• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨期偏好具有传染性吗?来自合作决策的证据。

Are intertemporal preferences contagious? Evidence from collaborative decision making.

作者信息

Bixter Michael T, Trimber Elizabeth M, Luhmann Christian C

机构信息

School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2017 Jul;45(5):837-851. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0698-z.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-017-0698-z
PMID:28265901
Abstract

Prior research has provided substantial insight into individuals' intertemporal preferences (i.e., preferences about delayed rewards). In the present study, we instead investigated the preferences of small groups of individuals asked to express collective intertemporal decisions. The paradigm consisted of three phases. During the precollaboration and postcollaboration phases, participants completed an intertemporal decision task individually. During the collaboration phase, participants completed a similar task in small groups, reaching mutually-agreed-upon decisions. The results suggest that group preferences were systematically related to the mean of the group members' precollaboration preferences. In addition, collaborative decision making altered the group members' intertemporal preferences. Specifically, individuals' postcollaboration preferences converged toward the preferences of their respective groups. Furthermore, we found that individuals' postcollaboration preferences were independently related to both their precollaboration preferences and the preferences of the other group members, suggesting that individuals' postcollaboration preferences represented a revision of their precollaboration preferences based on the preferences observed in other group members. In Experiment 2, we demonstrated that similar patterns of results were found whether participants were making matching judgments or binary choices.

摘要

先前的研究已经对个体的跨期偏好(即对延迟奖励的偏好)提供了大量的见解。在本研究中,我们转而调查了被要求做出集体跨期决策的小群体个体的偏好。该范式包括三个阶段。在合作前和合作后阶段,参与者分别完成一项跨期决策任务。在合作阶段,参与者以小组形式完成一项类似的任务,达成共同商定的决策。结果表明,群体偏好与群体成员合作前偏好的平均值存在系统关联。此外,合作决策改变了群体成员的跨期偏好。具体而言,个体在合作后的偏好趋向于各自群体的偏好。此外,我们发现个体在合作后的偏好既独立于他们合作前的偏好,也独立于其他群体成员的偏好,这表明个体在合作后的偏好代表了他们基于在其他群体成员中观察到的偏好对合作前偏好的修正。在实验2中,我们证明了无论参与者是进行匹配判断还是二元选择,都能发现类似的结果模式。

相似文献

1
Are intertemporal preferences contagious? Evidence from collaborative decision making.跨期偏好具有传染性吗?来自合作决策的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jul;45(5):837-851. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0698-z.
2
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.吸引力效应调节奖励预测误差和跨期选择。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016.
3
Increased delayed reward during intertemporal decision-making in schizophrenic patients and their unaffected siblings.精神分裂症患者及其未受影响的兄弟姐妹在跨期决策中延迟奖励的增加。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.040. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
4
Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions.个体和对偶决策以及规范参照对延迟折扣决策的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 28;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00422-5.
5
Does sadness bring myopia: an intertemporal choice experiment with college students.悲伤会导致近视吗:一项针对大学生的跨期选择实验
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 26;15:1345951. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1345951. eCollection 2024.
6
Reward processing and intertemporal decision making in adults and adolescents: the role of impulsivity and decision consistency.奖励加工和成年人及青少年的跨期决策:冲动性和决策一致性的作用。
Brain Res. 2012 Oct 10;1478:36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.08.034. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
7
Decoy effects in intertemporal and probabilistic choices the role of time pressure, immediacy, and certainty.跨期和概率选择中的诱饵效应:时间压力、即时性和确定性的作用
Behav Processes. 2019 May;162:130-141. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
8
Now or not-now? The influence of alexithymia on intertemporal decision-making.现在还是非现在?述情障碍对跨期决策的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Jun;114:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
9
Pattern classification differentiates decision of intertemporal choices using multi-voxel pattern analysis.模式分类使用多体素模式分析来区分跨期选择的决策。
Cortex. 2019 Feb;111:183-195. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
10
Intertemporal choice--toward an integrative framework.跨期选择——迈向一个综合框架。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov;11(11):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Group Intertemporal Decision-Making Process.群体跨期决策过程。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;14(9):815. doi: 10.3390/bs14090815.
2
Effects of individual and dyadic decision-making and normative reference on delay discounting decisions.个体和对偶决策以及规范参照对延迟折扣决策的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Jul 28;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00422-5.
3
Better together? Social distance affects joint probability discounting.更紧密的关系?社交距离会影响共同概率折扣。

本文引用的文献

1
What do I want and when do I want it: brain correlates of decisions made for self and other.我想要什么,以及我什么时候想要:自我和他人决策的大脑关联。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 22;8(8):e73531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073531. eCollection 2013.
2
Now for Me, Later for Us? Effects of Group Context on Temporal Discounting.现在为我,以后为我们?群体背景对时间折扣的影响。
J Behav Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 1;26(2):118-127. doi: 10.1002/bdm.766.
3
Normative arguments from experts and peers reduce delay discounting.来自专家和同行的规范性论据会减少延迟折扣。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1513-1529. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01290-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
The social contagion of temporal discounting in small social networks.小社交网络中时间折扣的社会传染。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Mar 3;6(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00249-y.
5
Underlying Principles of a Covid-19 Behavioral Vaccine for a Sustainable Cultural Change.Covid-19 行为疫苗的基本原则:实现可持续文化变革。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 4;17(23):9066. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239066.
Judgm Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 1;7(5):568-589.
4
Becoming a group: value convergence and emergent work group identities.形成一个群体:价值观趋同与新兴的工作群体身份认同。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(2):235-48. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12021. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
5
Decisions for others become less impulsive the further away they are on the family tree.离家族树越远,为他人做决定就越不冲动。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049479. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
6
Behavioral variability of choices versus structural inconsistency of preferences.选择的行为可变性与偏好的结构不一致性。
Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):408-16. doi: 10.1037/a0027372.
7
Delay discounting decreases in those completing treatment for opioid dependence.完成阿片类药物依赖治疗的人,其延迟折扣减少。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Aug;20(4):302-9. doi: 10.1037/a0027391. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
8
Delay discounting: trait variable?延迟折扣:特质变量?
Behav Processes. 2011 May;87(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Mar 6.
9
Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts.铭记未来:工作记忆训练可减少兴奋剂成瘾者的延迟折扣。
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Feb 1;69(3):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.08.017. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
10
A money management-based substance use treatment increases valuation of future rewards.基于金钱管理的物质使用治疗增加了对未来奖励的评估。
Addict Behav. 2011 Jan-Feb;36(1-2):125-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.014. Epub 2010 Aug 11.