• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A cluster-randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: Project Tomato.以学校为基础的水果和蔬菜干预措施的整群随机对照试验:番茄计划。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun;16(6):1073-81. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012005290. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
2
Process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: Project Tomato.基于学校的水果和蔬菜干预措施的整群随机对照试验的过程评估:番茄计划。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Mar;15(3):459-65. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011001844. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
3
Evaluation of the impact of a school gardening intervention on children's fruit and vegetable intake: a randomised controlled trial.学校园艺干预对儿童水果和蔬菜摄入量影响的评估:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Aug 16;11:99. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0099-7.
4
Study protocol: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school based fruit and vegetable intervention - Project Tomato.研究方案:一项基于学校的水果和蔬菜干预措施——“番茄项目”的整群随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 16;9:101. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-101.
5
6
Increasing children's lunchtime consumption of fruit and vegetables: an evaluation of the Food Dudes programme.增加儿童午餐时水果和蔬菜的摄入量:对“美食小子”项目的评估。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun;16(6):1066-72. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004612. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
7
Impact evaluation of the Northern Fruit and Vegetable Pilot Programme - a cluster-randomised controlled trial.北方果蔬试点项目的影响评估——一项整群随机对照试验。
Public Health Nutr. 2009 Nov;12(11):2199-208. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009005801. Epub 2009 May 28.
8
Positive impact of a pre-school-based nutritional intervention on children's fruit and vegetable intake: results of a cluster-randomized trial.幼儿园营养干预对儿童蔬果摄入的积极影响:一项整群随机试验的结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Mar;15(3):466-75. doi: 10.1017/S136898001100200X. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
9
Engagement with the National Healthy Schools Programme is associated with higher fruit and vegetable consumption in primary school children.参与国家健康学校计划与小学生增加水果和蔬菜的消费有关。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012 Apr;25(2):155-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2011.01208.x. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
10
Evaluation of the impact of school gardening interventions on children's knowledge of and attitudes towards fruit and vegetables. A cluster randomised controlled trial.评估学校园艺干预措施对儿童关于水果和蔬菜的知识及态度的影响。一项整群随机对照试验。
Appetite. 2015 Aug;91:405-14. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.076. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the school-based 'PhunkyFoods' intervention: a cluster randomised controlled trial in the UK.基于学校的“趣味食品”干预措施评估:英国一项整群随机对照试验
Public Health Nutr. 2025 Apr 14;28(1):e86. doi: 10.1017/S1368980025000552.
2
Identifying barriers and facilitators to increase fibre intakes in UK primary school children and exploring the acceptability of intervention components: a UK qualitative study.识别英国小学生增加膳食纤维摄入量的障碍和促进因素,并探讨干预措施的可接受性:一项英国定性研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;27(1):e59. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000089.
3
Effectiveness of Health Promotion Interventions in Primary Schools-A Mixed Methods Literature Review.小学健康促进干预措施的有效性——一项混合方法文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;11(13):1817. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131817.
4
Effectiveness of a School-Based Culinary Programme on 9- and 10-Year-Old Children's Food Literacy and Vegetable, Fruit, and Breakfast Consumption.基于学校的烹饪课程对 9-10 岁儿童食物素养和蔬菜、水果及早餐食用情况的影响。
Nutrients. 2023 Mar 21;15(6):1520. doi: 10.3390/nu15061520.
5
Effects of nutritional intervention strategies in the primary prevention of overweight and obesity in school settings: systematic review and network meta-analysis.学校环境中营养干预策略在超重和肥胖一级预防中的作用:系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Med. 2022 Dec 23;1(1):e000346. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000346. eCollection 2022.
6
The effects of school gardens on fruit and vegetable consumption at school: A randomized controlled trial with low-income elementary schools in four U.S. states.学校花园对在校水果和蔬菜消费的影响:一项针对美国四个州低收入小学的随机对照试验。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Nov 14;31:102053. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.102053. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Evaluation of Social Impact Within Primary School Health Promotion: A Systematic Review.评价小学健康促进中的社会影响:系统评价。
J Sch Health. 2022 Aug;92(8):739-764. doi: 10.1111/josh.13160. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
8
Research Design, Protocol, and Participant Characteristics of COLEAFS: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Childcare Garden Intervention.COLEAFS 研究设计、方案和参与者特征:一项幼儿花园干预的集群随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;18(24):13066. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413066.
9
Characteristics and practices of school-based cluster randomised controlled trials for improving health outcomes in pupils in the United Kingdom: a methodological systematic review.英国以学校为基础的整群随机对照试验改善学生健康结局的特征与实践:一项方法学系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jul 26;21(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01348-0.
10
Characteristics of successful primary school-based experiential nutrition programmes: a systematic literature review.成功的小学体验式营养计划的特点:系统文献回顾。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct;24(14):4642-4662. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004024. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: Project Tomato.基于学校的水果和蔬菜干预措施的整群随机对照试验的过程评估:番茄计划。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Mar;15(3):459-65. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011001844. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
2
SMART lunch box intervention to improve the food and nutrient content of children's packed lunches: UK wide cluster randomised controlled trial.智能午餐盒干预措施以改善儿童携带午餐的食物和营养成分:英国范围内的群组随机对照试验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Nov;64(11):970-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.085837. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
3
A comparison of British school meals and packed lunches from 1990 to 2007: meta-analysis by lunch type.1990 年至 2007 年英国学校餐与盒装午餐的比较:按午餐类型进行的荟萃分析。
Br J Nutr. 2010 Aug;104(4):474-87. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510001601. Epub 2010 May 26.
4
Effects of a school-based intervention on adherence of 7-9-year-olds to food-based dietary guidelines and intake of nutrients.基于学校的干预对 7-9 岁儿童遵守食物为基础的饮食指南和营养素摄入的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Aug;13(8):1151-61. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000716. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
5
A cross-sectional survey of children's packed lunches in the UK: food- and nutrient-based results.英国儿童携带午餐的横断面调查:基于食物和营养素的结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Nov;64(11):977-83. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.085977. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
6
Study protocol: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school based fruit and vegetable intervention - Project Tomato.研究方案:一项基于学校的水果和蔬菜干预措施——“番茄项目”的整群随机对照试验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun 16;9:101. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-101.
7
Effects of a comprehensive fruit- and vegetable-promoting school-based intervention in three European countries: the Pro Children Study.一项在三个欧洲国家开展的以促进水果和蔬菜摄入为主题的综合性校内干预措施的效果:儿童促进研究
Br J Nutr. 2008 Apr;99(4):893-903. doi: 10.1017/S000711450782513X. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
8
APPLE Project: 2-y findings of a community-based obesity prevention program in primary school age children.苹果项目:一项针对小学适龄儿童的社区肥胖预防计划的两年研究结果
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Sep;86(3):735-42. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.3.735.
9
Does the school fruit and vegetable scheme improve children's diet? A non-randomised controlled trial.学校果蔬计划能否改善儿童饮食?一项非随机对照试验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Aug;61(8):699-703. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.052696.
10
School-based nutrition programs produced a moderate increase in fruit and vegetable consumption: meta and pooling analyses from 7 studies.基于学校的营养计划使水果和蔬菜的消费量适度增加:来自7项研究的荟萃分析和汇总分析。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007 Jul-Aug;39(4):186-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2007.01.010.

以学校为基础的水果和蔬菜干预措施的整群随机对照试验:番茄计划。

A cluster-randomised controlled trial of a school-based fruit and vegetable intervention: Project Tomato.

机构信息

Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun;16(6):1073-81. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012005290. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980012005290
PMID:23237386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10271632/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to determine whether a multi-component school-based intervention can maintain children's fruit and vegetable intake post eligibility for free school fruit and vegetables.

DESIGN

A random sample of fifty-four English primary schools was randomised to receive the 10-month intervention Project Tomato, a multi-component theory-based intervention, or the control. Each group consisted of twenty-seven schools.

SETTING

Children's intake of fruit and vegetables is below recommendations. The English School Fruit and Vegetable Scheme has a short-term impact on intake while children are eligible for the scheme.

SUBJECTS

Dietary measurements were collected from 658 Year 2 pupils aged 7-8 years at baseline and at follow-up 20 months later.

RESULTS

Following an intention to treat analysis, the intervention as delivered compared with the control had no impact on the intake of fruit and vegetables (2 g/d, 95 % CI -23, 26 g/d) or on the number of portions of fruit (0.0 portions, 95 % CI - 0.3, 0.3) or vegetables (0.0 portions, 95 % CI - 0.2, 0.3) consumed daily by children. Intake of fruit and vegetables at school and home dropped by ≈ 100 g/d and 50 g/d, respectively, between baseline and follow-up in both the intervention and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the intervention was low, with associated lack of impact on fruit and vegetable consumption in children. Alternatives to the delivery of an intervention by teachers and parents are needed to improve the dietary intake of primary-school children.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定多组分学校干预是否可以维持儿童在符合免费学校水果和蔬菜条件后的水果和蔬菜摄入量。

设计

随机抽取了 54 所英国小学进行随机分组,接受为期 10 个月的干预项目“番茄计划”(一种基于理论的多组分干预)或对照组。每个组由 27 所学校组成。

背景

儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量低于建议量。英国学校水果和蔬菜计划对符合计划条件的儿童的摄入量有短期影响。

研究对象

在基线和 20 个月后的随访中,从 658 名 7-8 岁的二年级学生中收集了饮食测量数据。

结果

采用意向治疗分析,与对照组相比,干预组对水果和蔬菜的摄入量(2 克/天,95%置信区间为-23,26 克/天)或水果的份数(0.0 份,95%置信区间为-0.3,0.3)或蔬菜(0.0 份,95%置信区间为-0.2,0.3)没有影响。在干预组和对照组中,基线和随访之间,儿童在学校和家中的水果和蔬菜摄入量分别下降了约 100 克/天和 50 克/天。

结论

干预措施的实施率较低,对儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量没有影响。需要寻找替代教师和家长提供干预措施的方法,以改善小学生的饮食摄入。