• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在道德和社会规范规范背景下的内群体和外群体判断的发展。

Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms.

机构信息

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2013 May-Jun;84(3):1063-80. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12011. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.12011
PMID:23163757
Abstract

Children and adolescents evaluated group inclusion and exclusion in the context of generic and group-specific norms involving morality and social conventions. Participants (N = 381), aged 9.5 and 13.5 years, judged an in-group member's decision to deviate from the norms of the group, whom to include, and whether their personal preference was the same as what they expected a group should do. Deviating from in-group moral norms about unequal allocation of resources was viewed more positively than deviating from conventional norms about nontraditional dress codes. With age, participants gave priority to group-specific norms and differentiated what the group should do from their own preference about the group's decision, revealing a developmental picture about children's complex understanding of group dynamics and group norms.

摘要

儿童和青少年在涉及道德和社会习俗的一般和群体特定规范的背景下评估群体的纳入和排除。参与者(N=381)年龄为 9.5 岁和 13.5 岁,他们判断一个群体成员偏离群体规范、包括谁以及他们的个人偏好是否与他们预期的群体应该做的一样的决定。与偏离关于非传统着装规范的传统规范相比,偏离关于资源不平等分配的群体道德规范受到更积极的评价。随着年龄的增长,参与者优先考虑群体特定的规范,并区分群体应该做的事情和他们自己对群体决策的偏好,这揭示了儿童对群体动态和群体规范的复杂理解的发展情况。

相似文献

1
Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms.在道德和社会规范规范背景下的内群体和外群体判断的发展。
Child Dev. 2013 May-Jun;84(3):1063-80. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12011. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
2
Context differences in children's ingroup preferences.儿童内群体偏好的情境差异。
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1507-19. doi: 10.1037/a0035593. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
3
Children's judgments of disloyal and immoral peer behavior: subjective group dynamics in minimal intergroup contexts.儿童对同伴不忠诚和不道德行为的判断:最小群体情境中的主观群体动态
Child Dev. 2008 Mar-Apr;79(2):444-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01135.x.
4
Moral judgments and emotions: adolescents' evaluations in intergroup social exclusion contexts.道德判断与情感:青少年在群体间社会排斥情境中的评价
New Dir Youth Dev. 2012 Winter;2012(136):41-57, 8-9. doi: 10.1002/yd.20037.
5
Social groups and children's intergroup attitudes: can school norms moderate the effects of social group norms?社会群体与儿童的群际态度:学校规范能否调节社会群体规范的影响?
Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1594-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01637.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
6
Children's group nous: understanding and applying peer exclusion within and between groups.儿童群体意识:理解并应用群体内部和群体之间的同伴排斥现象。
Child Dev. 2009 Jan-Feb;80(1):224-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01256.x.
7
Young children's inclusion decisions in moral and social-conventional group norm contexts.幼儿在道德和社会习俗群体规范背景下的包容决策。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:19-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
8
Children's evaluations of resource allocation in the context of group norms.儿童在群体规范背景下对资源分配的评价。
Dev Psychol. 2015 Apr;51(4):554-63. doi: 10.1037/a0038796. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
9
Children's and Adolescents' Expectations about Challenging Unfair Group Norms.儿童和青少年对挑战不公平群体规范的期望。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Oct;46(10):2241-2253. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0671-y. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
10
Danish majority children's reasoning about exclusion based on gender and ethnicity.丹麦多数儿童对基于性别和种族的排斥的推理。
Child Dev. 2011 Mar-Apr;82(2):520-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01568.x. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of theory of mind, group norms and intentionality in children's and adolescents' moral evaluations of a misinformer.心理理论、群体规范和意向性在儿童及青少年对误导者的道德评价中的作用
Br J Dev Psychol. 2025 Sep;43(3):562-577. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12544. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Children's and adolescents' expectations, evaluations and reasoning about a bystander who challenges social exclusion within intragroup and intergroup peer contexts.儿童和青少年对于在群体内和群体间同伴情境中挑战社会排斥的旁观者的期望、评价和推理。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2025 Mar;43(1):67-81. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12522. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
3
"Some people will tell jokes to you; some people be racist:" A mixed-method examination of racist jokes and adolescents' well-being.
“有些人会给你讲笑话;有些人会有种族主义:”一项混合方法研究种族主义笑话与青少年福祉的关系。
Child Dev. 2024 Sep-Oct;95(5):1572-1585. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14095. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
Children's and adolescents' evaluations of wealth-related STEM inequality.儿童和青少年对与财富相关的STEM不平等的评估。
Soc Dev. 2024 Feb;33(1):e12710. doi: 10.1111/sode.12710. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
5
Adolescents' Evaluations of those who Challenge Exclusive and Inclusive Peer Norms.青少年对挑战排他性和包容性同伴规范者的评价。
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2023 Mar-Apr;33(2):236-251. doi: 10.1002/casp.2638. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
6
Gender Stereotypes and Peer Selection in STEM Domains Among Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年在STEM领域中的性别刻板印象与同伴选择
Sex Roles. 2022;87(9-10):455-470. doi: 10.1007/s11199-022-01327-9. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
7
When do bystanders get help from teachers or friends? Age and group membership matter when indirectly challenging social exclusion.旁观者何时能从老师或朋友那里获得帮助?在间接挑战社会排斥时,年龄和群体成员身份很重要。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 30;13:833589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833589. eCollection 2022.
8
British Adolescents Are More Likely Than Children to Support Bystanders Who Challenge Exclusion of Immigrant Peers.与儿童相比,英国青少年更有可能支持那些挑战排斥移民同龄人的旁观者。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 8;13:837276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837276. eCollection 2022.
9
To Punish or Exclude? Children's Responses to Unfair and Fair Advantages Created in Competitive Contexts.惩罚还是排斥?儿童对竞争情境中产生的不公平和公平优势的反应。
Cogn Dev. 2022 Apr-Jun;62. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101168. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
10
Children and Adolescents' Ingroup Biases and Developmental Differences in Evaluations of Peers Who Misinform.儿童和青少年在对提供错误信息的同伴的评价中的内群体偏见及发展差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 15;13:835695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835695. eCollection 2022.