Department of Fixed Prosthodontics and Occlusion, School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1429-37.
This review of literature was conducted to evaluate the predictability of treatment outcomes with short dental implants (SDI), ie, implants shorter than 8 mm.
The review included studies, published between January 1990 and July 2011, that (1) involved SDI (<8 mm) placed in human jaws, (2) had a minimum of 20 SDI in their analysis, (3) provided data on survival rates, and (4) reported a minimum observation period of at least 3 months after placement.
Forty-one studies fulfilled the above criteria; only 17 of these studies reported outcomes with microrough surface SDI. Six different lengths (4, 5, 6, 6.5, 7 and 7.5 mm) of microrough surface SDI with varying diameters (3.5 to 6 mm) were identified in the studies. A total of 1,828 microrough surface SDI were inserted and 45 failures were reported. Observation periods ranged from 3 months to 9 years. The reported survival rates for SDI ranged from 92.2% to 100%. From a total of 1,123 SDI inserted in specified jaw locations, failures were observed more often in the maxilla (n=297, failed=13) than in the mandible (n=826, failed=19). The review did not identify any correlation between implant diameter and survival for the microrough SDI.
Microrough surface short implants (6 to 7.5 mm) appear to provide favorable survival rates and, therefore, can be predictably employed for simplification of implant therapy in situations of reduced alveolar heights in the posterior jaw segments.
本文献回顾旨在评估短种植体(SDI,长度小于 8mm)的治疗效果预测性。
该回顾性研究纳入了 1990 年 1 月至 2011 年 7 月期间发表的研究,(1)涉及人类颌骨内的 SDI(<8mm),(2)分析中至少有 20 个 SDI,(3)提供了生存率数据,(4)报告了放置后至少 3 个月的观察期。
符合上述标准的研究有 41 项,其中仅有 17 项研究报告了微粗糙表面 SDI 的结果。在这些研究中,确定了 6 种不同长度(4、5、6、6.5、7 和 7.5mm)和不同直径(3.5 至 6mm)的微粗糙表面 SDI。共植入了 1828 个微粗糙表面 SDI,报告了 45 个失败病例。观察期从 3 个月到 9 年不等。报道的 SDI 生存率从 92.2%到 100%不等。在指定的颌骨部位共植入了 1123 个 SDI,上颌(n=297,失败=13)的失败率高于下颌(n=826,失败=19)。本综述未发现微粗糙 SDI 与种植体直径和生存率之间存在任何相关性。
微粗糙表面短种植体(6 至 7.5mm)似乎提供了良好的生存率,因此可在牙槽骨高度降低的后牙区简化种植治疗方案时,可预测性地使用。