Dunn Andrea L, Buller David B, Dearing James W, Cutter Gary, Guerra Michele, Wilcox Sara, Bettinghaus Erwin P
Klein Buendel, Inc.
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Jun;2(2):199-208. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0063-x.
There is a scarcity of research studies that have examined academic-commercial partnerships to disseminate evidence-based physical activity programs. Understanding this approach to dissemination is essential because academic-commercial partnerships are increasingly common. Private companies have used dissemination channels and strategies to a degree that academicians have not, and declining resources require academicians to explore these partnerships. PURPOSE: This paper describes a retrospective case-control study design including the methods, demographics, organizational decision-making, implementation rates, and marketing strategy for Active Living Every Day (ALED), an evidence-based lifestyle physical activity program that has been commercially available since 2001. Evidence-based public health promotion programs rely on organizations and targeted sectors to disseminate these programs although relatively little is known about organizational-level and sector-level influences that lead to their adoption and implementation. METHODS: Cases (n=154) were eligible if they had signed an ALED license agreement with Human Kinetics (HK), publisher of the program's textbooks and facilitator manuals, between 2001 and 2008. Two types of controls were matched (2:2:1) and stratified by sector and region. Active controls (Control 1; n=319) were organizations that contacted HK to consider adopting ALED. Passive controls (Control 2; n=328) were organizations that received unsolicited marketing materials and did not initiate contact with HK. We used Diffusion of Innovations Theory (DIT) constructs as the basis for developing the survey of cases and controls. RESULTS: Using the multi-method strategy recommended by Dillman, a total of n=801 cases and controls were surveyed. Most organizations were from the fitness sector followed by medical, nongovernmental, governmental, educational, worksite and other sectors with significantly higher response rates from government, educational and medical sectors compared with fitness and other sectors, (p=0.02). More cases reported being involved in the decision to adopt ALED (p<0.0001). Data indicate that a low percentage of controls had ever heard of ALED despite repeated marketing and offering other types of physical activity programs and services. Finally, slightly over half of the adopters reported they had actually implemented the ALED program. CONCLUSION: Dissemination research requires new perspectives and designs to produce valid insights about the results of dissemination efforts. This study design, survey methods and theoretically-based questions can serve as a useful model for other evidence-based public health interventions that are marketed by commercial publishers to better understand key issues related to adoption and implementation of evidence-based programs.
目前缺乏对学术 - 商业伙伴关系以传播循证体育活动项目的研究。了解这种传播方式至关重要,因为学术 - 商业伙伴关系日益普遍。私营公司在一定程度上运用了传播渠道和策略,而这是学者们未曾做到的,并且资源的减少要求学者们探索这些伙伴关系。
本文描述了一项回顾性病例对照研究设计,包括自2001年起就已商业化的循证生活方式体育活动项目“每日积极生活”(ALED)的方法、人口统计学、组织决策、实施率和营销策略。循证公共卫生促进项目依赖组织和目标部门来传播这些项目,尽管对于导致其采用和实施的组织层面和部门层面的影响了解相对较少。
病例(n = 154)若在2001年至2008年期间与该项目的教科书及指导手册出版商Human Kinetics(HK)签署了ALED许可协议,则符合条件。匹配了两种类型的对照(2:2:1),并按部门和地区进行分层。积极对照(对照1;n = 319)是那些联系HK考虑采用ALED的组织。消极对照(对照2;n = 328)是那些收到未经请求的营销材料且未主动联系HK的组织。我们以创新扩散理论(DIT)构建为基础来开发病例和对照的调查问卷。
采用Dillman推荐的多方法策略,共对n = 801例病例和对照进行了调查。大多数组织来自健身部门,其次是医疗、非政府、政府、教育、工作场所和其他部门,与健身和其他部门相比,政府、教育和医疗部门的回应率显著更高(p = 0.02)。更多病例报告参与了采用ALED的决策(p < 0.0001)。数据表明,尽管进行了反复营销并提供了其他类型的体育活动项目和服务,但仍有较低比例的对照听说过ALED。最后,略超过一半的采用者报告他们实际实施了ALED项目。
传播研究需要新的视角和设计,以便对传播努力的结果产生有效的见解。本研究设计、调查方法和基于理论的问题可为其他由商业出版商营销的循证公共卫生干预措施提供有用的模型,以更好地理解与循证项目的采用和实施相关的关键问题。