• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

形成一个群体:价值观趋同与新兴的工作群体身份认同。

Becoming a group: value convergence and emergent work group identities.

作者信息

Meeussen Loes, Delvaux Ellen, Phalet Karen

机构信息

University of Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(2):235-48. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12021. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.12021
PMID:23316715
Abstract

This study examines the process of group identity formation through social interaction in real-life work groups, with a focus on achievement values as content of work group identities. Extending research on social identity formation, we examined the process of value convergence as group members negotiate common group goals. Specifically, we predicted that work group members would influence each other's achievement values and that value convergence over time would underlie emergent work group identities and work group performance. Using a fully cross-lagged multilevel design with four repeated measures in 68 work groups, we find that group members' achievement values converge through mutual social influence. Moreover, multilevel polynomial regression analysis reveals that value convergence - rather than group members' initial value fit - longitudinally predicts work group identification and performance.

摘要

本研究考察了现实工作团队中通过社会互动形成群体认同的过程,重点关注作为工作团队认同内容的成就价值观。在扩展社会认同形成研究的基础上,我们考察了团队成员协商共同团队目标时的价值趋同过程。具体而言,我们预测工作团队成员会相互影响彼此的成就价值观,并且随着时间推移的价值趋同将构成新兴工作团队认同和工作团队绩效的基础。通过对68个工作团队进行四次重复测量的完全交叉滞后多层次设计,我们发现团队成员的成就价值观通过相互的社会影响而趋同。此外,多层次多项式回归分析表明,价值趋同——而非团队成员的初始价值契合度——在纵向层面上预测了工作团队认同和绩效。

相似文献

1
Becoming a group: value convergence and emergent work group identities.形成一个群体:价值观趋同与新兴的工作群体身份认同。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(2):235-48. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12021. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
2
Individuality and social influence in groups: inductive and deductive routes to group identity.群体中的个性与社会影响:群体认同的归纳与演绎路径
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Nov;89(5):747-63. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747.
3
Who Represents Our Group? The Effects of Prototype Content on Perceived Status Dispersion and Social Undermining.谁代表我们的群体?原型内容对感知地位分散和社会破坏的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Jun;43(6):814-827. doi: 10.1177/0146167217699581. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
4
Striving for success in outgroup settings: effects of contextually emphasizing ingroup dimensions on stigmatized group members' social identity and performance styles.在外群体环境中追求成功:情境性强调内群体维度对受污名化群体成员社会认同和表现风格的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):576-88. doi: 10.1177/0146167205283336.
5
Social identity shapes social valuation: evidence from prosocial behavior and vicarious reward.社会身份塑造社会价值:来自亲社会行为和替代性奖励的证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Aug 1;12(8):1219-1228. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx045.
6
Leadership: social identity and guiding from within.领导力:社会认同与内在引导。
Nurs Econ. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):296-8.
7
Ethnic diversity and value sharing: A longitudinal social network perspective on interactive group processes.民族多样性与价值共享:互动群体过程的纵向社会网络视角。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2018 Apr;57(2):428-447. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12237. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Members' needs, intragroup conflict, and group performance.成员需求、群体内冲突与群体绩效。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 May;99(3):437-50. doi: 10.1037/a0036363. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior.身份融合:极端群体行为中个人身份与社会身份的相互作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):995-1011. doi: 10.1037/a0013668.
10
Power in group contexts: the influence of group status on promotion and prevention decision making.群体情境中的权力:群体地位对促进和预防决策的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;52(2):238-54. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02063.x. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Adopting the visual perspective of a group member is influenced by implicit group averaging.采用群体成员的视觉视角会受到内隐群体平均的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2856-2865. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02531-2. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
2
Exploring the Functioning of Online Self-Organizations during Public Health Emergencies: Patterns and Mechanism.探索公共卫生突发事件中在线自组织的运作模式及机制
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):4012. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054012.
3
The polarizing effects of group discussion in a negative normative context: Integrating societal-, group-, and individual-level factors.
群体讨论在消极规范情境下的极化效应:整合社会、群体和个体层面的因素。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Jan;58(1):150-174. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12282. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
4
Are intertemporal preferences contagious? Evidence from collaborative decision making.跨期偏好具有传染性吗?来自合作决策的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jul;45(5):837-851. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0698-z.
5
Women (Do Not) Belong Here: Gender-Work Identity Conflict among Female Police Officers.女性(不应)属于这里:女警官的性别与工作身份冲突
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 6;8:130. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00130. eCollection 2017.
6
Feel like you belong: on the bidirectional link between emotional fit and group identification in task groups.感觉自己有归属感:论任务型群体中情感契合与群体认同之间的双向联系。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 4;6:1106. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01106. eCollection 2015.