Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2013 Feb 1;288(5):2986-93. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.386573. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
Paradoxically, the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 both activate STAT3, yet generate nearly opposing cellular responses. Here, we show that the temporal pattern of STAT3 activation codes for the specific cytokine response. A computational model of IL-6 and IL-10 signaling predicted that IL-6 stimulation results in transient activation of STAT3, with a rapid decline in phosphorylation and nuclear localization. In contrast, simulated IL-10 signaling resulted in sustained STAT3 activation. The predicted STAT3 patterns produced by each cytokine were confirmed experimentally in human dendritic cells. Time course microarray studies further showed that the dynamic genome-wide transcriptional responses were nearly identical at early time points following stimulation (when STAT3 is active in response to both IL-6 and IL-10) but divergent at later times (when STAT3 is active only in response to IL-10). Truncating STAT3 activation after IL-10 stimulation caused IL-10 to elicit an IL-6-like transcriptional and secretory response. That the duration of IL-10 receptor and STAT3 activation can direct distinct responses reveals a complex cellular information-coding mechanism that may be relevant to improving the prediction of the effects of drug candidates using this mechanism.
矛盾的是,促炎细胞因子 IL-6 和抗炎细胞因子 IL-10 都能激活 STAT3,但却产生了几乎相反的细胞反应。在这里,我们表明 STAT3 的激活模式为特定的细胞因子反应编码。IL-6 和 IL-10 信号的计算模型预测,IL-6 刺激会导致 STAT3 的短暂激活,磷酸化和核定位迅速下降。相比之下,模拟的 IL-10 信号导致 STAT3 的持续激活。每种细胞因子产生的预测 STAT3 模式在人类树突状细胞中得到了实验验证。时间进程微阵列研究进一步表明,在刺激后早期(当 STAT3 对 IL-6 和 IL-10 都有反应时),动态全基因组转录反应几乎相同,但在后期(当 STAT3 仅对 IL-10 有反应时)则不同。在 IL-10 刺激后截断 STAT3 激活会导致 IL-10 引发类似于 IL-6 的转录和分泌反应。IL-10 受体和 STAT3 激活的持续时间可以指导不同的反应,这揭示了一种复杂的细胞信息编码机制,这可能与使用这种机制来提高对候选药物效果的预测有关。