• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法官如何判决酒驾罪犯:一项实验研究。

How judges sentence DUI offenders: an experimental study.

作者信息

Lange T J, Greene E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs 80933.

出版信息

Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1990;16(1-2):125-33. doi: 10.3109/00952999009001577.

DOI:10.3109/00952999009001577
PMID:2330933
Abstract

This study examined the impact of 1) a DUI offender's blood alcohol level at the time of arrest and 2) the number of prior drunken driving convictions on judges' sentencing patterns. These variables were manipulated using vignettes that were presented to all judges who sentence drunken drivers in Colorado. Judges were asked to determine appropriate amounts of jail time, fines, public service hours, and alcohol education course work. Results indicated that they gave more severe sentences to offenders with prior records and to those with higher blood alcohol levels. The effects were generally stronger for the first variable, prior record. These findings suggest that judges may perceive of and sentence repeat offenders differently than first-time offenders, regardless of the level of intoxication at arrest.

摘要

本研究考察了以下两个因素对法官量刑模式的影响

1)酒驾犯罪者被捕时的血液酒精含量,以及2)先前酒后驾车定罪的次数。通过向科罗拉多州所有对酒驾者量刑的法官展示一些短文来操纵这些变量。要求法官确定适当的监禁时间、罚款、社区服务时间以及酒精教育课程作业量。结果表明,他们对有前科的犯罪者以及血液酒精含量较高的犯罪者判处更严厉的刑罚。对于第一个变量,即前科,这种影响通常更强。这些发现表明,无论被捕时的醉酒程度如何,法官对惯犯的认知和量刑可能与初犯不同。

相似文献

1
How judges sentence DUI offenders: an experimental study.法官如何判决酒驾罪犯:一项实验研究。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1990;16(1-2):125-33. doi: 10.3109/00952999009001577.
2
Impact of the revision of DUI legislation in Alabama.阿拉巴马州酒驾立法修订的影响。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1988;14(1):97-108. doi: 10.3109/00952998809001538.
3
DUI Countermeasures: differences between court jail sentences and jail time actually served and available alternative sanctions in select California counties.酒后驾车对策:加利福尼亚部分县法院判决刑期与实际服刑时间的差异和可用替代制裁措施。
J Safety Res. 2014 Feb;48:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
4
Alcohol use and prior alcohol-related convictions as predictors of probation officer perceptions and sentencing.饮酒及先前与酒精相关的定罪作为缓刑监督官看法和量刑的预测因素。
Int J Addict. 1980 Nov;15(8):1271-7. doi: 10.3109/10826088009040098.
5
Personality traits and behaviors of alcohol-impaired drivers: a comparison of first and multiple offenders.酒精影响下驾驶者的人格特质与行为:初犯者与多次 offenders 的比较。(注:这里“offenders”直接保留英文,因为没有更准确对应的中文词汇,结合语境推测是指多次违法驾驶者之类的意思)
Addict Behav. 1992 Sep-Oct;17(5):407-14. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(92)90001-c.
6
[Some focal points for penalty apportionment and penalty suspension in the assessment of alcohol-related road traffic accidents].[酒精相关道路交通事故评估中处罚分配与处罚缓期执行的一些重点]
Blutalkohol. 1990 Jul;27(4):260-71.
7
Predictors of recidivism in DUIIs.酒后驾车再犯的预测因素。
J Stud Alcohol. 1988 Sep;49(5):443-9. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1988.49.443.
8
Mandated AA attendance for recidivist drinking drivers: ideology, organization, and California criminal justice practices.对屡犯酒后驾车者强制要求参加戒酒互助会:理念、组织及加利福尼亚州刑事司法实践
Addiction. 1994 Jul;89(7):859-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00989.x.
9
Relapse to driving under the influence (DUI): a review.酒后驾车复发情况综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Mar;26(2):179-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.11.006. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
10
[Statistical evaluation of 60,000 blood alcohol values from 1964 to 1983. III. Multiple convictions].[1964年至1983年60000个血液酒精值的统计评估。III. 多次定罪]
Blutalkohol. 1990 Jul;27(4):289-98.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of alcohol-impaired driving recidivism among first offenders and multiple offenders.初犯和多次违法者的酒后驾驶再犯风险。
Am J Public Health. 2010 May;100(5):919-24. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.154575. Epub 2009 Oct 21.