• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术:12 年单中心经验分析。

Carotid artery stenting: analysis of a 12-year single-center experience.

机构信息

Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Dec;19(6):749-56. doi: 10.1583/JEVT-12-3944MR.1.

DOI:10.1583/JEVT-12-3944MR.1
PMID:23210872
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze a 12-year experience performing carotid artery stenting (CAS) with cerebral protection.

METHODS

In accord with NASCET criteria, 672 patients underwent CAS at our hospital between November 1999 and September 2011 for de novo or postsurgical restenosis; among these, 636 patients (474 men; mean age 68 ± 6.8 years, range 63-85) had a minimum 6-month follow-up, which qualified them for this analysis. The majority of patients (381, 59.9%) were symptomatic; 47 patients had staged bilateral CAS procedures (total of 683 procedures). A cerebral protection device was used in 94.7%. Patients underwent duplex ultrasound and clinical evaluation during follow-up. Neurological adverse events were correlated with plaque morphology, patient age >80 years, learning curve, and spasm.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in all cases. Neurological events [3 (0.4%) major strokes, 8 (1.2%) minor strokes, and 11 (1.6%) transient ischemia attacks] occurred in 22 (3.2%) of the 683 cases within 30 days of the procedure (no events in follow-up). These involved 5 (2.0%) of the 255 asymptomatic patients and 17 (4.5%) of the 381 symptomatic patients (p=0.001). Neurological events proved to be higher in patients >80 years (6.4% vs. 2.7% of patients <80 years, p<0.05) and in those with complex plaque morphology (6.1% vs. 1.0% in stable plaques, p<0.001). After a mean follow-up of 76 ± 32.4 months, 478 (70%) patients were alive, with a 30-day mortality of 1.9% (none due to stroke). In-stent stenosis occurred in 9 (1.3%) stents and was resolved with angioplasty or re-stenting. The primary patency rate was 98.7%.

CONCLUSION

CAS is a valid technique for the treatment of carotid occlusive disease, with a very low rate of in-stent stenosis. Neurological complications were correlated with complex plaque morphology, which makes accurate pretreatment evaluation of the lesion mandatory if good CAS outcomes are to be achieved.

摘要

目的

分析使用脑保护装置行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的 12 年经验。

方法

根据 NASCET 标准,1999 年 11 月至 2011 年 9 月期间我院对 672 例初发或手术后再狭窄患者进行了 CAS 治疗;其中 636 例(474 例男性;平均年龄 68±6.8 岁,范围 63-85 岁)有至少 6 个月的随访,符合本分析标准。大多数患者(381 例,59.9%)为症状性;47 例患者行分期双侧 CAS 治疗(共 683 例)。94.7%使用了脑保护装置。患者在随访期间接受了超声双功检查和临床评估。神经不良事件与斑块形态、患者年龄>80 岁、学习曲线和痉挛相关。

结果

所有病例均达到技术成功。术后 30 天内 683 例中有 22 例(3.2%)发生神经事件[3 例(0.4%)大卒中和 8 例(1.2%)小卒中,11 例(1.6%)短暂性脑缺血发作](随访中无事件)。其中 5 例(2.0%)无症状患者和 17 例(4.5%)症状性患者发生神经事件(p=0.001)。>80 岁患者神经事件发生率更高(6.4% vs. <80 岁患者 2.7%,p<0.05),复杂斑块形态患者发生率更高(6.1% vs. 稳定斑块患者 1.0%,p<0.001)。平均随访 76±32.4 个月后,478 例(70%)患者存活,30 天死亡率为 1.9%(均非死于卒中)。9 例(1.3%)支架内发生狭窄,通过血管成形术或再次支架置入解决。初始通畅率为 98.7%。

结论

CAS 是治疗颈动脉闭塞性疾病的有效技术,支架内狭窄率很低。神经并发症与复杂斑块形态相关,如果要获得良好的 CAS 结果,有必要对病变进行准确的术前评估。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenting: analysis of a 12-year single-center experience.颈动脉支架置入术:12 年单中心经验分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2012 Dec;19(6):749-56. doi: 10.1583/JEVT-12-3944MR.1.
2
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
3
Early results of carotid stent placement for treatment of extracranial carotid bifurcation occlusive disease.颈动脉支架置入术治疗颅外颈动脉分叉闭塞性疾病的早期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun;39(6):1193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.038.
4
Long-term results of cephalad arteries percutanoeus transluminal angioplasty with stent implantation (The CAPTAS registry).经皮腔内血管成形术联合支架置入治疗头臂动脉狭窄的长期疗效(CAPTAS 注册研究)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Mar 1;79(4):532-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23391. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
5
Appropriateness of learning curve for carotid artery stenting: an analysis of periprocedural complications.颈动脉支架置入术学习曲线的适宜性:围手术期并发症分析
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Dec;44(6):1205-11; discussion 1211-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.027. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
6
Exclusion of atherosclerotic plaque from the circulation using stent-grafts: alternative to carotid stenting with a protection device?使用覆膜支架将动脉粥样硬化斑块排除在循环系统之外:是否可替代带有保护装置的颈动脉支架置入术?
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;30(5):854-60. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9010-0.
7
Transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal protection: experience in high-risk patients.采用血流逆转保护的经颈颈动脉支架置入术:高危患者的经验
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jul;46(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.02.070.
8
Measurement and impact of proximal and distal tortuosity in carotid stenting procedures.颈动脉支架置入术中近端和远端迂曲的测量及其影响
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.027.
9
Anatomic variables contributing to a higher periprocedural incidence of stroke and TIA in carotid artery stenting: single center experience of 833 consecutive cases.解剖学变量与颈动脉支架置入术围手术期更高的卒中/TIA 发生率有关:833 例连续病例的单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Aug 1;80(2):321-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23483. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
10
Carotid stenting using tapered and nontapered stents: associated neurological complications and restenosis rates.使用锥形和非锥形支架的颈动脉支架置入术:相关神经并发症和再狭窄率
Ann Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):439-45. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2008.11.007. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Mid-Term Results of an Italian Multicentric Experience with the Roadsaver Dual-Layer Carotid Stent System.意大利多中心使用Roadsaver双层颈动脉支架系统的中期结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;12(1):120. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12010120.
2
Long-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with carotid artery stenosis: A single-center 14-year retrospective analysis.颈动脉狭窄患者颈动脉支架置入术的长期预后:一项单中心14年回顾性分析。
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2023 Jun;25(2):160-174. doi: 10.7461/jcen.2023.E2022.07.007. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
3
Dysregulation of lncRNA SNHG1/miR-145 axis affects the biological function of human carotid artery smooth muscle cells as a mechanism of carotid artery restenosis.
lncRNA SNHG1/miR-145轴的失调影响人颈动脉平滑肌细胞的生物学功能,作为颈动脉再狭窄的一种机制。
Exp Ther Med. 2021 May;21(5):423. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9867. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
4
Long non-coding RNA cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B antisense ribonucleic acid 1 is associated with in-stent restenosis and promotes human carotid artery smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration by sponging miR-143-3p.长链非编码RNA细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂2B反义核糖核酸1与支架内再狭窄相关,并通过海绵化miR-143-3p促进人颈动脉平滑肌细胞增殖和迁移。
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Mar;21(3):234. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9665. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
Carotid endarterectomy versus stenting: Does the flow really change? An Echo-Color-Doppler analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术:血流真的会改变吗?一项超声彩色多普勒分析。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;31(4):773-81. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0623-0. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
6
Crosstalk between TGF-β/Smad3 and BMP/BMPR2 signaling pathways via miR-17-92 cluster in carotid artery restenosis.miR-17-92 簇通过 TGF-β/Smad3 和 BMP/BMPR2 信号通路在颈动脉再狭窄中的相互作用。
Mol Cell Biochem. 2014 Apr;389(1-2):169-76. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1938-6. Epub 2013 Dec 31.