Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Biomol NMR. 2013 Feb;55(2):167-78. doi: 10.1007/s10858-012-9698-2. Epub 2012 Dec 29.
It is well established that non-uniform sampling (NUS) allows acquisition of multi-dimensional NMR spectra at a resolution that cannot be obtained with traditional uniform acquisition through the indirect dimensions. However, the impact of NUS on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and sensitivity are less well documented. SNR and sensitivity are essential aspects of NMR experiments as they define the quality and extent of data that can be obtained. This is particularly important for spectroscopy with low concentration samples of biological macromolecules. There are different ways of defining the SNR depending on how to measure the noise, and the distinction between SNR and sensitivity is often not clear. While there are defined procedures for measuring sensitivity with high concentration NMR standards, such as sucrose, there is no clear or generally accepted definition of sensitivity when comparing different acquisition and processing methods for spectra of biological macromolecules with many weak signals close to the level of noise. Here we propose tools for estimating the SNR and sensitivity of NUS spectra with respect to sampling schedule and reconstruction method. We compare uniformly acquired spectra with NUS spectra obtained in the same total measuring time. The time saving obtained when only 1/k of the Nyquist grid points are sampled is used to measure k-fold more scans per increment. We show that judiciously chosen NUS schedules together with suitable reconstruction methods can yield a significant increase of the SNR within the same total measurement time. Furthermore, we propose to define the sensitivity as the probability to detect weak peaks and show that time-equivalent NUS can considerably increase this detection sensitivity. The sensitivity gain increases with the number of NUS indirect dimensions. Thus, well-chosen NUS schedules and reconstruction methods can significantly increase the information content of multidimensional NMR spectra of challenging biological macromolecules.
已经证实,非均匀采样(NUS)允许在分辨率方面获取多维 NMR 光谱,而传统的均匀采集通过间接维度无法获得该分辨率。然而,NUS 对信噪比(SNR)和灵敏度的影响记录较少。SNR 和灵敏度是 NMR 实验的重要方面,因为它们定义了可以获得的数据的质量和范围。对于低浓度生物大分子样品的光谱学来说,这一点尤为重要。根据如何测量噪声,有不同的方法来定义 SNR,而 SNR 和灵敏度之间的区别并不总是很清楚。虽然对于高浓度 NMR 标准(如蔗糖),有测量灵敏度的定义程序,但在比较用于具有许多接近噪声水平的弱信号的生物大分子光谱的不同采集和处理方法时,没有明确或普遍接受的灵敏度定义。在这里,我们提出了用于估计与采样方案和重建方法有关的 NUS 光谱的 SNR 和灵敏度的工具。我们将在相同的总测量时间内比较均匀采集的光谱和 NUS 光谱。仅对奈奎斯特网格点的 1/k 进行采样时获得的时间节省用于每个增量测量 k 倍的更多扫描。我们表明,明智选择的 NUS 时间表与合适的重建方法相结合,可以在相同的总测量时间内显著提高 SNR。此外,我们建议将灵敏度定义为检测弱峰的概率,并表明时间等效的 NUS 可以大大提高这种检测灵敏度。灵敏度增益随 NUS 间接维度的数量增加而增加。因此,精心选择的 NUS 时间表和重建方法可以显著增加具有挑战性的生物大分子的多维 NMR 光谱的信息量。