• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理理论、群体规范和意向性在儿童及青少年对误导者的道德评价中的作用

The role of theory of mind, group norms and intentionality in children's and adolescents' moral evaluations of a misinformer.

作者信息

Farooq Aqsa, Adlam Anna, Rutland Adam

机构信息

University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Br J Dev Psychol. 2025 Sep;43(3):562-577. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12544. Epub 2024 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1111/bjdp.12544
PMID:39714154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12351214/
Abstract

Misinformation poses a significant threat to modern society. Children and adolescents, highly active on social media, are particularly vulnerable to encountering misinformation from peers. Assessing whether intentionality impacts moral evaluations of misinformers, considering age and group norms, is crucial. Theory of Mind (ToM) plays a key role in understanding false beliefs and intentions. In a study involving 266 UK-based children (8-11-years-old) and adolescents (12-15-years-old), participants evaluated a misinformer in a scenario involving a school competition. Deliberate misinformation led to harsher judgements and a higher likelihood of punishment. However, children tended to be more inclusive than adolescents regardless of intentionality. Adolescents with higher ToM believed in the misinformation less. Higher ToM correlated with harsher misinformer evaluations across the sample. These findings underscore the impact of intentionality, ToM and age on moral evaluations, suggesting that high ToM may mitigate positive feelings towards misinformers, potentially reducing misinformation acceptance.

摘要

错误信息对现代社会构成了重大威胁。儿童和青少年在社交媒体上非常活跃,特别容易从同龄人那里接触到错误信息。考虑到年龄和群体规范,评估意图是否会影响对错误信息传播者的道德评价至关重要。心理理论(ToM)在理解错误信念和意图方面起着关键作用。在一项涉及266名英国儿童(8至11岁)和青少年(12至15岁)的研究中,参与者在一个涉及学校竞赛的场景中对一名错误信息传播者进行了评估。故意传播错误信息会导致更严厉的判断和更高的惩罚可能性。然而,无论意图如何,儿童往往比青少年更具包容性。心理理论水平较高的青少年对错误信息的信任度较低。在整个样本中,较高的心理理论水平与对错误信息传播者更严厉的评价相关。这些发现强调了意图、心理理论和年龄对道德评价的影响,表明较高的心理理论水平可能会减轻对错误信息传播者的好感,从而有可能减少对错误信息的接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fa/12351214/6339a3f16b7a/BJDP-43-562-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fa/12351214/6339a3f16b7a/BJDP-43-562-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4fa/12351214/6339a3f16b7a/BJDP-43-562-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of theory of mind, group norms and intentionality in children's and adolescents' moral evaluations of a misinformer.心理理论、群体规范和意向性在儿童及青少年对误导者的道德评价中的作用
Br J Dev Psychol. 2025 Sep;43(3):562-577. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12544. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Enhancing social-emotional functioning in adolescents with developmental language disorder or deaf or hard of hearing through a Theory of Mind intervention.通过心理理论干预提高发育性语言障碍或聋或重听青少年的社会情感功能。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1436-1451. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13011. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
3
If someone is wrong but sincere, is it a lie? The role of objective falsity, intention, and in children's understanding of lying.如果一个人说错了但却是真诚的,这算是说谎吗?客观虚假、意图以及它们在儿童对说谎理解中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2025 Dec;260:106350. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106350. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
4
Interventions based on the Theory of Mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).基于心理理论认知模型对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 21;2014(3):CD008785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008785.pub2.
5
Theory of Mind in Patients with Epilepsy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.癫痫患者的心理理论:系统评价与荟萃分析
Neuropsychol Rev. 2016 Mar;26(1):3-24. doi: 10.1007/s11065-015-9313-x. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Motor and socio-cognitive mechanisms explaining peers' synchronization of joint action across development in autistic and non-autistic children.解释自闭症和非自闭症儿童在发育过程中同伴联合行动同步性的运动和社会认知机制。
Autism. 2025 Mar 26:13623613251328437. doi: 10.1177/13623613251328437.
7
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
8
A transdiagnostic study of theory of mind in children and youth with neurodevelopmental conditions.一项针对患有神经发育障碍的儿童和青少年心理理论的跨诊断研究。
Mol Autism. 2025 Jul 20;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13229-025-00671-3.
9
Children's reaction to unequal norm enforcement: The role of meta-norms in fairness judgments and emotion attributions.儿童对不平等规范执行的反应:元规范在公平判断和情绪归因中的作用。
Cognition. 2025 Oct;263:106197. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106197. Epub 2025 May 27.
10
Adolescents' and Young Adults' Perceptions of a Pop-Up Aimed at Combating the Spread of E-Cigarette Misinformation on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.青少年和青年对旨在抵制电子烟错误信息在社交媒体上传播的弹出式窗口的认知:横断面调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 19;9:e73193. doi: 10.2196/73193.

本文引用的文献

1
Children and Adolescents' Ingroup Biases and Developmental Differences in Evaluations of Peers Who Misinform.儿童和青少年在对提供错误信息的同伴的评价中的内群体偏见及发展差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 15;13:835695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835695. eCollection 2022.
2
Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts.在竞争环境中,不准确的群体元认知会导致对负面外部群体的归因。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Mar;4(3):279-286. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0766-4. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
The Capricious Nature of Theory of Mind: Does Mental State Understanding Depend on the Characteristics of the Target?
心理理论的多变性:对心理状态的理解是否取决于目标的特征?
Child Dev. 2020 Mar;91(2):e280-e298. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13223. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
4
The role of intergroup biases in children's endorsement of information about novel individuals.群体间偏见在儿童对新个体信息的认可中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Mar;179:291-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
5
Unintentional and intentional falsehoods: The role of morally relevant theory of mind.非故意和故意谎言:道德相关心理理论的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jan;177:53-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
The Role of Competitive and Cooperative Norms in the Development of Deviant Evaluations.竞争与合作规范在偏差评价发展中的作用。
Child Dev. 2019 Nov;90(6):e703-e717. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13094. Epub 2018 May 20.
7
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
8
The Whistleblower's Dilemma in Young Children: When Loyalty Trumps Other Moral Concerns.幼儿中的举报人困境:当忠诚超越其他道德考量时。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 1;9:250. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00250. eCollection 2018.
9
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief.《党派大脑:基于身份认同的政治信仰模式》
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;22(3):213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
10
Modeling confirmation bias and polarization.建模确认偏误和极化。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 11;7:40391. doi: 10.1038/srep40391.