• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的试验(CREST)中的卒中后。

Stroke after carotid stenting and endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).

机构信息

Calgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Circulation. 2012 Dec 18;126(25):3054-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.120030. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.120030
PMID:23159552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3638912/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke occurs more commonly after carotid artery stenting than after carotid endarterectomy. Details regarding stroke type, severity, and characteristics have not been reported previously. We describe the strokes that have occurred in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).

METHODS AND RESULTS

CREST is a randomized, open-allocation, controlled trial with blinded end-point adjudication. Stroke was a component of the primary composite outcome. Patients who received their assigned treatment within 30 days of randomization were included. Stroke was adjudicated by a panel of board-certified vascular neurologists with secondary central review of clinically obtained brain images. Stroke type, laterality, timing, and outcome were reported. A periprocedural stroke occurred among 81 of the 2502 patients randomized and among 69 of the 2272 in the present analysis. Strokes were predominantly minor (81%, n=56), ischemic (90%, n=62), in the anterior circulation (94%, n=65), and ipsilateral to the treated artery (88%, n=61). There were 7 hemorrhages, which occurred 3 to 21 days after the procedure, and 5 were fatal. Major stroke occurred in 13 (0.6%) of the 2272 patients. The estimated 4-year mortality after stroke was 21.1% compared with 11.6% for those without stroke. The adjusted risk of death at 4 years was higher after periprocedural stroke (hazard ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-4.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke, particularly severe stroke, was uncommon after carotid intervention in CREST, but stroke was associated with significant morbidity and was independently associated with a nearly 3-fold increased future mortality. The delayed timing of major and hemorrhagic stroke after revascularization suggests that these strokes may be preventable.

摘要

背景

颈动脉支架置入术后比颈动脉内膜切除术更常发生中风。以前没有报告过中风类型、严重程度和特征的详细信息。我们描述了发生在颈动脉血管重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)中的中风。

方法和结果

CREST 是一项随机、开放分配、对照试验,终点判断设盲。中风是主要复合终点的一个组成部分。在随机分组后 30 天内接受指定治疗的患者被纳入。中风由一组经过董事会认证的血管神经科医生进行裁决,并对临床获得的脑部图像进行二次中心审查。报告了中风类型、偏侧性、时间和结果。2502 名随机患者中有 81 名和 2272 名本分析患者中有 69 名发生了围手术期中风。中风主要为轻度(81%,n=56)、缺血性(90%,n=62)、前循环(94%,n=65)和治疗动脉同侧(88%,n=61)。有 7 例出血,发生在手术后 3 至 21 天,其中 5 例为致命性。主要中风发生在 2272 名患者中的 13 名(0.6%)。与无中风的患者相比,中风后 4 年的死亡率估计为 21.1%。4 年后死亡的调整风险在围手术期中风后更高(风险比,2.78;95%置信区间,1.63-4.76)。

结论

在 CREST 中,颈动脉介入治疗后中风,特别是严重中风并不常见,但中风与显著的发病率有关,且与近 3 倍的未来死亡率增加独立相关。再血管化后发生的大卒中和出血性卒中的延迟时间提示这些卒中可能是可预防的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/031e/3638912/81683e943b89/nihms-427680-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/031e/3638912/c1aa58937d74/nihms-427680-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/031e/3638912/99be961bd137/nihms-427680-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/031e/3638912/229bc398262d/nihms-427680-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/031e/3638912/81683e943b89/nihms-427680-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/031e/3638912/c1aa58937d74/nihms-427680-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/031e/3638912/99be961bd137/nihms-427680-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/031e/3638912/229bc398262d/nihms-427680-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/031e/3638912/81683e943b89/nihms-427680-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Stroke after carotid stenting and endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的试验(CREST)中的卒中后。
Circulation. 2012 Dec 18;126(25):3054-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.120030. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
2
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
3
The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST): stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for carotid disease.颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST):颈动脉疾病的支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术比较。
Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10 Suppl):S31-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595330.
4
Influence of multiple stents on periprocedural stroke after carotid artery stenting in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄试验(CREST)中,颈动脉支架置入术后多发性支架对围手术期卒中的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.221. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
5
Duration of asymptomatic status and outcomes following carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial.无症状状态持续时间和颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术在颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验中的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1797-1800. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.054. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
6
Influence of sex on outcomes of stenting versus endarterectomy: a subgroup analysis of the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).性别对支架置入与内膜切除术治疗效果的影响:Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial(CREST)的亚组分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jun;10(6):530-7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70080-1. Epub 2011 May 5.
7
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
8
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.症状性重度颈动脉狭窄患者内膜切除术与血管成形术对比研究(EVA-3S)试验:一项随机多中心试验的4年随访结果
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
9
Restenosis after carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy: a secondary analysis of CREST, a randomised controlled trial.颈动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术治疗后再狭窄:CREST 随机对照试验的二次分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2012 Sep;11(9):755-63. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70159-X. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
10
Safety of stenting and endarterectomy by symptomatic status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)中症状状态对支架置入和内膜切除术安全性的影响。
Stroke. 2011 Mar;42(3):675-80. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.610212. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
[Stenting of the extracranial internal carotid artery].[颅外颈内动脉支架置入术]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2025 Mar;66(3):274-282. doi: 10.1007/s00108-025-01873-w. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
2
What the National Coverage Determination for Carotid Artery Stenting Means for the Treatment of Patients with Carotid Artery Disease.《颈动脉支架置入术的国家医保覆盖范围判定对颈动脉疾病患者治疗的意义》
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Apr;113:337-345. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.09.037. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
3
Comparative on the effectiveness and safety of different carotid endarterectomy techniques: a single-center Retrospective Study.不同颈动脉内膜切除术技术效果和安全性的比较:单中心回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jun 20;19(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02838-0.
4
One-Year Outcomes of CGuard Double Mesh Stent in Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颈动脉疾病中 CGuard 双网支架的一年结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 8;60(2):286. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020286.
5
Carotid artery interventions - endarterectomy versus stenting.颈动脉介入治疗——内膜切除术与支架置入术
AsiaIntervention. 2023 Sep 21;9(2):172-179. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00009. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Delayed Migration of Tapered Open-Cell Design Carotid Stent: A Case Report.锥形开孔设计颈动脉支架的延迟移位:一例报告。
Neurointervention. 2023 Nov;18(3):204-208. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2023.00304. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
7
Prospective Observational Study after Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy with Ultrasound-Guided Deep-Intermediate Cervical Plexus Blockade.外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术联合超声引导下颈深-中丛神经阻滞的前瞻性观察研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Oct 10;10(10):1986. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101986.
8
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.第二代与第一代颈动脉支架的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819.
9
Caloric restriction overcomes pre-diabetes and hypertension induced by a high fat diet and renal artery stenosis.热量限制可克服高脂肪饮食和肾动脉狭窄引起的前驱糖尿病和高血压。
Mol Biol Rep. 2022 Jul;49(7):5883-5895. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07370-9. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
10
Computed Tomography Texture Analysis of Carotid Plaque as Predictor of Unfavorable Outcome after Carotid Artery Stenting: A Preliminary Study.颈动脉斑块的计算机断层扫描纹理分析作为颈动脉支架置入术后不良结局的预测指标:一项初步研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 27;11(12):2214. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122214.

本文引用的文献

1
Age and outcomes after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的年龄与结局:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验。
Stroke. 2011 Dec;42(12):3484-90. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.624155. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
2
Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.颅内动脉狭窄的血管内支架置入与积极药物治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
3
Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease: executive summary.美国血管外科学会更新的颅外颈动脉疾病管理指南:执行摘要。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):832-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.004.
4
Fire in the hole: carotid stenting versus endarterectomy.注意:有危险!颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的比较
Circulation. 2011 Jun 7;123(22):2522-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.034314. Epub 2011 May 23.
5
Myocardial infarction after carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.颈动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术治疗心肌梗死:来自颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验的结果。
Circulation. 2011 Jun 7;123(22):2571-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.008250. Epub 2011 May 23.
6
Age modifies the relative risk of stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis--a pooled analysis of EVA-3S, SPACE and ICSS.年龄改变了症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的相对风险——EVA-3S、SPACE 和 ICSS 的汇总分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;41(2):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
7
10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial.成功颈动脉内膜切除术治疗无症状狭窄后 10 年的卒中预防(ACST-1):一项多中心随机试验。
Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1074-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61197-X.
8
Lessons from carotid endarterectomy and stenting trials.颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术试验的经验教训。
Lancet. 2010 Sep 25;376(9746):1028-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61415-8.
9
Carotid-artery stenting in stroke prevention.颈动脉支架置入术预防卒中
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):80-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1005220. Epub 2010 May 26.
10
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.