• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预扩孔和锉型号对两种电子根尖定位仪准确性的影响。

Effect of pre-flaring and file size on the accuracy of two electronic apex locators.

机构信息

Inter-Institutional PhD Program, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):538-43. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000500008.

DOI:10.1590/s1678-77572012000500008
PMID:23138740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3881801/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This ex vivo study evaluated the effect of pre-flaring and file size on the accuracy of the Root ZX and Novapex electronic apex locators (EALs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The actual working length (WL) was set 1 mm short of the apical foramen in the palatal root canals of 24 extracted maxillary molars. The teeth were embedded in an alginate mold, and two examiners performed the electronic measurements using #10, #15, and #20 K-files. The files were inserted into the root canals until the "0.0" or "APEX" signals were observed on the LED or display screens for the Novapex and Root ZX, respectively, retracting to the 1.0 mark. The measurements were repeated after the preflaring using the S1 and SX Pro-Taper instruments. Two measurements were performed for each condition and the means were used. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to verify the intra- and inter-examiner agreement. The mean differences between the WL and electronic length values were analyzed by the three-way ANOVA test (p<0.05).

RESULTS

ICCs were high (>0.8) and the results demonstrated a similar accuracy for both EALs (p>0.05). Statistically significant accurate measurements were verified in the pre-flared canals, except for the Novapex using a #20 K-file.

CONCLUSIONS

The tested EALs showed acceptable accuracy, whereas the pre-flaring procedure revealed a more significant effect than the used file size.

摘要

目的

本离体研究评估了预扩口和锉型号对 Root ZX 和 Novapex 电子根尖定位仪(EAL)准确性的影响。

材料与方法

在 24 颗上颌磨牙腭侧根管中,将实际工作长度(WL)设置为比根尖孔短 1mm。牙齿嵌入藻酸盐模具中,两名检查者使用 #10、#15 和 #20 K 锉进行电子测量。将锉插入根管,直到 Novapex 和 Root ZX 的 LED 或显示屏上分别观察到“0.0”或“APEX”信号,然后回缩至 1.0 标记。在预扩口后使用 S1 和 SX Pro-Taper 器械重复测量。每种情况下进行两次测量,取平均值。计算组内相关系数(ICC)以验证检查者内和检查者间的一致性。使用三因素方差分析(p<0.05)分析 WL 和电子长度值之间的平均差异。

结果

ICC 较高(>0.8),结果表明两种 EAL 的准确性相似(p>0.05)。在预扩口的根管中验证了准确的测量,除了使用 #20 K 锉的 Novapex。

结论

测试的 EAL 显示出可接受的准确性,而预扩口程序的影响大于使用的锉型号。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b45/3881801/3942260ba79c/jaos-20-05-0538-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b45/3881801/9f460aec6a03/jaos-20-05-0538-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b45/3881801/e43a23a925ae/jaos-20-05-0538-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b45/3881801/3942260ba79c/jaos-20-05-0538-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b45/3881801/9f460aec6a03/jaos-20-05-0538-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b45/3881801/e43a23a925ae/jaos-20-05-0538-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b45/3881801/3942260ba79c/jaos-20-05-0538-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of pre-flaring and file size on the accuracy of two electronic apex locators.预扩孔和锉型号对两种电子根尖定位仪准确性的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):538-43. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000500008.
2
A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an ex vivo investigation.两种电子根尖定位仪的比较:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2007 May;40(5):362-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01229.x. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
3
Ex vivo evaluation of the ability of four different electronic apex locators to determine the working length in teeth with various foramen diameters.四种不同电子根尖定位仪在不同根尖孔直径牙齿中确定工作长度能力的体外评估。
Aust Dent J. 2006 Sep;51(3):258-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00439.x.
4
Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study.一种新型根尖定位仪的准确性:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2002 Feb;35(2):186-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00468.x.
5
The ability of two apex locators to locate the apical foramen: an in vitro study.两种根尖定位仪定位根尖孔的能力:一项体外研究。
J Endod. 2006 Jun;32(6):560-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.11.011. Epub 2006 Apr 4.
6
The accuracy of two electronic apex locators on effect of preflaring and file size: An study.两种电子根尖定位仪对预扩孔和锉尺寸效果的准确性:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;24(1):46-49. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_4_19. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
7
A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an in vivo investigation.两种电子根尖定位仪的比较:一项体内研究。
Int Endod J. 2005 Jan;38(1):36-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00899.x.
8
Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in the presence of different irrigating solutions.三种电子根尖定位仪在不同冲洗液中的准确性。
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Oct-Dec;24(4):394-8. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000400004.
9
Ex vivo accuracy of Root ZX II, Root ZX Mini and RomiApex A-15 apex locators in extracted vital pulp teeth.Root ZX II、Root ZX Mini和RomiApex A-15根尖定位仪在离体有活力牙髓牙中的体外准确性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 May 1;15(3):312-4. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1534.
10
In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of five different electronic apex locators for determining the working length of endodontically retreated teeth.五种不同电子根尖定位仪测定根管再治疗牙齿工作长度准确性的体外评估
Aust Endod J. 2007 Apr;33(1):7-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00049.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of sterilization on the cutting efficiency of two different rotary NiTi instruments (An In- vitro Study).灭菌对两种不同旋转镍钛器械切割效率的影响(一项体外研究)
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):1173. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06534-w.
2
Factors influencing the accuracy of electronic apex locators: A scoping review.影响电子根尖定位仪准确性的因素:一项范围综述。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Jun 27;22:26. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_634_23. eCollection 2025.
3
The Effect of Coronal Pre-flaring and Type of Root Canal Irrigation on Working Length Accuracy Using Electronic Apex Locators.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of pulp condition on the accuracy of an electronic foramen locator in posterior teeth: an in vivo study.牙髓状态对后牙电子根尖定位仪准确性的影响:一项体内研究。
Braz Oral Res. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(2):106-11.
2
An in vivo radiographic evaluation of the accuracy of Apex and iPex electronic Apex locators.
Braz Dent J. 2012;23(1):54-8. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000100010.
3
Critical diameter of apical foramen and of file size using the Root ZX apex locator: an in vitro study.根尖孔及根管锉尺寸的临界直径:根尖定位仪 Root ZX 的一项体外研究。
根管预备前牙本质预膨大和根管冲洗方式对电子根尖定位仪测量工作长度准确性的影响。
F1000Res. 2023 Oct 24;12:533. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133288.3. eCollection 2023.
4
The accuracy of two electronic apex locators on effect of preflaring and file size: An study.两种电子根尖定位仪对预扩孔和锉尺寸效果的准确性:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;24(1):46-49. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_4_19. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
5
Influence of Coronal Preflaring on the Accuracy of Electronic Working Length Determination: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠部预扩对电子工作长度确定准确性的影响:系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 23;10(13):2760. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132760.
6
The Precision of Propex Pixi with Different Instruments and Coronal Preflaring Procedures.使用不同器械和冠部预扩程序时Propex Pixi的精度
Eur Endod J. 2019 Jul 10;4(2):75-79. doi: 10.14744/eej.2019.52724. eCollection 2019.
7
Accuracy of five electronic foramen locators with different operating systems: an ex vivo study.五种不同操作系统的电子定位器准确性的比较:一项离体研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Mar-Apr;21(2):132-7. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757201302188.
J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1306-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.007. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
4
An ex vivo comparison of electronic apex locator teaching models.电子根尖定位仪教学模型的体外比较。
J Endod. 2011 Aug;37(8):1147-51. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.032. Epub 2011 May 13.
5
Evaluation of three instrumentation techniques at the precision of apical stop and apical sealing of obturation.评估三种仪器技术在根尖止点和根尖封闭的精度。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Aug;19(4):350-4. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572011005000009. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
6
Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study.三种电子根尖定位仪在前磨牙和后牙中的准确性:一项离体研究。
J Endod. 2011 May;37(5):684-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.011. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
7
Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators.比较 X 光片和四种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度。
Int Endod J. 2011 Jun;44(6):510-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01855.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
8
Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in the presence of different irrigating solutions.三种电子根尖定位仪在不同冲洗液中的准确性。
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Oct-Dec;24(4):394-8. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000400004.
9
The effect of cervical preflaring using different rotary nickel-titanium systems on the accuracy of apical file size determination.不同旋转镍钛系统行宫颈预扩对根管锉测量根尖孔尺寸准确性的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Oct;36(10):1669-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.017. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
10
Effectiveness of four electronic apex locators to determine distance from the apical foramen.四种电子根尖定位仪测量距根尖孔距离的准确性。
Int Endod J. 2010 Sep;43(9):808-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01765.x. Epub 2010 Aug 3.