers' involvement in practical engagement processes and research with scientists, science funders, policy and other public stakeholders. The strategic aim of this specific method, to develop what is termed second-order reflexivity amongst scientist-technologists, builds upon and advances earlier more general STS work. However this method is focused and structured so as to help generate such reflexivity-over the 'upstream' questions which have been identified in other STS research as important public issues for scientific research, development and innovation-amongst practising scientists-technologists in their specialist contexts (public or private, in principle). This is a different focus from virtually all such previous work, and offers novel opportunities for those key broader issues to be opened up. The further development of these promising results depends on some important conditions such as identifying and engaging research funders and other stakeholders like affected publics in similar exercises. Implementing these conditions could connect the productive impacts of midstream modulation with wider public engagement work, including with 'uninvited' public engagement with science. It would also generate broader institutional and political changes in the larger networks of institutional actors which constitute contemporary technoscientific innovation and governance processes. All of these various broader dimensions, far beyond the laboratory alone, need to be appropriately open, committed to democratic needs, and reflexive, for the aims of midstream modulation to be achieved, whilst allowing specialists to work as specialists.

摘要

中游调节是一种与科学公众参与的形式,得益于近 20 年来积累的科学技术研究(STS)见解的战略应用。这些见解来自 STS 研究人员参与实践参与过程以及与科学家、科学资助者、政策制定者和其他公众利益相关者的研究。这种特定方法的战略目标是在科学家-技术人员中发展所谓的二阶反思,这是在早期更广泛的 STS 工作的基础上发展和推进的。然而,这种方法是有针对性和结构化的,旨在帮助在实践科学家-技术人员的专业背景下(原则上是公共或私人的)产生这种反思——针对其他 STS 研究中被确定为对科学研究、发展和创新很重要的公共问题的“上游”问题。这与几乎所有此类先前工作的重点都不同,并为解决这些关键的广泛问题提供了新的机会。这些有前途的结果的进一步发展取决于一些重要的条件,例如在类似的实践中识别和吸引研究资助者以及其他利益相关者,如受影响的公众。实施这些条件可以将中游调节的生产影响与更广泛的公众参与工作联系起来,包括与科学的“不受邀请”公众参与。它还将在构成当代技术科学创新和治理过程的更大的机构行为者网络中产生更广泛的制度和政治变革。所有这些不同的更广泛的层面,远远超出了实验室本身,都需要适当开放、致力于民主需求,并进行反思,才能实现中游调节的目标,同时允许专家作为专家开展工作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验