The National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, 2145 Australia.
Vaccine. 2013 Jan 11;31(4):618-25. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.052. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
The relative contribution of different categories of contact in transmitting pertussis to very young infants, who experience the most severe morbidity, is the most important single factor determining the likely benefit of pertussis vaccination of their close contacts (the "cocooning" strategy).
To identify, evaluate the quality of and summarise existing data on potential sources of infant pertussis infection in high income countries, focussing on infants under 6 months old.
Online databases MEDLINE and EMBASE. Additional studies were identified from the reference lists of relevant articles. Study selection and analysis: Study quality was evaluated by standardised criteria, based on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. Pooled estimates of the proportion of pertussis cases attributable to various contact sources were calculated using data from the highest quality studies.
Nine studies met the inclusion criteria; seven included data on contacts of hospitalised infants less than 6 months old. Case definitions and methods of contact ascertainment were variable. Most identified sources were from the household, of which 39% (95%CI 33-45%) were mothers, 16% (95%CI 12-21%) fathers, and 5% (95%CI 2-10%) grandparents. Estimates for siblings (16-43%) and non-household contacts (4-22%) were more heterogeneous. For 32-52% of infant cases, no source was identified. Asymptomatic pertussis infection was found in 8-13% of contacts evaluated.
These data suggest that the greatest potential impact of pertussis vaccination of adults to prevent severe disease in young infants comes from vaccinating mothers, followed by fathers, with grandparents having a minor role. Siblings varied in importance and, given recent data regarding waning immunity in vaccinated children, need further study. Non-household sources are also well documented, highlighting the potential limitations of the cocoon strategy to prevent severe infant disease.
在向最易患病(发病率最高)的非常年幼的婴儿传播百日咳方面,不同类别的接触者的相对贡献是决定对其密切接触者(“襁褓”策略)进行百日咳疫苗接种可能获益的最重要单一因素。
确定、评估高质量的现有数据,并总结高收入国家中可能导致婴儿感染百日咳的潜在传染源,重点关注 6 个月以下的婴儿。
在线数据库 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE。还从相关文章的参考文献中确定了其他研究。
根据观察性研究的强化报告标准(STROBE)声明,使用标准化标准评估研究质量。使用来自最高质量研究的数据计算出各种接触源归因于百日咳病例的比例的汇总估计值。
9 项研究符合纳入标准;其中 7 项研究包括了住院 6 个月以下婴儿的接触者的数据。病例定义和接触者确定方法各不相同。大多数确定的来源来自家庭,其中 39%(95%CI 33-45%)为母亲,16%(95%CI 12-21%)为父亲,5%(95%CI 2-10%)为祖父母。对于兄弟姐妹(16-43%)和非家庭接触者(4-22%)的估计值则更加多样化。32-52%的婴儿病例无法确定来源。评估的接触者中有 8-13%无症状患有百日咳。
这些数据表明,通过接种母亲、其次是父亲来预防幼儿严重疾病,从而使成年人接种百日咳疫苗,对于预防 6 个月以下婴儿的严重疾病具有最大的潜在影响。祖父母的作用较小。兄弟姐妹的重要性各不相同,而且鉴于最近关于接种疫苗儿童免疫力减弱的数据,还需要进一步研究。非家庭来源也有充分的记录,这突出了“襁褓”策略预防婴儿严重疾病的潜在局限性。