• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

留意差距?风险选择中的描述、体验和不确定性连续体。

Mind the gap? Description, experience, and the continuum of uncertainty in risky choice.

机构信息

Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Prog Brain Res. 2013;202:55-71. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00004-6.

DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00004-6
PMID:23317826
Abstract

The description-experience "gap" refers to the observation that choices are influenced by whether information about potential alternatives is learnt from a summary description or from the experience of sequentially sampling individual outcomes. In this chapter, we traverse the cognitive steps required to make a decision-information acquisition, storage, representation, and then choice-and at each step briefly review the evidence for sources of discrepancy between these two formats of choice. We conclude that description- and experience-based choice formats lie along a continuum of uncertainty and share important core features, including the explicit representation of probability, the combining of this probability information with outcome information, and utility maximization. The implication of this conclusion is that the differences between description- and experience-based choices emerge from how uncertainty information is acquired and stored rather than how it is represented or used.

摘要

描述-体验“差距”是指这样一种观察结果,即选择会受到关于潜在替代方案的信息是通过总结性描述学习还是通过逐个采样个体结果的经验学习的影响。在本章中,我们遍历了做出决策所需的认知步骤——信息获取、存储、表示,然后是选择——并在每个步骤简要回顾了这两种选择格式之间存在差异的来源的证据。我们的结论是,基于描述和基于经验的选择格式沿着不确定性的连续体排列,并具有一些重要的核心特征,包括概率的明确表示、将这种概率信息与结果信息相结合,以及效用最大化。这一结论的含义是,描述和基于经验的选择之间的差异源自不确定性信息的获取和存储方式,而不是其表示或使用方式。

相似文献

1
Mind the gap? Description, experience, and the continuum of uncertainty in risky choice.留意差距?风险选择中的描述、体验和不确定性连续体。
Prog Brain Res. 2013;202:55-71. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00004-6.
2
The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice.反向的描述-体验差距:厘清风险选择中呈现格式效应的来源。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Apr;145(4):486-508. doi: 10.1037/a0040103.
3
Description- and experience-based choice: does equivalent information equal equivalent choice?基于描述和经验的选择:等效信息就等于等效选择吗?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):276-84. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.007. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
4
Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice.基于经验的决策以及罕见事件在风险选择中的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):534-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x.
5
The description-experience gap in risky choice.风险选择中的描述-体验差距。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Dec;13(12):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
6
Verbal behavior and risky choice in humans: Exploring the boundaries of the description-experience gap.人类的言语行为与风险选择:探索描述-体验差距的边界
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:301-308. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
7
The long and short of it: closing the description-experience "gap" by taking the long-run view.长话短说:从长远角度出发,弥合描述-体验“差距”。
Cognition. 2013 Jan;126(1):54-71. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
8
What the Future Holds and When: A Description-Experience Gap in Intertemporal Choice.未来何时到来:跨期选择中的描述-体验差距。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Aug;30(8):1218-1233. doi: 10.1177/0956797619858969. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
When does information about probability count in choices under risk?关于概率的信息在风险决策中何时起作用?
Risk Anal. 2006 Dec;26(6):1623-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00847.x.
10
Banking on a bad bet. Probability matching in risky choice is linked to expectation generation.孤注一掷。风险选择中的概率匹配与期望生成有关。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):707-11. doi: 10.1177/0956797611407933. Epub 2011 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Causal inference and cognitive-behavioral integration deficits drive stable variation in human punishment sensitivity.因果推断和认知行为整合缺陷导致人类惩罚敏感性的稳定差异。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 9;3(1):103. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00284-9.
2
Family socio-economic status and parental education anxiety: the mediating role of perception of the "double reduction" policy and the moderating role of parental education expectations.家庭社会经济地位与家长教育焦虑:“双减”政策认知的中介作用及家长教育期望的调节作用
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 2;16:1525651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1525651. eCollection 2025.
3
Probabilistic Representation Differences between Decisions from Description and Decisions from Experience.
基于描述的决策与基于经验的决策之间的概率表征差异。
J Intell. 2024 Sep 20;12(9):89. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12090089.
4
Aberrant decision-making as a risk factor for falls in aging.异常决策作为衰老过程中跌倒的一个风险因素。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Jun 24;16:1384242. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1384242. eCollection 2024.
5
Impact of consumer information capability on green consumption intention: the role of green trust and media publicity.消费者信息能力对绿色消费意愿的影响:绿色信任与媒体宣传的作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1247479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1247479. eCollection 2023.
6
Outcome uncertainty influences probability perception and risk attitudes.结果的不确定性会影响概率感知和风险态度。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Oct 6;8(10):210307. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210307. eCollection 2021 Oct.
7
Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.青少年总是比成年人更冒险吗?一项基于被试内设计的研究,探讨了决策和加工过程中的情境效应。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0255102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255102. eCollection 2021.
8
An asymmetry of treatment between lotteries involving gains and losses in rhesus monkeys.恒河猴在涉及收益和损失的彩票游戏中存在治疗的不对称性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 18;9(1):10441. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46975-2.
9
Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference.三个差距及其对风险偏好的可能意义。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 18;374(1766):20180140. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0140.
10
On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.猴子基本风险态度的灵活性
J Neurosci. 2018 May 2;38(18):4383-4398. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2260-17.2018. Epub 2018 Apr 6.