Dickel M J, Mosko S S
University of California Irvine Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Orange 92668.
Sleep. 1990 Apr;13(2):155-66. doi: 10.1093/sleep/13.2.155.
Despite its widespread use, the validity of the 5/h morbidity cut-off for the Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) or the Movement Index (MI) in determining presence of sleep apnea (SA) or sleep-related periodic leg movements (PLMs), respectively, has not been determined for any aged population. One hundred community resident seniors 60 years of age or older underwent three consecutive nights of polysomnography and also completed conventional measures of subjective sleep-wake complaints (written sleep questionnaire, sleep log, sleep interview) and mood disturbances (Zung Self-Rating Depression and Anxiety Scales, Profile of Mood States, Beck Depression Inventory). Based on the 5/h cut-off, 34% had SA and 58% had PLMs. Despite this, the frequency of subjective sleep-wake and mood disturbance was low across methods of assessment. Groups formed by the 5/h cut-off for RDI or MI failed to differ significantly in responses on all subjective sleep-wake and mood measures. Higher cut-offs also were examined and proved weak or ineffective in predicting subjective sleep-wake and mood disturbance. Preliminary investigations suggested that alternative measures of severity of SA (means oxygen desaturation and means duration of apneas or hypopneas) may be better predictors of subjective disturbance than RDI in this population. These findings both (a) demonstrate that the polygraphically identified SA and PLMs which are widespread in seniors tend not to be manifested in self-reported sleep-wake or mood disturbance, and (b) illustrate the need for validated morbidity cut-offs for SA and PLMs.
尽管呼吸紊乱指数(RDI)或运动指数(MI)的5次/小时发病率临界值在广泛使用,但对于任何年龄段人群,分别用于确定睡眠呼吸暂停(SA)或睡眠相关周期性腿部运动(PLMs)是否存在时的有效性尚未确定。100名60岁及以上的社区老年居民连续三晚接受了多导睡眠监测,并完成了主观睡眠 - 觉醒主诉(书面睡眠问卷、睡眠日志、睡眠访谈)和情绪障碍(zung自评抑郁和焦虑量表、情绪状态剖面图、贝克抑郁量表)的常规测量。基于5次/小时的临界值,34%的人患有SA,58%的人患有PLMs。尽管如此,在各种评估方法中,主观睡眠 - 觉醒和情绪障碍的发生率较低。根据RDI或MI的5次/小时临界值分组,在所有主观睡眠 - 觉醒和情绪测量的反应上没有显著差异。还检查了更高的临界值,结果表明其在预测主观睡眠 - 觉醒和情绪障碍方面作用微弱或无效。初步调查表明,在该人群中,SA严重程度的替代指标(平均氧饱和度下降和呼吸暂停或低通气的平均持续时间)可能比RDI更能预测主观障碍。这些发现既(a)表明在老年人中广泛存在的通过多导睡眠图确定的SA和PLMs往往不会表现为自我报告的睡眠 - 觉醒或情绪障碍,(b)也说明了需要对SA和PLMs的发病率临界值进行验证。