• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助与腹腔镜胃旁路术:短期结果比较。

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short-term outcomes.

机构信息

The Reading Hospital and Medical Center, Sixth Avenue and Spruce Street, P.O. Box 16052, West Reading, PA 19611, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2013 Apr;23(4):467-73. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0848-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-012-0848-0
PMID:23318944
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is an effective treatment for severe obesity and obesity-related comorbidities. Presently, gastric bypass is performed most often laparoscopically, although a robotic-assisted procedure is the preferred approach for an increasing number of bariatric surgeons.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared the results of 100 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass operations using the da Vinci robot and 100 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses performed laparoscopically. Short-term outcomes were determined by evaluating mortality, length of stay, length of operation, return to the operating room within 90 days of operation, conversions to open procedure, leaks, strictures, transfusions, and hospital readmissions.

RESULTS

There was no mortality, pulmonary embolus, or conversion to open procedure in either group. Both the laparoscopic and robotic operative times decreased progressively, although the robotic operation time was longer (mean, 144 versus 87 min, P < 0.001). The length of stay was shorter for the robotic-assisted group (37 versus 52 h, P < 0.001), and 60% of these patients were discharged after one night's stay (P < 0.001). There were fewer transfusions (P = 0.005) and readmissions (P = .560) in the robotic group. The stricture rate was higher in the first 50 robotic procedures (17 mm gastrotomy) but resolved in the second 50 procedures (21 mm gastrotomy). There was no difference in the rate of leak and return to the operating room between groups (both P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be performed safely with robotic assistance, even during the first 100 cases.

摘要

背景

Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术是治疗严重肥胖症和肥胖相关合并症的有效方法。目前,胃旁路手术最常通过腹腔镜进行,尽管越来越多的减重外科医生更喜欢使用机器人辅助手术。

方法

本回顾性研究比较了使用达芬奇机器人进行的 100 例 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术和 100 例通过腹腔镜进行的腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术的结果。通过评估死亡率、住院时间、手术时间、手术后 90 天内返回手术室、转为开放手术、漏诊、狭窄、输血和住院再入院等情况来确定短期结果。

结果

两组均无死亡、肺栓塞或转为开放手术。腹腔镜和机器人手术时间均逐渐缩短,但机器人手术时间更长(平均 144 分钟对 87 分钟,P < 0.001)。机器人辅助组的住院时间更短(37 小时对 52 小时,P < 0.001),其中 60%的患者在住院一晚后出院(P < 0.001)。机器人组的输血(P = 0.005)和再入院(P =.560)次数更少。在前 50 例机器人手术中(17 毫米胃造口术),狭窄发生率较高,但在随后的 50 例手术中(21 毫米胃造口术)得到解决。两组之间的漏诊率和返回手术室率无差异(均 P > 0.05)。

结论

这些结果表明,即使在最初的 100 例手术中,机器人辅助也可以安全地进行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术。

相似文献

1
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short-term outcomes.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胃旁路术:短期结果比较。
Obes Surg. 2013 Apr;23(4):467-73. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0848-0.
2
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes?机器人辅助与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:结果有差异吗?
World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):637-42. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0938-x.
3
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective, single-center study of early perioperative outcomes at a community hospital.腹腔镜与机器人辅助Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:社区医院早期围手术期结局的回顾性单中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3792-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4675-y. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
4
Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.全机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术。
Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;140(8):779-86. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.8.779.
5
Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.机器人辅助胃空肠吻合术并不改善腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):597-603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1229-1. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
6
Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery?机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术在社区医院环境中的应用:减重手术的未来?
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3312-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1714-1. Epub 2011 May 26.
7
Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, is it Safer than Laparoscopic Bypass?机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术比腹腔镜胃旁路手术更安全吗?
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):1016-20. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1884-3.
8
Australian experience with robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with comparison to a conventional laparoscopic series.澳大利亚机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术的经验与传统腹腔镜系列的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4025-4031. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08723-4. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. the da Vinci Si Surgical System for Roux-En-Y gastric bypass.达芬奇 Xi 与达芬奇 Si 手术系统在 Roux-En-Y 胃旁路手术中的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Aug;404(5):615-620. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01803-z. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
10
Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study.腹腔镜与机器人辅助Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:来自一项大型前瞻性单中心研究的经验教训及长期随访结果
Obes Surg. 2014 Dec;24(12):2031-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1335-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Global benchmarks in primary robotic bariatric surgery redefine quality standards for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.全球机器人减重手术基准重新定义了 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术的质量标准。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad374.
2
Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with the novel platform Hugo RAS: preliminary experience in 15 patients.机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术联合新型 Hugo RAS 平台:15 例患者的初步经验。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jan;76(1):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01657-7. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
3
Controversial Role of Robot in Primary and Revisional Bariatric Surgery Procedures: Review of the Literature and Personal Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes.肥胖伴糖尿病患者的减肥手术与强化内科治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 26;366(17):1567-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200225. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
2
Early and late abdominal bleeding after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: sources and tailored therapeutic strategies.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后早晚期腹腔出血:出血来源及针对性治疗策略。
Obes Surg. 2011 Apr;21(4):413-20. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0354-9.
3
Robot-assisted hybrid laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: surgical technique and early outcomes.
机器人在减重手术初次及翻修手术中的争议性作用:文献综述与个人经验
Front Surg. 2022 May 31;9:916652. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916652. eCollection 2022.
4
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.机器人辅助与腹腔镜联合减重手术和食管裂孔疝修补术:使用 2015-2018 年 MBSAQIP 的倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6886-6895. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09027-x. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
5
Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人减重手术治疗肥胖症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2440-2456. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08283-z. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Robotic-Assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Learning Curve Assessment Using Cumulative Sum and Literature Review.机器人辅助Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:使用累积和法评估学习曲线并进行文献综述
Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2019 Sep 1;14(3):95-101. doi: 10.1089/bari.2018.0042. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.机器人辅助与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术:使用 2015-2016 MBSAQIP 数据库进行倾向评分匹配的比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1600-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6422-7. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
8
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2018 Nov;28(11):3691-3700. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3458-7.
9
Systematic review of operative outcomes of robotic surgical procedures performed with endoscopic linear staplers or robotic staplers.使用内镜直线缝合器或机器人缝合器进行机器人手术操作的手术结果的系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Feb;13(1):9-21. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0822-5. Epub 2018 May 9.
10
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜减肥手术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2016 Dec;26(12):3031-3044. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2408-5.
机器人辅助杂交腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术:手术技术与早期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Dec;20(10):847-50. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0261.
4
Gastrointestinal bleeding after gastric bypass surgery: nuisance or catastrophe?胃旁路手术后的胃肠道出血:麻烦还是灾难?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.07.016. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
5
Effect of staple height on gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass: a multicenter prospective randomized trial.钉高对腹腔镜胃旁路术胃空肠吻合术的影响:一项多中心前瞻性随机试验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Sep-Oct;6(5):477-82. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.03.294. Epub 2010 May 21.
6
Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.机器人辅助胃空肠吻合术并不改善腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):597-603. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1229-1. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
7
Understanding the significance, reasons and patterns of abnormal vital signs after gastric bypass for morbid obesity.理解病态肥胖胃旁路手术后异常生命体征的意义、原因和模式。
Obes Surg. 2011 Jun;21(6):707-13. doi: 10.1007/s11695-010-0221-0.
8
Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality.机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:将发病率和死亡率降至最低。
Obes Surg. 2010 Mar;20(3):265-70. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-0012-7. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
9
Standardization of the fully stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity reduces early immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality: a single center study on 2606 patients.全钉合腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的标准化可降低早期即刻术后发病率和死亡率:一项 2606 例患者的单中心研究。
Obes Surg. 2009 Oct;19(10):1355-64. doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9933-4. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
10
Primary laparoscopic gastric bypass can be performed safely in patients with BMI >or= 60.对于体重指数(BMI)≥60的患者,初次腹腔镜胃旁路手术可安全实施。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.020. Epub 2008 Dec 18.