University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1200-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1866. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
To compare associations between neighborhood deprivation and measures of BMI change among adults with type 2 diabetes.
Using data from the Kaiser Permanente Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE) survey, we estimated the association between neighborhood deprivation and two measures of BMI change over 3 years: 1) a continuous measure and 2) a categorical measure of clinically substantive BMI loss or gain (≥7% of baseline BMI) versus stable BMI. The sample included 13,609 adults.
On average, there was little change in BMI (-0.12, SD 3.07); 17.0 and 16.1% had clinically substantive BMI loss or gain, respectively, at follow-up. There was a positive association between neighborhood deprivation and BMI change for adults in the most versus least-deprived quartile of neighborhood deprivation (β = 0.22, P = 0.02) in adjusted models. In addition, relative to the least-deprived quartile (Q1), adults in more-deprived quartiles of neighborhood deprivation were more likely to experience either substantive BMI loss (Q2 relative risk ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.00-1.41; Q3 1.20, 1.02-1.42; Q4 1.30, 1.08-1.55) or gain (Q2 1.25, 1.04-1.49; Q3 1.24, 1.04-1.49; Q4 1.45, 1.20-1.75).
Greater neighborhood deprivation was positively associated with BMI change among adults with diabetes as well as with clinically substantive BMI loss or gain. Findings stress the importance of allowing for simultaneous associations with both gain and loss in future longitudinal studies of neighborhood deprivation and weight change, which may be particularly true for studies of patients with diabetes for whom both weight loss and gain have health implications.
比较 2 型糖尿病成年人的邻里贫困与 BMI 变化指标之间的关联。
利用加利福尼亚州凯撒永久糖尿病研究(DISTANCE)调查的数据,我们估计了邻里贫困与 BMI 变化的两项指标之间的关联:1)连续指标和 2)BMI 临床显著下降或上升(≥基线 BMI 的 7%)与稳定 BMI 的分类指标。该样本包括 13609 名成年人。
平均而言,BMI 变化不大(-0.12,SD 3.07);随访时分别有 17.0%和 16.1%的成年人出现 BMI 临床显著下降或上升。在调整后的模型中,处于邻里贫困最严重与最不严重四分之一的成年人之间,邻里贫困与 BMI 变化呈正相关(β=0.22,P=0.02)。此外,与最不贫困的四分之一(Q1)相比,处于更贫困的邻里贫困四分之一的成年人更有可能经历 BMI 实质性下降(Q2 相对风险比 1.19,95%CI 1.00-1.41;Q3 1.20,1.02-1.42;Q4 1.30,1.08-1.55)或上升(Q2 1.25,1.04-1.49;Q3 1.24,1.04-1.49;Q4 1.45,1.20-1.75)。
更大的邻里贫困与糖尿病成年人的 BMI 变化以及 BMI 临床显著下降或上升呈正相关。研究结果强调了在未来的邻里贫困与体重变化的纵向研究中,同时考虑到增益和损失关联的重要性,对于患有糖尿病的患者,体重下降和增加都对健康有影响,这种情况可能更为真实。