• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Socket愈合是否受颊板厚度的影响?矿化同种异体骨移植后 4 个月的临床和组织学研究。

Is socket healing conditioned by buccal plate thickness? A clinical and histologic study 4 months after mineralized human bone allografting.

机构信息

Private Practice, Sassuolo, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):e120-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12073. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1111/clr.12073
PMID:23167308
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to clinically and histologically analyze the healing of grafted sockets by mineralized human bone allograft (MHBA) and nongrafted sockets, correlating the results with buccal plate thickness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-one sockets were randomly split into control (CG) and treatment (MHBA grafted) (TG) groups and, subsequently, into four subgroups according to buccal plate thickness: a ≤ 1 mm and b > 1 mm. Ridge thickness, depth, and height were monitored. Four months after, at implant placement, a bone core biopsy for histologic and morphometric analyses was taken.

RESULTS

The differences of buccal height (TG-a -0.27 and CG-a -1.17 mm) and width (TG-a 0.55 and CG-a 2.67 mm, TG-b 0.12 and CG-b 1.17 mm) were statistically significant. The increase in bone amount CG-b (28.17%) compared with CG-a (16.98%) was statistically significant. Soft tissue amount of TG-b (54.21%) and TG-a (56.91%) was lower than that of CG-b (71.83%) and CG-a (83.01%), both being statistically significant (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The results proved that thin buccal plates had a worse outcome on socket healing and that network formation by MBHA not only predisposes a successful implant insertion but also acts as size keeper.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过分析矿化同种异体人骨移植物(MHBA)和未移植牙槽窝的临床和组织学愈合情况,并与颊板厚度相关联,来评估其临床效果。

材料和方法

31 个牙槽窝被随机分为对照组(CG)和治疗组(MHBA 移植)(TG),并根据颊板厚度进一步分为四个亚组:a≤1mm 和 b>1mm。监测牙槽嵴厚度、深度和高度。4 个月后,在种植体植入时,进行骨芯活检以进行组织学和形态计量学分析。

结果

在颊侧高度(TG-a-0.27 和 CG-a-1.17mm)和宽度(TG-a0.55 和 CG-a2.67mm,TG-b0.12 和 CG-b1.17mm)方面,差异具有统计学意义。与 CG-a(16.98%)相比,CG-b(28.17%)的骨量增加具有统计学意义。与 CG-b(71.83%)和 CG-a(83.01%)相比,TG-b(54.21%)和 TG-a(56.91%)的软组织量较低,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.002)。

结论

结果表明,薄颊板对牙槽窝愈合的结果更差,而 MHBA 的网状形成不仅有利于成功植入种植体,而且还起到尺寸保持的作用。

相似文献

1
Is socket healing conditioned by buccal plate thickness? A clinical and histologic study 4 months after mineralized human bone allografting.Socket愈合是否受颊板厚度的影响?矿化同种异体骨移植后 4 个月的临床和组织学研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):e120-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12073. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
2
Histologic healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus combined mineralized-demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial.使用矿化与矿化-脱矿冻干骨同种异体移植进行牙槽嵴保存的拔牙后组织学愈合:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2015 Mar;86(3):348-55. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140483. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
3
Ridge preservation with or without an osteoinductive allograft: a clinical, radiographic, micro-computed tomography, and histologic study evaluating dimensional changes and new bone formation of the alveolar ridge.引导骨组织再生术联合或不联合骨诱导同种异体移植物:一项评估牙槽嵴的尺寸变化和新骨形成的临床、放射学、微计算机断层扫描和组织学研究。
J Periodontol. 2012 May;83(5):581-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110365. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
4
Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.无瓣牙拔除术后牙槽窝植骨的临床和组织学结果:随机对照临床试验的系统评价
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 May;113(5):371-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
5
Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans: a comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing.人类拔牙窝的组织变化:自发愈合与采用二期软组织愈合的牙槽嵴保存的比较
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1231-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02535.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
6
Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft.对比使用矿化冻干骨与脱矿冻干骨进行牙槽嵴保存术后拔牙创口愈合的组织学表现。
J Periodontol. 2012 Mar;83(3):329-36. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110270. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
7
Clinical evaluation of a ridge augmentation procedure for the severely resorbed alveolar socket: multicenter randomized controlled trial, preliminary results.一种严重吸收牙槽窝的牙槽嵴增高术的临床评估:多中心随机对照试验,初步结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):526-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02386.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
8
Piezosurgical treatment of crestal bone: quantitative comparison of post-extractive socket outcomes with those of traditional treatment.牙槽嵴骨的压电外科治疗:拔牙后牙槽窝治疗效果与传统治疗的定量比较。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Mar;27(3):361-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12555. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
9
Ridge preservation comparing socket allograft alone to socket allograft plus facial overlay xenograft: a clinical and histologic study in humans.比较单独使用牙槽骨移植与牙槽骨移植加面部覆盖异种移植物的牙槽嵴保存:一项人类临床和组织学研究。
J Periodontol. 2013 Nov;84(11):1567-75. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120585. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
10
Evaluation of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using cortical versus cancellous freeze-dried bone allograft.使用皮质骨与松质骨冻干同种异体骨进行牙槽嵴保存的拔牙后愈合情况评估。
J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):514-24. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130178. Epub 2013 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Socket Preservation Technique Using Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Materials-A Preliminary Study.使用同种异体和异种材料的牙槽窝保存技术有效性评估——一项初步研究。
J Funct Biomater. 2025 May 23;16(6):192. doi: 10.3390/jfb16060192.
2
Clinical and Histologic Outcomes of Biologically Oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Prospective Observational Study.生物导向性牙槽嵴保存的临床和组织学结果:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70048. doi: 10.1111/cid.70048.
3
Tailoring and characterization of bioactive graft material for alveolar bone preservation and regeneration in fresh extraction sockets of dog model.
用于犬模型新鲜拔牙窝牙槽骨保存与再生的生物活性移植材料的定制与表征
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 27;15(1):3321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86408-x.
4
Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation, Dimensional Changes, and Residual Particles in Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques Using InterOss® Anorganic Cancellous Bone Graft: A Longitudinal Study.使用InterOss®无机松质骨移植材料的牙槽嵴保存技术中新生骨形成、尺寸变化及残余颗粒的组织形态计量学评估:一项纵向研究
Int J Dent. 2024 May 15;2024:3263011. doi: 10.1155/2024/3263011. eCollection 2024.
5
Clinical outcomes of using operating microscope for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled trial.使用手术显微镜进行牙槽嵴保存的临床效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Periodontol. 2025 Mar;96(3):230-240. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0081. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
6
Autologous platelet concentrates in alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review with meta-analyses.自体血小板浓缩物在牙槽嵴保存中的应用:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Periodontol 2000. 2025 Feb;97(1):104-130. doi: 10.1111/prd.12609. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
Competence of allogenic demineralized tooth matrix in socket seal surgery for alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized control clinical trial.异体脱矿牙基质在牙槽嵴保存中用于 socket seal 手术的能力:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 14;28(9):484. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05879-w.
8
Clinical evaluation of different alveolar ridge preservation techniques after tooth extraction: a randomized clinical trial.拔牙后不同牙槽嵴保存技术的临床评价:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Aug;27(8):4471-4480. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05068-1. Epub 2023 May 25.
9
CBCT Evaluation of Quality and Quantity of Bones for Immediate Implant Treatment Planning in Central Incisor Area in relation to Arch Form.锥形束 CT 评估中央切牙区牙弓形态与即刻种植治疗计划相关的骨质量和骨量。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2023 Apr 17;2023:8863318. doi: 10.1155/2023/8863318. eCollection 2023.
10
Flapless Decoronation: A Minimally Invasive Approach.无瓣去冠术:一种微创方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010603.