• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The role of chief executive officers in a quality improvement : a qualitative study.首席执行官在质量改进中的作用:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 3;3(1):e001731. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001731.
2
Medical engagement in organisation-wide safety and quality-improvement programmes: experience in the UK Safer Patients Initiative.医疗机构参与全组织范围的安全与质量改进项目:英国“更安全患者倡议”的经验
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e44. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.036368. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
3
Strategies for sustaining a quality improvement collaborative and its patient safety gains.维持质量改进协作及其患者安全收益的策略。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):380-90. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs030. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
4
Predictors of the perceived impact of a patient safety collaborative: an exploratory study.预测患者安全合作的感知影响因素:一项探索性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Apr;23(2):173-81. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq089. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
5
Perceptions of the impact of a large-scale collaborative improvement programme: experience in the UK Safer Patients Initiative.对一项大规模协作改进计划影响的认知:英国患者安全倡议的经验
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Jun;15(3):524-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01145.x.
6
The disparity of frontline clinical staff and managers' perceptions of a quality and patient safety initiative.一线临床工作人员和管理人员对一项质量和患者安全倡议的看法存在差异。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1184-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01506.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
7
Victorian public healthcare Chief Executive Officers' views on renewable energy supply.维多利亚州公共医疗保健首席执行官对可再生能源供应的看法。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Feb;45(1):7-11. doi: 10.1071/AH20248.
8
Turnover factors and retention strategies for chief executive officers in Australian hospitals.澳大利亚医院首席执行官的更替因素与留任策略
Aust Health Rev. 2024 Aug 19. doi: 10.1071/AH24185.
9
A Board Level Intervention to Develop Organisation-Wide Quality Improvement Strategies: Cost-Consequences Analysis in 15 Healthcare Organisations.委员会层面的干预措施:制定全组织质量改进策略——15 家医疗机构的成本-效益分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):173-182. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.91.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing a behavioral nudge on healthcare leaders' intentions to implement evidence-based practices.评估行为推动对医疗保健领导者实施基于证据的实践的意愿。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 22;19(11):e0311442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311442. eCollection 2024.
2
Decision-maker roles in healthcare quality improvement projects: a scoping review.决策者在医疗质量改进项目中的角色:范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 4;13(1):e002522. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002522.
3
[Walkrounds: Do this improve safety culture of clinicians and managers? Cross-sectional study at Primary Care setting].[巡诊:这是否能改善临床医生和管理人员的安全文化?基层医疗环境中的横断面研究]
Aten Primaria. 2023 Nov;55(11):102733. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102733. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Staying ahead of the curve: avigating changes and maintaining gains in patient safety culture - a mixed-methods study.保持领先地位:在患者安全文化方面应对变化和维持成果——一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 4;11(3):e044116. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044116.
5
The impact of patient safety culture and the leader coaching behaviour of nurses on the intention to report errors: a cross-sectional survey.患者安全文化及护士领导指导行为对错误报告意愿的影响:一项横断面调查
BMC Nurs. 2020 Sep 21;19:89. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00472-4. eCollection 2020.
6
Safety Culture at Primary Healthcare Level: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Employees with a Leadership Role.基层医疗保健层面的安全文化:一项针对担任领导职务员工的横断面研究
Zdr Varst. 2019 Dec 13;59(1):42-46. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2020-0006. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
Overcoming Barriers to Adopting and Implementing Pharmacotherapy: the Medication Research Partnership.克服药物治疗采用与实施的障碍:药物研究合作项目
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;46(2):330-339. doi: 10.1007/s11414-018-9616-9.
8
Beyond clinical engagement: a pragmatic model for quality improvement interventions, aligning clinical and managerial priorities.超越临床参与:一种用于质量改进干预的实用模型,使临床和管理重点保持一致。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Sep;25(9):716-25. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004453. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
9
Successful Organizational Strategies to Sustain Use of A-CHESS: A Mobile Intervention for Individuals With Alcohol Use Disorders.维持使用A-CHESS的成功组织策略:一项针对酒精使用障碍个体的移动干预措施
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 18;17(8):e201. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3965.
10
Family care map: Sustaining family-centered care in Polytrauma Rehabilitation Centers.家庭护理地图:在多创伤康复中心维持以家庭为中心的护理
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(8):1311-24. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.03.0066.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for sustaining a quality improvement collaborative and its patient safety gains.维持质量改进协作及其患者安全收益的策略。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):380-90. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs030. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
2
Factors predicting change in hospital safety climate and capability in a multi-site patient safety collaborative: a longitudinal survey study.多地点患者安全合作组织中预测医院安全氛围和能力变化的因素:一项纵向调查研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):559-68. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000286. Epub 2012 May 5.
3
A framework for engaging physicians in quality and safety.一个使医生参与质量和安全工作的框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Sep;21(9):722-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000167. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
4
Can we save money by improving quality?我们能否通过提高质量来省钱?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):293-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.050237. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
5
Multiple component patient safety intervention in English hospitals: controlled evaluation of second phase.英文医院多环节患者安全干预措施:第二阶段对照评估
BMJ. 2011 Feb 3;342:d199. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d199.
6
The disparity of frontline clinical staff and managers' perceptions of a quality and patient safety initiative.一线临床工作人员和管理人员对一项质量和患者安全倡议的看法存在差异。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Dec;17(6):1184-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01506.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
7
Multilayered approach to patient safety culture.患者安全文化的多层方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e20. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029793. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
8
Medical engagement in organisation-wide safety and quality-improvement programmes: experience in the UK Safer Patients Initiative.医疗机构参与全组织范围的安全与质量改进项目:英国“更安全患者倡议”的经验
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct;19(5):e44. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.036368. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
9
Organisational readiness: exploring the preconditions for success in organisation-wide patient safety improvement programmes.组织准备情况:探索全组织范围内患者安全改进计划成功的先决条件。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19(4):313-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.030759. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
10
After the collaborative is over: what sustains quality improvement initiatives in primary care practices?合作结束后:是什么维持了初级保健实践中的质量改进举措?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Oct;35(10):502-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35069-2.

首席执行官在质量改进中的作用:一项定性研究。

The role of chief executive officers in a quality improvement : a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 3;3(1):e001731. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001731.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001731
PMID:23293245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3549256/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the critical dimensions of hospital Chief Executive Officers' (CEOs) involvement in a quality and safety and to offer practical guidance to assist CEOs to fulfil their leadership role in quality improvement (QI).

DESIGN

Qualitative interview study.

SETTING

20 organisations participating in the main phase of the Safer Patients Initiative (SPI) programme across the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

17 CEOs overseeing 19 organisations participating in the main phase of the SPI programme and 36 staff (20 workstream leads, 10 coordinators and 6 managers) involved in SPI across all 20 participating organisations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Self-reported perceptions of CEOs on their contribution and involvement within the SPI programme, supplemented by staff peer-reports.

RESULTS

The CEOs recognised the importance of their part in the SPI programme and gave detailed accounts of the perceived value that their involvement had brought at all stages of the process. In exploring the parts played by the CEOs, five dimensions were identified: (1) resource provision; (2) staff motivation and engagement; (3) commitment and support; (4) monitoring progress and (5) embedding programme elements. Staff reports confirmed these dimensions; however, the weighting of the dimensions differed. The findings stress the importance of particular actions of support and monitoring such as constant communication through leadership walk rounds and reviewing programme progress and its related clinical outcomes at Board meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

This study addressed the call for more research-informed practical guidance on the role of senior management in QI s. The findings show that the CEOs provided key participation considered to significantly contribute towards the SPI programme. CEOs and staff identified a number of clear and consistent themes essential to organisation safety improvement. Queries raised include the tangible benefits of executive involvement in changing structures and embedding for sustainability and the practical steps to creating the 'right' environment for QI.

摘要

目的

确定医院首席执行官(CEO)参与质量和安全的关键维度,并提供实用指导,以帮助 CEO 发挥其在质量改进(QI)方面的领导作用。

设计

定性访谈研究。

设置

英国 20 个参与 Safer Patients Initiative(SPI)计划主要阶段的组织。

参与者

17 名监督参与 SPI 计划主要阶段的 19 个组织的 CEO 以及 36 名员工(20 名工作流负责人、10 名协调员和 6 名经理),他们在所有 20 个参与组织中都参与了 SPI。

主要结果测量

CEO 对其在 SPI 计划中的贡献和参与的自我报告认知,辅以员工同行报告。

结果

CEO 们认识到他们在 SPI 计划中的重要作用,并详细描述了他们参与各个阶段所带来的感知价值。在探索 CEO 所扮演的角色时,确定了五个维度:(1)资源提供;(2)员工激励和参与;(3)承诺和支持;(4)监测进展;(5)嵌入计划要素。员工报告证实了这些维度;然而,维度的权重不同。研究结果强调了支持和监测等特定行动的重要性,例如通过领导巡视进行持续沟通,以及在董事会会议上审查计划进展及其相关临床结果。

结论

本研究回应了关于高级管理层在 QI 中的作用的更多基于研究的实用指导的呼吁。研究结果表明,CEO 提供了被认为对 SPI 计划有重大贡献的关键参与。CEO 和员工确定了一些明确和一致的主题,这些主题对组织安全改进至关重要。提出的问题包括高管参与改变结构和为可持续性嵌入的实际收益,以及为 QI 创建“正确”环境的实际步骤。