Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2012;8:585-98. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S32301. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) can significantly affect an individual's quality of life, the health care system, and even society. The first decade of the new millennium has seen renewed interest in this condition, but etiological understanding and evidence-based treatment availability remain limited. After the diagnosis of PNES is established, the first therapeutic step includes a presentation of the diagnosis that facilitates engagement in treatment. The purpose of this review is to present the current evidence of treatments for PNES published since the year 2000 and to discuss further needs for clinical treatment implementation and research. This article reviews clinical trials that have evaluated the efficacy of structured, standardized psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions. The primary outcome measure in clinical trials for PNES is event frequency, although it is questionable whether this is the most accurate indicator of functional recovery. Cognitive behavioral therapy has evidence of efficacy, including one pilot randomized, controlled trial where cognitive behavioral therapy was compared with standard medical care. The antidepressant sertraline did not show a significant difference in event frequency change when compared to placebo in a pilot randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, but it did show a significant pre- versus posttreatment decrease in the active arm. Other interventions that have shown efficacy in uncontrolled trials include augmented psychodynamic interpersonal psychotherapy, group psychodynamic psychotherapy, group psychoeducation, and the antidepressant venlafaxine. Larger clinical trials of these promising treatments are necessary, while other psychotherapeutic interventions such as hypnotherapy, mindfulness-based therapies, and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing may deserve exploration. Flexible delivery of treatment that considers the heterogeneous backgrounds of patients is emphasized as necessary for successful outcomes in clinical practice.
心因性非癫痫性发作 (PNES) 可显著影响个体的生活质量、医疗保健系统,甚至整个社会。在新千年的第一个十年里,人们对这种疾病重新产生了兴趣,但病因学的理解和基于证据的治疗方法仍然有限。PNES 的诊断确立后,第一个治疗步骤包括对该疾病进行诊断,以促进患者接受治疗。本文旨在介绍自 2000 年以来发表的关于 PNES 治疗的最新循证研究,并进一步讨论临床治疗实施和研究的需求。本文回顾了评估结构化、标准化心理治疗和精神药理学干预措施疗效的临床试验。PNES 临床试验的主要结局指标是发作频率,但发作频率是否是功能恢复的最准确指标仍存在争议。认知行为疗法具有疗效证据,包括一项将认知行为疗法与标准医疗护理进行比较的试点随机对照试验。在一项试点随机双盲对照试验中,与安慰剂相比,抗抑郁药舍曲林在发作频率的变化方面并未显示出显著差异,但在治疗组中,其治疗前后确实显示出显著的下降。在非对照试验中显示疗效的其他干预措施包括增强型人际心理动力学治疗、团体心理动力学治疗、团体心理教育和抗抑郁药文拉法辛。这些有前途的治疗方法需要进行更大规模的临床试验,而其他心理治疗干预措施,如催眠疗法、正念疗法和眼动脱敏再处理疗法,也可能值得探索。考虑到患者背景的异质性,强调灵活地提供治疗是临床实践中取得成功的必要条件。