Suppr超能文献

硬膜外美沙酮可产生剂量依赖性的癌痛缓解,硬膜外地塞米松可进一步增强其效果。

Epidural methadone results in dose-dependent analgesia in cancer pain, further enhanced by epidural dexamethasone.

机构信息

Teaching Hospital, Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of Members of the Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeirão Preto-São Paulo 14039 900, Brazil.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 5;108(2):259-64. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.593. Epub 2013 Jan 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the role of epidural methadone-lidocaine in cancer pain combined or not to epidural dexamethasone.

METHODS

In all, 72 cancer patients, 32- to 67-year-old were randomized to six groups (n=12) and prospectively studied to examine analgesia and adverse effects for 3 weeks. Patients received single-dose protocol epidural test drugs: Control group (CG) received epidural 40-mg lidocaine diluted to 10-ml volume with saline. Dexamethasone group (DG) 40-mg lidocaine plus 10-mg dexamethasone. The 2.5MetG 2.5-mg epidural methadone with 40-mg lidocaine; the 5MetG, 5-mg epidural methadone plus 40-mg lidocaine, the 7.5MetG, 7.5-mg epidural methadone plus 40-mg lidocaine and finally the 7.5Met-DexG, 7.5-mg methadone with 40-mg lidocaine and 10-mg dexamethasone.

RESULTS

Groups CG, DG and 2.5MetG were similar regarding analgesia and side effects. Patients from 5MetG and 7.5MetG took 3 ± 1 and 5 ± 1 days, respectively, to restart oral morphine. Patients from 7.5MetDG took 14 ± 2 to restart oral morphine (P<0.001). Daily somnolence and appetite improved in the 7.5MetDG during 2-week evaluation (P<0.005). Fatigue improved for both DG and 7.5MetDG during 2-week evaluation (P<0.005). By the third week of evaluation, all patients were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Epidural methadone plus lidocaine resulted in dose-dependent analgesia, further improved by epidural dexamethasone, which also improved fatigue.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估硬膜外吗啡-利多卡因在癌症疼痛中的作用,是否联合硬膜外地塞米松。

方法

72 例 32-67 岁的癌症患者随机分为 6 组(每组 12 例),前瞻性研究 3 周的镇痛效果和不良反应。患者接受单次硬膜外试验药物:对照组(CG)给予 40mg 利多卡因+10ml 生理盐水。地塞米松组(DG)给予 40mg 利多卡因+10mg 地塞米松。2.5MetG 给予 2.5mg 硬膜外吗啡+40mg 利多卡因;5MetG 给予 5mg 硬膜外吗啡+40mg 利多卡因;7.5MetG 给予 7.5mg 硬膜外吗啡+40mg 利多卡因;7.5Met-DexG 给予 7.5mg 吗啡+40mg 利多卡因+10mg 地塞米松。

结果

CG、DG 和 2.5MetG 组在镇痛和不良反应方面相似。5MetG 和 7.5MetG 组患者分别需要 3±1 天和 5±1 天才能重新开始口服吗啡。7.5Met-DexG 组患者需要 14±2 天才能重新开始口服吗啡(P<0.001)。在 2 周的评估中,7.5Met-DexG 组患者的日间嗜睡和食欲改善(P<0.005)。在 2 周的评估中,DG 和 7.5Met-DexG 组的疲劳均有改善(P<0.005)。到第 3 周评估时,所有患者均相似。

结论

硬膜外吗啡+利多卡因具有剂量依赖性镇痛作用,联合硬膜外地塞米松可进一步改善镇痛效果,并改善疲劳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/263c/3566815/98fd7762335c/bjc2012593f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验