Suppr超能文献

听觉词语学习测试的短期延迟回忆与长期延迟回忆在识别遗忘型轻度认知障碍方面等效。

Short-term delayed recall of auditory verbal learning test is equivalent to long-term delayed recall for identifying amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051157. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

Abstract

Delayed recall of words in a verbal learning test is a sensitive measure for the diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and early Alzheimer's disease (AD). The relative validity of different retention intervals of delayed recall has not been well characterized. Using the Auditory Verbal Learning Test-Huashan version, we compared the differentiating value of short-term delayed recall (AVL-SR, that is, a 3- to 5-minute delay time) and long-term delayed recall (AVL-LR, that is, a 20-minute delay time) in distinguishing patients with aMCI (n = 897) and mild AD (n = 530) from the healthy elderly (n = 1215). In patients with aMCI, the correlation between AVL-SR and AVL-LR was very high (r = 0.94), and the difference between the two indicators was less than 0.5 points. There was no difference between AVL-SR and AVL-LR in the frequency of zero scores. In the receiver operating characteristic curves analysis, although the area under the curve (AUC) of AVL-SR and AVL-LR for diagnosing aMCI was significantly different, the cut-off scores of the two indicators were identical. In the subgroup of ages 80 to 89, the AUC of the two indicators showed no significant difference. Therefore, we concluded that AVL-SR could substitute for AVL-LR in identifying aMCI, especially for the oldest patients.

摘要

在词语学习测试中,回忆词的延迟时间是诊断遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)和早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)的敏感指标。不同延迟回忆时间间隔的相对有效性尚未得到很好的描述。使用听觉词语学习测试-华山版,我们比较了短期延迟回忆(AVL-SR,即 3 至 5 分钟的延迟时间)和长期延迟回忆(AVL-LR,即 20 分钟的延迟时间)在区分 aMCI 患者(n = 897)和轻度 AD 患者(n = 530)与健康老年人(n = 1215)方面的区分价值。在 aMCI 患者中,AVL-SR 与 AVL-LR 之间的相关性非常高(r = 0.94),并且两个指标之间的差异小于 0.5 分。两种指标的零分频率没有差异。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,虽然 AVL-SR 和 AVL-LR 用于诊断 aMCI 的曲线下面积(AUC)有显著差异,但两个指标的截断值相同。在 80 至 89 岁的亚组中,两个指标的 AUC 没有显著差异。因此,我们得出结论,AVL-SR 可以替代 AVL-LR 来识别 aMCI,尤其是对于最年长的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfdb/3517417/76ef48dec495/pone.0051157.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验