Suppr超能文献

公众对 COVID-19 疫苗优先排序的看法。

Public Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccine Prioritization.

机构信息

University of Denver Sturm College of Law, Denver, Colorado.

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217943. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7943.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

As COVID-19 vaccine distribution continues, policy makers are struggling to decide which groups should be prioritized for vaccination.

OBJECTIVE

To assess US adults' preferences regarding COVID-19 vaccine prioritization.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This survey study involved 2 independent, online surveys of US adults aged 18 years and older, 1 conducted by Gallup from September 14 to 27, 2020, and the other conducted by the COVID Collaborative from September 19 to 25, 2020. Samples were weighted to reflect sociodemographic characteristics of the US population.

EXPOSURES

Respondents were asked to prioritize groups for COVID-19 vaccine and to rank their prioritization considerations.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The study assessed prioritization preferences and agreement with the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine's Preliminary Framework for Equitable Allocation of COVID-19 Vaccine.

RESULTS

A total of 4735 individuals participated, 2730 (1474 men [54.1%]; mean [SD] age, 59.2 [14.5] years) in the Gallup survey and 2005 (944 men [47.1%]; 203 participants [21.5%] aged 55-59 years) in the COVID Collaborative survey. In both the Gallup COVID-19 Panel and COVID Collaborative surveys, respondents listed health care workers (Gallup, 93.6% [95% CI, 91.2%-95.3%]; COVID Collaborative, 80.0% [95% CI, 78.0%-81.9%]) and adults of any age with serious comorbid conditions (Gallup, 78.6% [95% CI, 75.2%-81.7%]; COVID Collaborative, 72.9% [95% CI, 70.7%-74.9%]) among their 4 highest priority groups. Respondents of all political affiliations agreed with prioritizing Black, Hispanic, Native American, and other communities that have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19 (Gallup, 74.2% [95% CI, 70.6%-77.5%]; COVID Collaborative, 84.9% [95% CI, 83.1%-86.5%]), and COVID Collaborative respondents were willing to be preceded in line by teachers and childcare workers (92.5%; 95% CI, 91.2%-93.7%) and grocery workers (85.9%; 95% CI, 84.2%-87.5%). Older respondents in both surveys were significantly less likely than younger respondents to prioritize healthy adults aged 65 years and older among their 4 highest priority groups (Gallup, 23.7% vs 39.1% [χ2 = 2160.8; P < .001]; COVID Collaborative, 23.3% vs 28.8% [χ2 = 5.0198; P = .03]). COVID Collaborative respondents believed the 4 most important considerations for prioritization were preventing COVID-19 spread (78.4% [95% CI, 76.3%-80.3%]), preventing the most deaths (72.1% [95% CI, 69.9%-74.2%]), preventing long-term complications (68.9% [66.6%-71.9%]), and protecting frontline workers (63.8% [95% CI, 61.5%-66.1%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

US adults broadly agreed with the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine's prioritization framework. Respondents endorsed prioritizing racial/ethnic communities that are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, and older respondents were significantly less likely than younger respondents to endorse prioritizing healthy people older than 65 years. This provides reason for caution about COVID-19 vaccine distribution plans that prioritize healthy adults older than a cutoff age without including those younger than that age with preexisting conditions, that aim solely to prevent the most deaths, or that give no priority to frontline workers or disproportionately affected communities.

摘要

重要性

随着 COVID-19 疫苗的持续分发,政策制定者正在努力决定哪些群体应该优先接种疫苗。

目的

评估美国成年人对 COVID-19 疫苗优先接种的偏好。

设计、地点和参与者:这项调查研究涉及两项独立的、针对美国 18 岁及以上成年人的在线调查,一项由盖洛普公司于 2020 年 9 月 14 日至 27 日进行,另一项由 COVID 合作组织于 2020 年 9 月 19 日至 25 日进行。样本经过加权处理,以反映美国人口的社会人口特征。

暴露情况

受访者被要求为 COVID-19 疫苗的接种群体进行优先级排序,并对他们的优先级考虑因素进行排名。

主要结果和措施

该研究评估了优先接种偏好,并与美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院的初步公平分配 COVID-19 疫苗框架进行了比较。

结果

共有 4735 人参与了研究,其中 2730 人(1474 名男性[54.1%];平均[SD]年龄 59.2[14.5]岁)参加了盖洛普调查,2005 人(944 名男性[47.1%];203 名参与者[21.5%]年龄在 55-59 岁)参加了 COVID 合作组织调查。在盖洛普 COVID-19 小组和 COVID 合作组织的调查中,受访者将医疗保健工作者(盖洛普,93.6%[95%CI,91.2%-95.3%];COVID 合作组织,80.0%[95%CI,78.0%-81.9%])和任何年龄患有严重合并症的成年人(盖洛普,78.6%[95%CI,75.2%-81.7%];COVID 合作组织,72.9%[95%CI,70.7%-74.9%])列为他们的前 4 个优先群体。所有政治派别的受访者都同意优先考虑受 COVID-19 影响不成比例的黑人群体、西班牙裔群体、美国原住民群体和其他社区(盖洛普,74.2%[95%CI,70.6%-77.5%];COVID 合作组织,84.9%[95%CI,83.1%-86.5%]),并且 COVID 合作组织的受访者愿意让教师和儿童保育工作者(92.5%;95%CI,91.2%-93.7%)和杂货店工作人员(85.9%;95%CI,84.2%-87.5%)排在他们前面。两项调查中的年长受访者比年轻受访者更不可能将 65 岁及以上的健康成年人列为他们的前 4 个优先群体(盖洛普,23.7%比 39.1%[χ2=2160.8;P<0.001];COVID 合作组织,23.3%比 28.8%[χ2=5.0198;P=0.03])。COVID 合作组织的受访者认为,优先接种疫苗的 4 个最重要的考虑因素是预防 COVID-19 传播(78.4%[95%CI,76.3%-80.3%])、预防最多死亡(72.1%[95%CI,69.9%-74.2%])、预防长期并发症(68.9%[66.6%-71.9%])和保护一线工作人员(63.8%[95%CI,61.5%-66.1%])。

结论和相关性

美国成年人广泛同意美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院的优先接种框架。受访者支持优先考虑受 COVID-19 影响不成比例的种族/族裔社区,年长的受访者比年轻的受访者更不可能支持优先考虑 65 岁以上的健康人群。这为 COVID-19 疫苗接种计划提供了理由,这些计划优先考虑健康的成年人,而不包括年龄在该年龄以下但有合并症的人,这些计划旨在预防最多的死亡,或者不给一线工作人员或受影响不成比例的社区优先考虑。

相似文献

1
Public Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccine Prioritization.公众对 COVID-19 疫苗优先排序的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217943. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7943.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验