Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun;16(6):1073-81. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012005290. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
The present study aimed to determine whether a multi-component school-based intervention can maintain children's fruit and vegetable intake post eligibility for free school fruit and vegetables.
A random sample of fifty-four English primary schools was randomised to receive the 10-month intervention Project Tomato, a multi-component theory-based intervention, or the control. Each group consisted of twenty-seven schools.
Children's intake of fruit and vegetables is below recommendations. The English School Fruit and Vegetable Scheme has a short-term impact on intake while children are eligible for the scheme.
Dietary measurements were collected from 658 Year 2 pupils aged 7-8 years at baseline and at follow-up 20 months later.
Following an intention to treat analysis, the intervention as delivered compared with the control had no impact on the intake of fruit and vegetables (2 g/d, 95 % CI -23, 26 g/d) or on the number of portions of fruit (0.0 portions, 95 % CI - 0.3, 0.3) or vegetables (0.0 portions, 95 % CI - 0.2, 0.3) consumed daily by children. Intake of fruit and vegetables at school and home dropped by ≈ 100 g/d and 50 g/d, respectively, between baseline and follow-up in both the intervention and control groups.
Implementation of the intervention was low, with associated lack of impact on fruit and vegetable consumption in children. Alternatives to the delivery of an intervention by teachers and parents are needed to improve the dietary intake of primary-school children.
本研究旨在确定多组分学校干预是否可以维持儿童在符合免费学校水果和蔬菜条件后的水果和蔬菜摄入量。
随机抽取了 54 所英国小学进行随机分组,接受为期 10 个月的干预项目“番茄计划”(一种基于理论的多组分干预)或对照组。每个组由 27 所学校组成。
儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量低于建议量。英国学校水果和蔬菜计划对符合计划条件的儿童的摄入量有短期影响。
在基线和 20 个月后的随访中,从 658 名 7-8 岁的二年级学生中收集了饮食测量数据。
采用意向治疗分析,与对照组相比,干预组对水果和蔬菜的摄入量(2 克/天,95%置信区间为-23,26 克/天)或水果的份数(0.0 份,95%置信区间为-0.3,0.3)或蔬菜(0.0 份,95%置信区间为-0.2,0.3)没有影响。在干预组和对照组中,基线和随访之间,儿童在学校和家中的水果和蔬菜摄入量分别下降了约 100 克/天和 50 克/天。
干预措施的实施率较低,对儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量没有影响。需要寻找替代教师和家长提供干预措施的方法,以改善小学生的饮食摄入。