• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年对挑战不公平群体规范的期望。

Children's and Adolescents' Expectations about Challenging Unfair Group Norms.

机构信息

Department of Educational Studies, University of South Carolina, 129 Wardlaw, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Dept of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, 3942 Campus Drive, Suite 3304, College Park, MD, 20742-1131, USA.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Oct;46(10):2241-2253. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0671-y. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-017-0671-y
PMID:28389840
Abstract

Youth often hold group norms that perpetuate inequality. One way these norms can be changed is by challenging these norms by choosing to include new members into these groups who hold morally just norms. In the current study, children's and adolescents' inclusion decisions and social reasoning about challenging group norms through inclusion were investigated. The sample included 9-10 (children) and 13-14 year-olds (adolescents) (N = 673, 54.4% female). Participants supported including challengers into groups holding norms supporting relational aggression and unequal allocation of resources, but they were less likely to support including a challenger into a physically aggressive group. Age-related differences and gender differences were found: children and female participants were more likely to include challengers than were adolescents and male participants. The findings indicate that youth support including new members who would challenge morally questionable group norms, but that their support depends on the specific norm the group holds.

摘要

年轻人常常持有使不平等永久化的群体规范。改变这些规范的一种方法是通过选择将持有道德公正规范的新成员纳入这些群体来挑战这些规范。在当前的研究中,通过纳入来研究儿童和青少年的包容决策和关于挑战群体规范的社会推理。样本包括 9-10 岁(儿童)和 13-14 岁(青少年)(N=673,54.4%为女性)。参与者支持将挑战者纳入支持关系攻击和不平等资源分配的规范的群体中,但他们不太可能支持将挑战者纳入身体攻击群体中。发现了与年龄相关的差异和性别差异:儿童和女性参与者比青少年和男性参与者更有可能接纳挑战者。研究结果表明,年轻人支持接纳新成员,这些新成员将挑战道德上有问题的群体规范,但他们的支持取决于群体持有的具体规范。

相似文献

1
Children's and Adolescents' Expectations about Challenging Unfair Group Norms.儿童和青少年对挑战不公平群体规范的期望。
J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Oct;46(10):2241-2253. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0671-y. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
2
Keeping Quiet Just Wouldn't be Right: Children's and Adolescents' Evaluations of Challenges to Peer Relational and Physical Aggression.保持沉默是不对的:儿童和青少年对同伴关系挑战及身体攻击行为的评估
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Sep;45(9):1824-35. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0437-y. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
3
Young children's inclusion decisions in moral and social-conventional group norm contexts.幼儿在道德和社会习俗群体规范背景下的包容决策。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:19-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
4
Development of intra- and intergroup judgments in the context of moral and social-conventional norms.在道德和社会规范规范背景下的内群体和外群体判断的发展。
Child Dev. 2013 May-Jun;84(3):1063-80. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12011. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
5
The role of in-group norms and group status in children's and adolescents' decisions to rectify resource inequalities.群体规范和群体地位在儿童和青少年决定纠正资源不平等中的作用。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep;37(3):309-322. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12274. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
6
Social group norms, school norms, and children's aggressive intentions.社会群体规范、学校规范与儿童的攻击意图。
Aggress Behav. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):195-204. doi: 10.1002/ab.20342.
7
Moral judgments and emotions: adolescents' evaluations in intergroup social exclusion contexts.道德判断与情感:青少年在群体间社会排斥情境中的评价
New Dir Youth Dev. 2012 Winter;2012(136):41-57, 8-9. doi: 10.1002/yd.20037.
8
Children's expectations about conventional and moral behaviors of ingroup and outgroup members.儿童对群体内和群体外成员的传统及道德行为的期望。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
9
Context differences in children's ingroup preferences.儿童内群体偏好的情境差异。
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1507-19. doi: 10.1037/a0035593. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
10
Social groups and children's intergroup attitudes: can school norms moderate the effects of social group norms?社会群体与儿童的群际态度:学校规范能否调节社会群体规范的影响?
Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1594-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01637.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's Reasoning about Challenging Social Exclusion of Peers with Learning Difficulties.儿童对具有学习困难的同伴遭受挑战性社会排斥的推理。
Int J Behav Dev. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1177/01650254251348216.
2
Adolescents' Evaluations of those who Challenge Exclusive and Inclusive Peer Norms.青少年对挑战排他性和包容性同伴规范者的评价。
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2023 Mar-Apr;33(2):236-251. doi: 10.1002/casp.2638. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
3
When do bystanders get help from teachers or friends? Age and group membership matter when indirectly challenging social exclusion.

本文引用的文献

1
A Developmental Neuroscience Study of Moral Decision Making Regarding Resource Allocation.资源分配道德决策的发展神经科学研究。
Child Dev. 2018 Jul;89(4):1177-1192. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12698. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
2
Bullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention.将霸凌参与者角色和性别作为旁观者干预行为的预测因素。
Aggress Behav. 2017 May;43(3):281-290. doi: 10.1002/ab.21688. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
3
Race-Based Humor and Peer Group Dynamics in Adolescence: Bystander Intervention and Social Exclusion.青少年中基于种族的幽默与同伴群体动态:旁观者干预与社会排斥
旁观者何时能从老师或朋友那里获得帮助?在间接挑战社会排斥时,年龄和群体成员身份很重要。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 30;13:833589. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833589. eCollection 2022.
4
Inclusion of Refugee Peers - Differences Between Own Preferences and Expectations of the Peer Group.纳入难民同龄人——自身偏好与同龄人期望之间的差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 8;13:855171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.855171. eCollection 2022.
5
Social Inclusion of Refugee and Native Peers Among Adolescents: It is the Language that Matters!青少年中难民与本地同龄人之间的社会融合:关键在于语言!
J Res Adolesc. 2020 Mar;30(1):219-233. doi: 10.1111/jora.12518. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
Child Dev. 2016 Sep;87(5):1379-91. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12600.
4
Rectifying social inequalities in a resource allocation task.纠正资源分配任务中的社会不平等现象。
Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
5
Keeping Quiet Just Wouldn't be Right: Children's and Adolescents' Evaluations of Challenges to Peer Relational and Physical Aggression.保持沉默是不对的:儿童和青少年对同伴关系挑战及身体攻击行为的评估
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Sep;45(9):1824-35. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0437-y. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Money, Peers and Parents: Social and Economic Aspects of Inequality in Youth Wellbeing.金钱、同龄人及父母:青少年幸福不平等的社会与经济因素
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Jul;45(7):1294-308. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0430-5. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
7
Peer Influence, Peer Status, and Prosocial Behavior: An Experimental Investigation of Peer Socialization of Adolescents' Intentions to Volunteer.同伴影响、同伴地位与亲社会行为:青少年志愿服务意愿同伴社会化的实验研究
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Dec;44(12):2197-210. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0373-2. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
8
A New Social-Cognitive Developmental Perspective on Prejudice: The Interplay Between Morality and Group Identity.一种新的社会认知发展视角下的偏见:道德与群体认同的相互作用。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 May;5(3):279-91. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369468.
9
Expectations About Ethnic Peer Group Inclusivity: The Role of Shared Interests, Group Norms, and Stereotypes.对族裔同伴群体包容性的期望:共同兴趣、群体规范和刻板印象的作用。
Child Dev. 2015 Sep-Oct;86(5):1522-37. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12393. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
Relations Between Actual Group Norms, Perceived Peer Behavior, and Bystander Children's Intervention to Bullying.实际群体规范、同伴行为认知与旁观者儿童对欺凌行为的干预之间的关系。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017 May-Jun;46(3):394-400. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1046180. Epub 2015 Jun 25.