Rouesse J, Friedman S, Guash-Jordan I, Hacene K, Brunet M
Centre Rene-Huguenin, St. Cloud, France.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1990 Jan;15(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/BF01811885.
A multivariate analysis was performed to assess the effect of post-relapse systemic therapy on a series of patients with metastatic breast cancer who at initial presentation had no detectable metastases (Mo), were less than or equal to 70 years of age, presented with unilateral localized disease and no other associated malignancy, and were treated between 1965 and 1984 with successive protocols for primary disease and subsequently developed distant metastasis. All 760 patients analyzed relapsed with at least one metastasis, and were studied retrospectively with no selection criteria according to any specific protocol. All had recorded clinical data on menopause, stage, clinical tumor aggressiveness (PEV), initial chemo or hormonal therapy, and time to relapse, and had ongoing follow up at our Center, with salvage chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy having been given to some but not all patients. A brief metastasis-free survival (p less than 0.000001), and factors associated with electing pre-relapse chemotherapy (p less than 0.000001) were associated with shortened post-relapse survival, while post-relapse therapy (chemo p less than 0.0001, and hormonal p less than 0.00001, replacing chemotherapy in the model) apparently increased post-relapse survival in the group overall. This result was similar in the inoperable patient group [with inflammatory breast carcinoma an additional risk factor (p less than 0.0005)], as well as the operable group. However, in the operable group, when the pathologic criteria of histologic grade and nodal status were introduced into the analysis, post-relapse therapy was not seen to be an important factor for survival in any subgroup.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
进行了一项多变量分析,以评估复发后全身治疗对一系列转移性乳腺癌患者的影响。这些患者初次就诊时无可检测到的转移灶(M0),年龄小于或等于70岁,表现为单侧局限性疾病且无其他相关恶性肿瘤,于1965年至1984年间接受原发性疾病的连续方案治疗,随后发生远处转移。分析的所有760例患者均出现至少一处转移灶复发,且未根据任何特定方案进行选择标准的回顾性研究。所有患者均记录了绝经、分期、临床肿瘤侵袭性(PEV)、初始化疗或激素治疗以及复发时间的临床数据,并且在我们中心进行持续随访,部分但并非所有患者接受了挽救性化疗和/或激素治疗。无转移生存期短暂(p<0.000001)以及与选择复发前化疗相关的因素(p<0.000001)与复发后生存期缩短相关,而复发后治疗(化疗p<0.0001,激素治疗p<0.00001,在模型中替代化疗)总体上明显增加了该组的复发后生存期。在不可手术患者组[炎性乳腺癌是一个额外的危险因素(p<0.0005)]以及可手术组中,结果相似。然而,在可手术组中,当将组织学分级和淋巴结状态的病理标准纳入分析时,复发后治疗在任何亚组中均未被视为生存的重要因素。(摘要截断于250字)