Suppr超能文献

血糖指数和负荷与冠心病事件的关联:前瞻性队列的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Associations of glycemic index and load with coronary heart disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohorts.

机构信息

Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Center, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e000752. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000752. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) have been associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in some but not all cohort studies. We therefore assessed the association of GI and GL with CHD risk in prospective cohorts.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (through April 5, 2012) and identified all prospective cohorts assessing associations of GI and GL with incidence of CHD. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) methodologies were used. Relative measures of risk, comparing the group with the highest exposure (mean GI of cohorts=84.4 GI units, range 79.9 to 91; mean GL of cohorts=224.8, range 166 to 270) to the reference group (mean GI=72.3 GI units, range 68.1 to 77; mean GL=135.4, range 83 to 176), were pooled using random-effects models, expressed as relative risk (RR) with heterogeneity assessed by χ(2) and quantified by I(2). Subgroups included sex and duration of follow-up. Ten studies (n=240 936) were eligible. Pooled analyses showed an increase in CHD risk for the highest GI quantile compared with the lowest, with RR=1.11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99 to 1.24) and for GL, RR=1.27 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.49), both with evidence of heterogeneity (I(2)>42%, P<0.07). Subgroup analyses revealed only a significant modification by sex, with the female cohorts showing significance for GI RR=1.26 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.41) and for GL RR=1.55 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.03).

CONCLUSIONS

High GI and GL diets were significantly associated with CHD events in women but not in men. Further studies are required to determine the relationship between GI and GL with CHD in men.

摘要

背景

血糖指数(GI)和血糖负荷(GL)与某些但不是所有队列研究中的冠心病(CHD)风险相关。因此,我们评估了 GI 和 GL 与前瞻性队列 CHD 风险的相关性。

方法和结果

我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL(截至 2012 年 4 月 5 日),并确定了所有评估 GI 和 GL 与 CHD 发生率相关性的前瞻性队列研究。使用观察性研究的荟萃分析流行病学(MOOSE)方法。使用随机效应模型对相对风险进行荟萃分析,比较暴露程度最高的组(队列的平均 GI=84.4 GI 单位,范围为 79.9 至 91;队列的平均 GL=224.8,范围为 166 至 270)与参考组(平均 GI=72.3 GI 单位,范围为 68.1 至 77;平均 GL=135.4,范围为 83 至 176),通过 χ(2) 评估异质性,并通过 I(2) 量化,结果表示为相对风险(RR)。亚组包括性别和随访时间。有 10 项研究(n=240936)符合条件。汇总分析显示,与最低 GI 分位数相比,最高 GI 分位数的 CHD 风险增加,RR=1.11(95%置信区间[CI]99 至 1.24),GL 的 RR=1.27(95% CI 1.09 至 1.49),两者均存在异质性(I(2)>42%,P<0.07)。亚组分析仅显示性别存在显著修饰作用,女性队列中 GI 的 RR=1.26(95% CI 1.12 至 1.41)和 GL 的 RR=1.55(95% CI 1.18 至 2.03)具有统计学意义。

结论

高 GI 和 GL 饮食与女性 CHD 事件显著相关,但与男性无关。需要进一步研究来确定 GI 和 GL 与男性 CHD 之间的关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f056/3541617/be8be2fd7272/jah386-1-e000752-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验