Suppr超能文献

按致伤源分类的行人损伤:美国和欧洲案例中的严重及致残性损伤

Pedestrian Injuries By Source: Serious and Disabling Injuries in US and European Cases.

作者信息

Mallory Ann, Fredriksson Rikard, Rosén Erik, Donnelly Bruce

机构信息

Transportation Research Center Inc. Autoliv Research NHTSA.

出版信息

Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:13-24.

Abstract

US and European pedestrian crash cases were analyzed to determine frequency of injury by body region and by the vehicle component identified as the injury source. US pedestrian data was drawn from the Pedestrian Crash Data Study (PCDS). European pedestrian data was drawn from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS). Results were analyzed in terms of both serious injury (AIS 3+) and disabling injury estimated with the Functional Capacity Index (FCI). The results are presented in parallel for a more complete international perspective on injuries and injury sources. Lower extremity injury from bumper impact and head&face injury from windshield impact were the most frequent combinations for both serious and disabling injuries. Serious lower extremity injuries from bumper contact occurred in 43% of seriously injured pedestrian cases in US PCDS data and 35% of European GIDAS cases. Lower-extremity bumper injuries also account for more than 20% of disability in both datasets. Serious head &face injuries from windshield contact occur in 27% of PCDS and 15% of GIDAS serious injury cases. While bumper impacts primarily result in lower extremity injury and windshield impacts are most often associated with head & face injuries, the hood and hood leading edge are responsible for serious and disabling injuries to a number of different body regions. Therefore, while it is appropriate to focus on lower extremity injury when studying bumper performance and on head injury risk when studying windshield impact, pedestrian performance of other components may require better understanding of injury risk for multiple body regions.

摘要

对美国和欧洲的行人碰撞案例进行了分析,以确定按身体部位以及被认定为伤害来源的车辆部件划分的受伤频率。美国行人数据取自行人碰撞数据研究(PCDS)。欧洲行人数据取自德国深度事故研究(GIDAS)。根据重伤(AIS 3+)和用功能能力指数(FCI)估算的致残性伤害对结果进行了分析。为了从更全面的国际视角了解伤害情况和伤害来源,并行呈现了结果。保险杠碰撞导致的下肢伤害以及挡风玻璃碰撞导致的头部和面部伤害,是重伤和致残性伤害中最常见的组合。在美国PCDS数据中,43%的重伤行人案例以及欧洲GIDAS案例中的35%,出现了因保险杠接触导致的严重下肢伤害。在两个数据集中,下肢保险杠伤害也占残疾情况的20%以上。在PCDS的27%以及GIDAS重伤案例的15%中,出现了因挡风玻璃接触导致的严重头部和面部伤害。虽然保险杠碰撞主要导致下肢伤害,而挡风玻璃碰撞最常与头部和面部伤害相关,但发动机罩及其前缘会对多个不同身体部位造成重伤和致残性伤害。因此,虽然在研究保险杠性能时关注下肢伤害以及在研究挡风玻璃碰撞时关注头部伤害风险是合适的,但对于其他部件对行人的影响,可能需要更好地了解多个身体部位的伤害风险。

相似文献

2
The influence of passenger car front shape on pedestrian injury risk observed from German in-depth accident data.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
Analysis of Pedestrian Fractures in Collisions Between Small Cars and Pedestrians Based on Surveillance Videos.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2022 Mar 1;43(1):11-17. doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000709.
5
Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
6
An evaluation of the association between vehicle type and the source and severity of pedestrian injuries.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;6(2):185-92. doi: 10.1080/15389580590931680.
7
Detailed assessment of pedestrian ground contact injuries observed from in-depth accident data.
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jan;110:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
Vehicle front-end geometry and in-depth pedestrian injury outcomes.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(4):631-639. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2332513. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
9
Effects of vehicle bumper height and impact velocity on type of lower extremity injury in vehicle-pedestrian accidents.
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Jul;37(4):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.005. Epub 2005 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed.
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 May;41(3):536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
2
Lethal pedestrian--passenger car collisions in Berlin. Changed injury patterns in two different time intervals.
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2009 Apr;11 Suppl 1:S324-6. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
3
Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison.
Inj Prev. 2009 Feb;15(1):55-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2008.018721.
5
An evaluation of the association between vehicle type and the source and severity of pedestrian injuries.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;6(2):185-92. doi: 10.1080/15389580590931680.
6
The fatality and injury risk of light truck impacts with pedestrians in the United States.
Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Mar;36(2):295-304. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(03)00007-1.
8
Road safety in less-motorized environments: future concerns.
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;31(3):527-32. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.3.527.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验