Suppr超能文献

心肺运动试验(CPET)设备的准确性和精密度:逐次呼吸法与混合室系统的比较

Accuracy and precision of CPET equipment: a comparison of breath-by-breath and mixing chamber systems.

作者信息

Beijst Casper, Schep Goof, Breda Eric van, Wijn Pieter F F, Pul Carola van

机构信息

Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Applied Physics, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Eng Technol. 2013 Jan;37(1):35-42. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2012.733057. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has become an important diagnostic tool for patients with cardiorespiratory disease and can monitor athletic performance measuring maximal oxygen uptake [Formula: see text]Vo2(; max). The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy and precision of a breath-by-breath and a mixing chamber CPET system, using two methods. First, this study developed a (theoretical) error analysis based on general error propagation theory. Second, calibration measurements using a metabolic simulator were performed. Error analysis shows that the error in oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]Vo2) and carbon dioxide production (Vco2[Formula: see text]) is smaller for mixing chamber than for breath-by-breath systems. In general, the error of the flow sensor [Formula: see text]δV, the error in temperature of expired air δT(B) and the delay time error δt(delay) are significant sources of error. Measurements using a metabolic simulator show that breath-by-breath systems are less stabile for different values of minute ventilation than mixing chamber systems.

摘要

心肺运动试验(CPET)已成为心肺疾病患者的重要诊断工具,并且可以通过测量最大摄氧量([公式:见正文]Vo₂(max))来监测运动表现。本研究的目的是使用两种方法比较逐次呼吸和混合室CPET系统的准确性和精密度。首先,本研究基于一般误差传播理论开展了(理论)误差分析。其次,使用代谢模拟器进行了校准测量。误差分析表明,混合室系统在摄氧量([公式:见正文]Vo₂)和二氧化碳产生量(Vco₂[公式:见正文])方面的误差比逐次呼吸系统小。一般来说,流量传感器误差[公式:见正文]δV、呼出气温度误差δT(B)和延迟时间误差δt(delay)是显著的误差来源。使用代谢模拟器进行的测量表明,与混合室系统相比,逐次呼吸系统在不同分钟通气量值下的稳定性较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验