Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia 20057, USA.
Brain Connect. 2013;3(2):99-120. doi: 10.1089/brain.2012.0110.
We reviewed the extant literature with the goal of assessing the extent to which resting-state functional connectivity is associated with phenotypic variability in healthy and disordered populations. A large corpus of work has accumulated to date (125 studies), supporting the association between intrinsic functional connectivity and individual differences in a wide range of domains-not only in cognitive, perceptual, motoric, and linguistic performance, but also in behavioral traits (e.g., impulsiveness, risky decision making, personality, and empathy) and states (e.g., anxiety and psychiatric symptoms) that are distinguished by cognitive and affective functioning, and in neurological conditions with cognitive and motor sequelae. Further, intrinsic functional connectivity is sensitive to remote (e.g., early-life stress) and enduring (e.g., duration of symptoms) life experience, and it exhibits plasticity in response to recent experience (e.g., learning and adaptation) and pharmacological treatment. The most pervasive associations were observed with the default network; associations were also widespread between the cingulo-opercular network and both cognitive and affective behaviors, while the frontoparietal network was associated primarily with cognitive functions. Associations of somatomotor, frontotemporal, auditory, and amygdala networks were relatively restricted to the behaviors linked to their respective putative functions. Surprisingly, visual network associations went beyond visual function to include a variety of behavioral traits distinguished by affective function. Together, the reviewed evidence sets the stage for testing causal hypothesis about the functional role of intrinsic connectivity and augments its potential as a biomarker for healthy and disordered brain function.
我们回顾了现有的文献,旨在评估静息态功能连接与健康和障碍人群中表型变异性的关联程度。迄今为止,已经积累了大量的工作(125 项研究),支持内在功能连接与广泛领域的个体差异之间的关联,不仅在认知、感知、运动和语言表现方面,而且在行为特征(如冲动性、冒险决策、个性和同理心)和状态(如焦虑和精神症状)方面,这些特征与认知和情感功能区分开来,以及具有认知和运动后遗症的神经疾病方面。此外,内在功能连接对远程(如早期生活压力)和持久(如症状持续时间)的生活经历敏感,并且对最近的经历(如学习和适应)和药物治疗具有可塑性。与默认网络观察到最普遍的关联;扣带前回网络与认知和情感行为之间也存在广泛的关联,而额顶叶网络主要与认知功能相关。躯体运动、额颞叶、听觉和杏仁核网络的关联相对局限于与其各自假定功能相关的行为。令人惊讶的是,视觉网络的关联超出了视觉功能,包括各种由情感功能区分的行为特征。综上所述,审查的证据为测试内在连接的功能作用的因果假设奠定了基础,并增强了其作为健康和障碍大脑功能的生物标志物的潜力。