NIHR Biomedical Research Unit in Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases at Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust and The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(2):263-74. doi: 10.1111/apt.12148. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
BACKGROUND: Rumination is the voluntary, albeit subconscious return of gastric contents to the mouth. Currently, rumination syndrome and repetitive belching disorders are considered separate diagnoses, as defined by Rome III criteria and high-resolution oesophageal manometry (HRM). AIM: To test the hypothesis that these conditions represent a common behavioural response to aversive digestive stimuli and that successful treatment can be directed at both the stimulus and the response. METHODS: Case-note review of consecutive patients with a final diagnosis of behavioural digestive disorders between August 2009 and October 2011. RESULTS: Thirty-five of 46 (76%) patients exhibited 'classical' rumination with abdomino-gastric strain (R-waves) driving gastric contents across the lower oesophageal sphincter; 5 (11%) had 'reflux-related' rumination with R-waves seen during gastro-oesophageal common cavity (reflux) events and 6 had (13%) supra-gastric belching. All received at least one biofeedback session at the time of diagnosis with a good response reported by 20/46 (43%) of the patients, which included 3 with supra-gastric belching. Additionally, rumination ceased in cases in which definitive treatment relieved the symptoms that triggered abnormal behaviour (e.g. fundoplication in 'reflux-rumination'). CONCLUSIONS: Rumination and many of its variations, excluding only some cases of supra-gastric belching, are associated with abdomino-gastric strain, a generic abnormal behavioural response to a variety of aversive digestive stimuli. All types of rumination can respond to biofeedback. High-resolution oesophageal manometry identifies subgroups with distinct mechanisms of disease that respond to specific management targeted at the symptoms that trigger the abnormal behaviour.
背景:反刍是指胃内容物自愿但潜意识地返回口腔。目前,根据罗马 III 标准和高分辨率食管测压(HRM),反刍综合征和反复呃逆障碍被认为是两种独立的诊断。
目的:检验以下假设,即这些情况代表对不良消化刺激的共同行为反应,并且成功的治疗可以针对刺激和反应。
方法:对 2009 年 8 月至 2011 年 10 月连续诊断为行为性消化障碍的患者进行病历回顾。
结果:35/46(76%)例患者表现出“经典”反刍,表现为腹部-胃张力(R 波)驱动胃内容物越过下食管括约肌;5 例(11%)为“反流相关”反刍,R 波出现在胃食管共同腔(反流)事件期间,6 例为(13%)胃上嗳气。所有患者在诊断时至少接受了一次生物反馈治疗,其中 46 例中有 20 例(43%)患者报告治疗效果良好,其中包括 3 例胃上嗳气患者。此外,在明确治疗缓解触发异常行为的症状(例如反流性反刍的胃底折叠术)的情况下,反刍停止。
结论:除了一些胃上嗳气的特殊情况外,反刍及其多种变化与腹部-胃张力有关,这是对各种不良消化刺激的一种通用的异常行为反应。所有类型的反刍都可以对生物反馈做出反应。高分辨率食管测压术可识别具有不同疾病机制的亚组,这些机制对针对触发异常行为的症状的特定管理措施有反应。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017-9-12
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011-11-9
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014-7
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011-11
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009-11-25
Dig Liver Dis. 2011-2-16
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014-10
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017-5
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013-8
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2025-3-12
United European Gastroenterol J. 2025-4
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2024-11-1
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021-12
Front Pediatr. 2021-8-19