Department of Food and Resource Economics, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012 Nov 13;8:43. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-8-43.
A large number of people in both developing and developed countries rely on medicinal plant products to maintain their health or treat illnesses. Available evidence suggests that medicinal plant consumption will remain stable or increase in the short to medium term. Knowledge on what factors determine medicinal plant consumption is, however, scattered across many disciplines, impeding, for example, systematic consideration of plant-based traditional medicine in national health care systems. The aim of the paper is to develop a conceptual framework for understanding medicinal plant consumption dynamics. Consumption is employed in the economic sense: use of medicinal plants by consumers or in the production of other goods.
PubMed and Web of Knowledge (formerly Web of Science) were searched using a set of medicinal plant key terms (folk/peasant/rural/traditional/ethno/indigenous/CAM/herbal/botanical/phytotherapy); each search terms was combined with terms related to medicinal plant consumption dynamics (medicinal plants/health care/preference/trade/treatment seeking behavior/domestication/sustainability/conservation/urban/migration/climate change/policy/production systems). To eliminate studies not directly focused on medicinal plant consumption, searches were limited by a number of terms (chemistry/clinical/in vitro/antibacterial/dose/molecular/trial/efficacy/antimicrobial/alkaloid/bioactive/inhibit/antibody/purification/antioxidant/DNA/rat/aqueous). A total of 1940 references were identified; manual screening for relevance reduced this to 645 relevant documents. As the conceptual framework emerged inductively, additional targeted literature searches were undertaken on specific factors and link, bringing the final number of references to 737.
The paper first defines the four main groups of medicinal plant users (1. Hunter-gatherers, 2. Farmers and pastoralists, 3. Urban and peri-urban people, 4. Entrepreneurs) and the three main types of benefits (consumer, producer, society-wide) derived from medicinal plants usage. Then a single unified conceptual framework for understanding the factors influencing medicinal plant consumption in the economic sense is proposed; the framework distinguishes four spatial levels of analysis (international, national, local, household) and identifies and describes 15 factors and their relationships.
The framework provides a basis for increasing our conceptual understanding of medicinal plant consumption dynamics, allows a positioning of existing studies, and can serve to guide future research in the area. This would inform the formation of future health and natural resource management policies.
许多发展中国家和发达国家的人都依赖药用植物产品来保持健康或治疗疾病。现有证据表明,在短期到中期内,药用植物的消费将保持稳定或增加。然而,关于哪些因素决定药用植物消费的知识分散在许多学科中,例如,妨碍了在国家卫生保健系统中系统地考虑基于植物的传统医学。本文的目的是开发一个理解药用植物消费动态的概念框架。消费在经济意义上是指消费者或在生产其他商品时使用药用植物。
使用一组药用植物关键词(民间/农民/农村/传统/民族/传统医学/草药/植物疗法)在 PubMed 和 Web of Knowledge(前身为 Web of Science)上进行搜索;每个搜索词都与药用植物消费动态相关的术语(药用植物/保健/偏好/贸易/治疗寻求行为/驯化/可持续性/保护/城市/移民/气候变化/政策/生产系统)相结合。为了消除不是直接关注药用植物消费的研究,通过一些术语对搜索进行了限制(化学/临床/体外/抗菌/剂量/分子/试验/疗效/抗菌/生物碱/生物活性/抑制/抗体/纯化/抗氧化剂/DNA/大鼠/水)。共确定了 1940 篇参考文献;手动筛选相关性将其减少到 645 篇相关文献。由于概念框架是通过归纳法出现的,因此对特定因素和联系进行了额外的有针对性的文献搜索,最终参考文献数量达到 737 篇。
本文首先定义了药用植物使用者的四个主要群体(1. 狩猎采集者,2. 农民和牧民,3. 城市和城郊居民,4. 企业家)和从药用植物使用中获得的三种主要收益(消费者、生产者、全社会)。然后提出了一个理解经济意义上药用植物消费的单一统一概念框架;该框架区分了四个空间分析层次(国际、国家、地方、家庭),并确定和描述了 15 个因素及其关系。
该框架为我们在理解药用植物消费动态方面提供了概念上的理解基础,使现有的研究能够定位,并可以指导该领域的未来研究。这将为未来的健康和自然资源管理政策提供信息。