• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《良性税收:1991 年联邦酒精税提高的救生和预防犯罪效应》。

The virtuous tax: lifesaving and crime-prevention effects of the 1991 federal alcohol-tax increase.

机构信息

Public Policy and Economics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0245, USA.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.11.003
PMID:23220460
Abstract

The last time that federal excise taxes on alcoholic beverages were increased was 1991. The changes were larger than the typical state-level changes that have been used to study price effects, but the consequences have not been assessed due to the lack of a control group. Here we develop and implement a novel method for utilizing interstate heterogeneity to estimate the aggregate effects of a federal tax increase on rates of injury fatality and crime. We provide evidence that the relative importance of alcohol in violence and injury rates is directly related to per capita consumption, and build on that finding to generate estimates. A conservative estimate is that the federal tax (which increased alcohol prices by 6% initially) reduced injury deaths by 4.5% (6480 deaths), in 1991, and had a still larger effect on violent crime.

摘要

最后一次提高联邦酒精饮料消费税是在 1991 年。这些变化比典型的州一级的变化要大,这些变化被用来研究价格效应,但由于缺乏对照组,因此没有评估其后果。在这里,我们开发并实施了一种新的方法,利用州际差异来估计联邦税收增加对伤害死亡率和犯罪率的总体影响。我们提供的证据表明,酒精在暴力和伤害率中的相对重要性与人均消费量直接相关,并在此基础上进行了估算。一个保守的估计是,联邦税收(最初使酒精价格上涨了 6%)使 1991 年的伤害死亡人数减少了 4.5%(6480 人死亡),对暴力犯罪的影响更大。

相似文献

1
The virtuous tax: lifesaving and crime-prevention effects of the 1991 federal alcohol-tax increase.《良性税收:1991 年联邦酒精税提高的救生和预防犯罪效应》。
J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
2
The effect of alcoholic beverage excise tax on alcohol-attributable injury mortalities.酒精饮料消费税对与酒精相关的伤害死亡率的影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Apr;12(2):103-13. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0231-9. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
3
Effects of prices, civil and criminal sanctions, and law enforcement on alcohol-related mortality.价格、民事和刑事制裁以及执法对与酒精相关死亡率的影响。
J Stud Alcohol. 1994 Jul;55(4):454-65. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1994.55.454.
4
Cost-effectiveness of raising alcohol excise taxes to reduce the injury burden of road traffic crashes.提高酒精消费税以减少道路交通碰撞伤害负担的成本效益。
Inj Prev. 2019 Oct;25(5):421-427. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2018-042914. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Estimates of harm associated with changes in Swedish alcohol policy: results from past and present estimates.瑞典酒精政策变化相关危害的评估:过去与当前评估结果
Addiction. 2006 Aug;101(8):1096-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01485.x.
6
Effects of alcohol tax and price policies on morbidity and mortality: a systematic review.酒精税和价格政策对发病率和死亡率的影响:系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2270-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.186007. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
7
Assessing the impact of alcohol taxation on rates of violent victimization in a large urban area: an agent-based modeling approach.评估酒类税收对一个大城市暴力受害率的影响:基于主体的建模方法。
Addiction. 2019 Feb;114(2):236-247. doi: 10.1111/add.14470. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Alcohol and injury prevention.酒精与伤害预防。
J Trauma. 2006 Feb;60(2):447-51. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196956.49282.91.
9
Effective prevention against risky underage drinking--the need for higher excise taxes on alcoholic beverages in Germany.有效预防危险的未成年人饮酒——德国需要提高酒精饮料的消费税。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2010 Jul-Aug;45(4):387-94. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agq031. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
10
The pass-through of alcohol excise taxes to prices in OECD countries.经合组织国家酒类消费税向价格的传递。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Aug;21(6):855-867. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01177-w. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing the commercial determinants of mental health: an umbrella review of population-level interventions.解决心理健康的商业决定因素:人群水平干预措施的伞式综述。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae147.
2
An Integrated Public Health Approach to Interpersonal Violence and Suicide Prevention and Response.一种预防和应对人际暴力及自杀的综合公共卫生方法。
Public Health Rep. 2018 Nov/Dec;133(1_suppl):65S-79S. doi: 10.1177/0033354918800019.
3
Deterring Rearrests for Drinking and Driving.威慑酒后驾车再次被捕行为。
South Econ J. 2016 Oct;83(2):416-436. doi: 10.1002/soej.12159. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
4
Does the probability of DWI arrest fall following participation in DWI and hybrid drug treatment court programs?参与酒驾及混合药物治疗法庭项目后,酒驾被捕的概率会下降吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Dec;97:197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.029. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
5
Alcohol Policies and Suicide: A Review of the Literature.酒精政策与自杀:文献综述
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Oct;40(10):2043-2055. doi: 10.1111/acer.13203. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
6
The Effect of a Sunday Liquor-Sales Ban Repeal on Crime: A Triple-Difference Analysis.周日酒类销售禁令废除对犯罪的影响:三重差分分析
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 May;40(5):1111-21. doi: 10.1111/acer.13047. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
7
What happens to drinking when alcohol policy changes? A review of five natural experiments for alcohol taxes, prices, and availability.当酒精政策改变时,饮酒情况会发生什么变化?对五项关于酒精税、价格和可得性的自然实验的综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 May;18(4):417-434. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0795-0. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
8
A Review of Existing Studies Reporting the Negative Effects of Alcohol Access and Positive Effects of Alcohol Control Policies on Interpersonal Violence.关于现有研究报告的综述,这些研究报告表明酒精获取的负面影响和酒精控制政策对人际暴力的积极影响。
Front Public Health. 2015 Nov 16;3:253. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00253. eCollection 2015.
9
A Review of the Statistical and Quantitative Methods Used to Study Alcohol-Attributable Crime.用于研究酒精所致犯罪的统计和定量方法综述。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 29;10(9):e0139344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139344. eCollection 2015.