College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, 414 St. Andrew's College, 1121 College Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W3, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 9;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-17.
The effectiveness of paraprofessional home-visitations on improving the circumstances of disadvantaged families is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the effectiveness of paraprofessional home-visiting programs on developmental and health outcomes of young children from disadvantaged families.
A comprehensive search of electronic databases (e.g., CINAHL PLUS, Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE) from 1990 through May 2012 was supplemented by reference lists to search for relevant studies. Through the use of reliable tools, studies were assessed in duplicate. English language studies of paraprofessional home-visiting programs assessing specific outcomes for children (0-6 years) from disadvantaged families were eligible for inclusion in the review. Data extraction included the characteristics of the participants, intervention, outcomes and quality of the studies.
Studies that scored 13 or greater out of a total of 15 on the validity tool (n = 21) are the focus of this review. All studies are randomized controlled trials and most were conducted in the United States. Significant improvements to the development and health of young children as a result of a home-visiting program are noted for particular groups. These include: (a) prevention of child abuse in some cases, particularly when the intervention is initiated prenatally; (b) developmental benefits in relation to cognition and problem behaviours, and less consistently with language skills; and (c) reduced incidence of low birth weights and health problems in older children, and increased incidence of appropriate weight gain in early childhood. However, overall home-visiting programs are limited in improving the lives of socially high-risk children who live in disadvantaged families.
Home visitation by paraprofessionals is an intervention that holds promise for socially high-risk families with young children. Initiating the intervention prenatally and increasing the number of visits improves development and health outcomes for particular groups of children. Future studies should consider what dose of the intervention is most beneficial and address retention issues.
家庭环境不利的情况下,准专业人士家访对改善情况的效果并不明确。本文旨在系统地综述准专业人士家访方案对处境不利家庭的幼儿发展和健康结果的影响。
从 1990 年到 2012 年 5 月,我们全面检索了电子数据库(例如 CINAHL PLUS、Cochrane、EMBASE、MEDLINE),并查阅了参考文献,以寻找相关研究。我们使用可靠的工具对研究进行了重复评估。本综述纳入了评估处境不利家庭儿童(0-6 岁)特定结果的准专业人士家访方案的英语语言研究。数据提取包括参与者、干预、结果和研究质量的特征。
共有 21 项研究(总分 15 分,得分 13 分及以上)符合有效性工具的评分标准,是本综述的重点。所有研究均为随机对照试验,且多数在美国开展。特别对某些群体而言,家访方案对幼儿的发育和健康有显著的改善。这些改善包括:(a)预防某些情况下的儿童虐待,尤其是在产前启动干预时;(b)认知和行为问题方面的发育益处,但语言技能方面则不一致;(c)降低大龄儿童低出生体重和健康问题的发生率,增加幼儿期适当体重增加的发生率。然而,总体而言,家访方案对生活在不利家庭中的社会高危儿童的生活改善效果有限。
准专业人士家访是一种有前途的干预措施,适用于有年幼子女的社会高危家庭。在产前启动干预并增加家访次数可以改善特定群体儿童的发育和健康结果。未来的研究应考虑哪种剂量的干预最有益,并解决保留问题。