Department of Neurological Sciences, Hospital-Clínica Kennedy, Guayaquil, Ecuador.
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Sep;106(5):299-304. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000025.
Diagnosis of neurocysticercosis (NCC) can be a challenge. Clinical manifestations are non-specific, most neuroimaging findings are non-pathognomonic, and some serologic tests have low sensitivity or specificity. A set of diagnostic criteria was proposed in 2001 to avoid the over diagnosis of NCC that occurs in epidemiologic surveys, and to help clinicians evaluating patients with suspected NCC. The set included four stratified categories of criteria, including: (1) absolute: histological demonstration of cysticerci, cystic lesions showing the scolex on neuroimaging studies, and direct visualization of subretinal parasites by fundoscopic examination; (2) major: lesions highly suggestive of NCC on neuroimaging studies, positive serum enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot (EITB) for the detection of anticysticercal antibodies, resolution of intracranial cystic lesions after cysticidal drug therapy, and spontaneous resolution of single enhancing lesions; (3) minor: lesions compatible with NCC on neuroimaging studies, suggestive clinical manifestations, positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ELISA for detection of anticysticercal antibodies or cysticercal antigens, and cysticercosis outside the nervous system; and (4) epidemiological: evidence of a household contact with Taenia solium infection, individuals coming from or living in cysticercosis endemic areas, and history of travel to disease-endemic areas. Interpretation of these criteria permits two degrees of diagnostic certainty: (1) definitive diagnosis, in patients who have one absolute criterion or in those who have two major plus one minor and one epidemiological criteria; and (2) probable diagnosis, in patients who have one major plus two minor criteria, in those who have one major plus one minor and one epidemiological criteria, and in those who have three minor plus one epidemiological criteria. After 10 years of usage, this set has been proved useful in both, field studies, and hospital settings. Recent advances in neuroimaging and immune diagnostic methods have enhanced its accuracy for the diagnosis of NCC.
神经囊尾蚴病(NCC)的诊断具有一定挑战性。临床表现无特异性,大多数神经影像学发现无特征性,部分血清学检测的敏感性或特异性较低。2001 年提出了一套诊断标准,旨在避免在流行病学调查中出现的 NCC 过度诊断,并帮助临床医生评估疑似 NCC 患者。该标准包括 4 个分层类别标准,包括:(1)绝对标准:囊尾蚴组织学证据、神经影像学研究显示囊状病变有头节、眼底镜检查可直接观察到视网膜下寄生虫;(2)主要标准:神经影像学检查高度提示 NCC、血清酶联免疫电转移印迹(EITB)检测抗囊尾蚴抗体阳性、囊虫药物治疗后颅内囊状病变消退、单发强化病变自发消退;(3)次要标准:神经影像学检查提示 NCC 病变、临床表现提示、脑脊液(CSF)ELISA 检测抗囊尾蚴抗体或囊尾蚴抗原阳性、神经系统外囊尾蚴病;(4)流行病学标准:与带绦虫感染者有家庭接触、来自或生活在囊尾蚴病流行地区、有疾病流行地区旅行史。这些标准的解读允许有两种诊断确定性程度:(1)明确诊断,患者具有 1 项绝对标准或 2 项主要标准加 1 项次要标准和 1 项流行病学标准;(2)可能诊断,患者具有 1 项主要标准加 2 项次要标准、1 项主要标准加 1 项次要标准和 1 项流行病学标准、或 3 项次要标准加 1 项流行病学标准。该标准使用 10 年后,在现场研究和医院环境中均被证明是有用的。神经影像学和免疫诊断方法的最新进展提高了其诊断 NCC 的准确性。