Suppr超能文献

如何询问:老年人在健康结果优先排序中的偏好工具。

How to ask: older adults' preferred tools in health outcome prioritization.

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Apr;91(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.11.010. Epub 2012 Dec 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess older adults' attitudes toward eliciting health outcome priorities.

METHODS

This observational cohort study of 356 community-living adults age ≥65 included three tools: (1) Health Outcomes: ranking four outcomes (survival, function, freedom from pain, and freedom from other symptoms); (2) Now vs. Later: rating importance of current versus future quality of life; (3) Attitude Scale: agreement with statements about health outcomes and current versus future health.

RESULTS

Whereas 41% preferred Health Outcomes, 40% preferred the Attitude Scale. Only 7-12% rated any tool as very hard or hard. In bivariate analysis, participants of non-white race and with lower education, health literacy, and functional status were significantly more likely to rate at least one of the tools as easy (p < .05). Across all tools, 17% of participants believed tools would change care. The main reason for thinking there would be no change was satisfaction with existing care (62%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is variability in how older persons wish to be asked about health outcome priorities. Few find this task difficult, and difficulty was not greater among participants with lower health literacy, education, or health status.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

By offering different tools, healthcare providers can help patients clarify their health outcome priorities.

摘要

目的

评估老年人对引出健康结果优先级的态度。

方法

本研究为观察性队列研究,纳入了 356 名年龄≥65 岁的社区居住成年人,使用了三种工具:(1)健康结果:对生存、功能、无疼痛和无其他症状这四个结果进行排序;(2)现在与以后:对当前与未来生活质量的重要性进行评分;(3)态度量表:对有关健康结果和当前与未来健康的陈述表示同意。

结果

41%的人更喜欢健康结果,40%的人更喜欢态度量表。只有 7-12%的人认为任何工具都非常难或难。在单变量分析中,非白种人、受教育程度较低、健康素养和功能状态较低的参与者更有可能认为至少有一种工具容易(p<0.05)。在所有工具中,17%的参与者认为工具会改变护理。认为不会有变化的主要原因是对现有护理的满意(62%)。

结论

老年人希望被问及健康结果优先级的方式存在差异。很少有人认为这项任务有难度,而且在健康素养、教育程度或健康状况较低的参与者中,难度也没有增加。

实践意义

通过提供不同的工具,医疗保健提供者可以帮助患者明确其健康结果优先级。

相似文献

7
Older Adult Patients' Experience of Care in a Dental School Clinic.老年患者在牙科学院诊所的就医体验。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Sep;83(9):1039-1046. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.104. Epub 2019 May 27.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Public Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccine Prioritization.公众对 COVID-19 疫苗优先排序的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217943. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7943.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验