• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison of two pairing procedures to establish praise as a reinforcer.两种配对程序建立赞扬作为强化物的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):721-35. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-721.
2
Evaluating functions of praise for children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder.评估表扬对自闭症谱系障碍儿童的作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024 Jul;57(3):584-598. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1079. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
Effects of neutral and enthusiastic praise on the rate of discrimination acquisition.中性与热情赞扬对辨别学习速率的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Apr;51(2):335-344. doi: 10.1002/jaba.440. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
4
Evaluation of a discrimination training procedure for establishing praise as a reinforcer.评价一种用于将表扬作为强化物的辨别训练程序。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024 Jul;57(3):776-783. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1071. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
5
Evaluating different values of effort and reinforcement parameters under concurrent- and single-operant arrangements.评估在并发和单项操作安排下不同努力值和强化值。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 May;52(2):516-533. doi: 10.1002/jaba.533. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
6
Temporal integration and instrumental conditioned reinforcement.时间整合与工具性条件强化。
Learn Behav. 2014 Sep;42(3):201-8. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0138-x.
7
A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.阳性条件强化综述。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5(4 Suppl):543-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543.
8
An evaluation of praise as a reinforcer for preschoolers' behavior.表扬作为一种强化物对学龄前儿童行为的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jan;53(1):315-330. doi: 10.1002/jaba.591. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Effect of signaled reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching-to-sample performance in individuals with intellectual disabilities.信号强化物大小对智力障碍个体延迟样本匹配表现的影响。
Behav Processes. 2013 Jun;96:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
10
Parametric analysis of delayed primary and conditioned reinforcers.延迟初级强化物和条件强化物的参数分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Sep;49(3):639-55. doi: 10.1002/jaba.311. Epub 2016 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Common Practices used to Establish and Implement Token Economies in Clinical and Instructional Settings: A Survey of BACB Certificants.在临床和教学环境中建立与实施代币制经济的常见做法:对BACB认证人员的一项调查
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 May 3;16(4):1151-1162. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00800-5. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Placebo hypoalgesia induced by operant conditioning: a comparative study on the effects of verbal, token-based, and social rewards and punishers.操作性条件作用诱导的安慰剂镇痛:言语、代币和社会奖惩效应的比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47482-1.
3
The Application of Relational Frame Theory to Teaching Early Piano Skills to Children on the Autism Spectrum.关系框架理论在自闭症谱系障碍儿童早期钢琴技能教学中的应用
Anal Verbal Behav. 2022 Nov 14;39(1):1-29. doi: 10.1007/s40616-022-00175-8. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Pavlovian learning and conditioned reinforcement.巴甫洛夫式学习和条件强化。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jun;56(3):498-519. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1004. Epub 2023 May 31.
5
Assessing the Effects of Observational Conditioning and Response-Contingent Pairing on the Vocalizations of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.评估观察性条件作用和反应依存配对对自闭症谱系障碍儿童发声的影响。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2021 Sep 9;37(2):194-216. doi: 10.1007/s40616-021-00157-2. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Adapting Direct Services for Telehealth: A Practical Tutorial.适应远程医疗的直接服务:实用教程。
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Oct 12;14(4):1010-1046. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00529-5. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
What's in a Click? The Efficacy of Conditioned Reinforcement in Applied Animal Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.点击意味着什么?条件性强化在应用动物训练中的效果:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;10(10):1757. doi: 10.3390/ani10101757.
8
Moving towards specificity: A systematic review of cue features associated with reward and punishment in anorexia nervosa.向特异性迈进:厌食症中与奖励和惩罚相关的线索特征的系统综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Jul;79:101872. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101872. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.刺激-刺激配对中的翻译:学习者发声的自动塑造
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Nov 25;43(1):57-103. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00228-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
Inducing Novel Vocalizations by Conditioning Speech Sounds as Reinforcers.通过将语音声音作为强化物进行条件作用来诱导新的发声。
Behav Anal Pract. 2015 Sep 3;8(2):223-232. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0088-6. eCollection 2015 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues.条件强化:实验与理论问题
Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;17(2):261-85. doi: 10.1007/BF03392675.
2
Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.条件强化值与改变阻力。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 May;89(3):263-98. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-263.
3
The effect of conditioned reinforcement rate on choice: a review.条件强化率对选择的影响:综述
J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 May;87(3):409-21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2007.44-06.
4
Do conditional reinforcers count?条件强化物算数吗?
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Nov;86(3):269-83. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.56-05.
5
Increasing mentally retarded adolescents' verbalizations about current events.提高智障青少年对时事的口头表达能力。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Winter;6(4):621-30. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-621.
6
Systematic reinforcement: academic performance of underachieving students.系统强化:提高学业不良学生的学习成绩。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Winter;4(4):311-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-311.
7
The effects of reinforcement on the modification, maintenance, and generalization of social responses of mental patients.强化对精神病人社会反应的修正、维持和泛化的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Winter;1(4):307-14. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-307.
8
Effects of candy and social reinforcement, instructions, and reinforcement schedule leaning on the modification and maintenance of smiling.糖果和社会强化、指令以及强化计划对微笑的改变和维持的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):121-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-121.
9
Effects of teacher attention on study behavior.教师关注对学习行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):1-12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-1.
10
Increasing pretend toy play of toddlers with disabilities in an inclusive setting.在包容性环境中增加残疾幼儿的假装游戏行为。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Summer;37(2):197-206; quiz 207. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-197.

两种配对程序建立赞扬作为强化物的比较。

A comparison of two pairing procedures to establish praise as a reinforcer.

机构信息

Applied Behavioral Science Department, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):721-35. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-721.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.2012.45-721
PMID:23322928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3545497/
Abstract

Some individuals with intellectual disabilities do not respond to praise as a reinforcer, which may limit their ability to learn. We evaluated 2 procedures (stimulus pairing and response-stimulus pairing), both of which involved pairing previously neutral praise statements with preferred edible items, to determine their usefulness in establishing praise as a reinforcer. Results of Study 1 indicated that stimulus pairing was not effective in conditioning praise as a reinforcer for 3 of 4 subjects; results were inconclusive for the 4th subject. Results of Study 2 indicated that response-stimulus pairing was effective in conditioning praise as a reinforcer for 4 of 8 subjects. After conditioning, praise also increased the occurrence of additional target responses for these 4 subjects.

摘要

一些智障人士对赞美作为强化物没有反应,这可能限制了他们的学习能力。我们评估了两种程序(刺激配对和反应-刺激配对),这两种程序都涉及将先前中性的表扬语句与喜欢的可食用物品配对,以确定它们在将表扬作为强化物建立起来的有用性。研究 1 的结果表明,刺激配对对 4 名被试中的 3 名没有效果;第 4 名被试的结果不确定。研究 2 的结果表明,反应-刺激配对对 8 名被试中的 4 名有效。在条件作用后,表扬也增加了这 4 名被试的其他目标反应的发生。