• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Men's and women's exposure and perpetration of partner violence: an epidemiological study from Sweden.男性和女性遭受伴侣暴力和实施暴力行为:来自瑞典的一项流行病学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 2;12:945. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-945.
2
Women's and men's reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women's risk factors for intimate partner violence: A multicountry cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific.关于过去一年亲密伴侣暴力和强奸的女性及男性报告以及女性亲密伴侣暴力的风险因素:一项在亚洲及太平洋地区开展的多国横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 5;14(9):e1002381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002381. eCollection 2017 Sep.
3
Effectiveness of a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission among men, women, and couples in rural Ethiopia: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.文化适宜型干预在埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防男性、女性和夫妻间亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的效果:一项基于群组随机对照试验的研究结果。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003274. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Ecological pathways to prevention: How does the SASA! community mobilisation model work to prevent physical intimate partner violence against women?预防的生态途径:“SASA!”社区动员模式如何预防针对妇女的亲密伴侣身体暴力?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 16;16:339. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3018-9.
5
Women are considerably more exposed to intimate partner violence than men in Rwanda: results from a population-based, cross-sectional study.在卢旺达,女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的情况比男性严重得多:一项基于人群的横断面研究结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Aug 26;14:99. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-99.
6
Intimate partner violence perpetration, standard and gendered STI/HIV risk behaviour, and STI/HIV diagnosis among a clinic-based sample of men.基于诊所的男性样本中亲密伴侣暴力行为、标准和性别化的性传播感染/艾滋病风险行为以及性传播感染/艾滋病诊断。
Sex Transm Infect. 2009 Dec;85(7):555-60. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.036368. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
7
Risk factors for men's lifetime perpetration of physical violence against intimate partners: results from the international men and gender equality survey (IMAGES) in eight countries.男性一生中对亲密伴侣实施身体暴力的风险因素:来自八个国家的国际男性与性别平等调查(IMAGES)结果
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 3;10(3):e0118639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118639. eCollection 2015.
8
Prevalence of intimate partner violence and its association with symptoms of depression; a cross-sectional study based on a female population sample in Sweden.亲密伴侣暴力的患病率及其与抑郁症状的关联;一项基于瑞典女性人口样本的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4222-y.
9
Factor structures for aggression and victimization among women who used aggression against male partners.针对对男性伴侣使用过攻击行为的女性的攻击和受害的因子结构。
Violence Against Women. 2012 Sep;18(9):1045-66. doi: 10.1177/1077801212461429. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
10
Intimate partner violence and help-seeking--a cross-sectional study of women in Sweden.亲密伴侣暴力与求助行为——瑞典女性的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2013 Sep 21;13:866. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-866.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of symptom exaggeration among North American independent medical evaluation examinees: A systematic review of observational studies.北美独立医学评估受检者中症状夸大的患病率:观察性研究的系统评价
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0324684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324684. eCollection 2025.
2
Health status among women and men in Canada who reported experiences of non-physical intimate partner violence, Canada.加拿大报告有非身体亲密伴侣暴力经历的男性和女性的健康状况,加拿大。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Feb 17;51:103011. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103011. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Association between witnessing physical violence between parents and intimate partner violence against Bolivian men: A national cross-sectional analysis of the 2016 demographic and health survey.目睹父母间身体暴力与玻利维亚男性遭受亲密伴侣暴力之间的关联:对2016年人口与健康调查的全国横断面分析
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Dec 16;49:102948. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102948. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Anger's moderating influence on the relationship between victimization and perpetration of domestic violence and abuse in patients suffering from severe mental illness. Insights from a cross sectional study using moderated mediation analysis.愤怒对患有严重精神疾病患者遭受家庭暴力和虐待及实施此类行为之间关系的调节作用。来自一项使用调节中介分析的横断面研究的见解。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 24;15:1509982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1509982. eCollection 2024.
5
Causal and common risk pathways linking childhood maltreatment to later intimate partner violence victimization.将童年期虐待与后期亲密伴侣暴力受害联系起来的因果及共同风险路径。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 May;30(5):2027-2037. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02813-0. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
6
Causal and common risk pathways linking childhood maltreatment to later intimate partner violence victimization.将童年期虐待与后来亲密伴侣暴力受害联系起来的因果和共同风险途径。
Res Sq. 2024 Jun 7:rs.3.rs-4409798. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4409798/v1.
7
Women with disabilities' experiences of intimate partner violence: a qualitative study from Sweden.残疾女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的经历:来自瑞典的定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02524-8.
8
Epidemiology of intimate partner violence perpetration and victimisation in a representative sample.代表性样本中亲密伴侣暴力实施和受害的流行病学。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2023 Apr 19;32:e25. doi: 10.1017/S2045796023000069.
9
Partner violence surrounding divorce: A record-linkage study of wives and their husbands.离婚期间的伴侣暴力:一项针对妻子及其丈夫的记录链接研究。
J Marriage Fam. 2023 Feb;85(1):33-54. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12881. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
10
The relationship between interpersonal violence in adulthood and mental health: a longitudinal study based on the Northern Swedish Cohort.成年期人际暴力与心理健康之间的关系:基于瑞典北部队列的纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15525-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Why I Hit Him: Women's Reasons for Intimate Partner Violence.我为何打他:女性实施亲密伴侣暴力的原因
J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2009 Oct;18(7):672-697. doi: 10.1080/10926770903231783.
2
Why do women use intimate partner violence? A systematic review of women's motivations.为什么女性会使用亲密伴侣暴力?对女性动机的系统综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2010 Oct;11(4):178-89. doi: 10.1177/1524838010379003.
3
Partner violence and psychological well-being: buffer or indirect effect of social support.伴侣暴力与心理健康:社会支持的缓冲或间接效应。
Psychosom Med. 2010 May;72(4):383-9. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d2f0dd. Epub 2010 Apr 5.
4
Exploring gender differences in the patterns of intimate partner violence in Canada: a latent class approach.探索加拿大亲密伴侣暴力模式中的性别差异:潜在类别分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Oct;64(10):849-54. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.095208. Epub 2009 Oct 15.
5
Intimate terrorism and common couple violence. A test of Johnson's predictions in four British samples.亲密恐怖主义与普通伴侣暴力。对约翰逊在四个英国样本中的预测进行的检验。
J Interpers Violence. 2003 Nov;18(11):1247-70. doi: 10.1177/0886260503256656.
6
Gender symmetry, sexism, and intimate partner violence.性别对称、性别歧视与亲密伴侣暴力。
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Nov;24(11):1816-34. doi: 10.1177/0886260508325496. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
7
A review of research on women's use of violence with male intimate partners.关于女性对男性亲密伴侣使用暴力的研究综述。
Violence Vict. 2008;23(3):301-14. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.23.3.301.
8
Abuse characteristics and coping resources as predictors of problem-focused coping strategies among battered women.受虐妇女的虐待特征和应对资源作为问题聚焦应对策略的预测因素
Violence Against Women. 2008 Apr;14(4):437-56. doi: 10.1177/1077801208314831.
9
Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen U.S. states/territories, 2005.2005年美国18个州/领地亲密伴侣暴力的患病率及风险因素
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Feb;34(2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.10.001.
10
Who is most at risk for intimate partner violence? A Canadian population-based study.谁最容易遭受亲密伴侣暴力?一项基于加拿大人口的研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Dec;22(12):1495-514. doi: 10.1177/0886260507306566.

男性和女性遭受伴侣暴力和实施暴力行为:来自瑞典的一项流行病学研究。

Men's and women's exposure and perpetration of partner violence: an epidemiological study from Sweden.

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine and Public Health/Social Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Box 453, 40530, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 2;12:945. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-945.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-945
PMID:23116238
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3534228/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the past 30 years, intimate partner violence (IPV) against women and its health consequences has become a well established research area and is recognized worldwide as a significant public health issue. Studies on IPV directed at men are less explored, however recently women's use of IPV and men's victimization is gaining growing attention. Earlier population-based studies performed in Sweden have primarily investigated men's violence against women, while women's use of violence and men's exposure as well as the existence of controlling behaviours have been neglected research areas This explorative study investigated the exposure to and perpetration of intimate partner violence, the use of control behaviours and the associated risk factors among a sample of Swedish men and women.

METHODS

This cross-sectional population-based study included 173 men and 251 women of age 18-65 randomly selected among the Swedish population. A questionnaire based on the revised Conflicts Tactics Scale (CTS2) and the subscale 'isolating control' from the Controlling Behaviour Scale (CBS) was used to collect data on violence exposure and perpetration. Regression analyses were used for risk factor assessment.

RESULTS

More men (11%) than women (8%) reported exposure to physical assault in the past year, while more women reported exposure to sexual coercion. Duration of present relationship ≤ 3 years was identified as a significant risk factor for men's exposure. Young age, lack of social support and being single, constituted risk factors for women's exposure. Surprisingly many men (37%) and women (41%) also reported exposure to controlling behaviours.

CONCLUSIONS

In partner violence research, both men's and women's exposure should be explored however findings need to be interpreted with caution. This first study in a Swedish sample establishes the basis for future investigations on partner violence and coercive control tactics.

摘要

背景

在过去的 30 年中,针对妇女的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)及其健康后果已成为一个成熟的研究领域,并且在世界范围内被公认为是一个重大的公共卫生问题。但是,针对男性的 IPV 研究却较少,然而最近,女性使用 IPV 和男性受害问题越来越受到关注。瑞典早期的基于人群的研究主要调查了男性对女性的暴力行为,而女性使用暴力行为以及男性受害和控制行为的存在则是被忽视的研究领域。本探索性研究调查了瑞典男性和女性样本中亲密伴侣暴力的暴露和实施、控制行为的使用以及相关的危险因素。

方法

本横断面基于人群的研究包括随机选择的年龄在 18-65 岁之间的 173 名男性和 251 名女性。使用基于修订后的冲突策略量表(CTS2)和控制行为量表(CBS)的“隔离控制”子量表的问卷收集有关暴力暴露和实施的数据。使用回归分析评估危险因素。

结果

更多的男性(11%)而不是女性(8%)报告在过去一年中遭受过身体攻击的暴露,而更多的女性报告遭受过性胁迫的暴露。目前的关系持续时间≤3 年被确定为男性暴露的重要危险因素。年轻,缺乏社会支持和单身是女性暴露的危险因素。令人惊讶的是,许多男性(37%)和女性(41%)也报告了控制行为的暴露。

结论

在伴侣暴力研究中,应探索男性和女性的暴露情况,但发现结果需要谨慎解释。这项在瑞典样本中的首次研究为未来有关伴侣暴力和强制性控制策略的研究奠定了基础。