Lochhead Lois E, MacMillan Peter D
Community Health Science, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
Work. 2013 Jan 1;46(1):67-76. doi: 10.3233/WOR-121537.
The Oswestry disability index (ODI) is the most widely used measure of perceived disability for low back conditions. It has been adopted without adaptation in functional capacity evaluation (FCE). Rigorous testing of the ODI with modern psychometric methods, in this setting, is warranted.
To determine the psychometric properties of the ODI in FCE: unidimensionality; differential item functioning; item coverage and to identify poorly functioning items, allowing for improvement of these items and recalibration of the scale.
Rasch analysis, specifically Masters' partial credit model, was conducted on data.
133 work-disabled individuals presenting for FCE in northern British Columbia, Canada.
All items had one poorly functioning option. Items were rescaled from six categories to five, improving the psychometric properties of the ODI as a unidimensional (disability due to back pain) scale. Item difficulty range is sufficient for a population with mild to severe disability.
Although two of the ten ODI items functioned marginally unsatisfactorily in the unrevised state, the 5-option revised ODI appears superior. Use in clinical settings across a broad spectrum of disability levels could help establish its psychometric properties. Health professionals should be aware that the ODI may perform differently depending on client population.
奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)是评估下背部疾病导致的残疾感知情况时使用最广泛的指标。它在功能能力评估(FCE)中未经调整就被采用。在这种情况下,有必要用现代心理测量方法对ODI进行严格测试。
确定ODI在FCE中的心理测量特性:单维性;项目功能差异;项目覆盖范围,并识别功能不佳的项目,以便对这些项目进行改进并重新校准该量表。
对数据进行Rasch分析,具体采用马斯特斯部分计分模型。
加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省北部133名因工作致残而前来进行FCE的个体。
所有项目都有一个功能不佳的选项。项目从六个类别重新调整为五个类别,改善了ODI作为单维(因背痛导致的残疾)量表的心理测量特性。项目难度范围对于轻度至重度残疾人群来说是足够的。
虽然ODI的十个项目中有两个在未修订状态下功能略有不足,但修订后的五选项ODI似乎更优。在广泛的残疾水平的临床环境中使用有助于确定其心理测量特性。卫生专业人员应意识到,ODI的表现可能因客户群体而异。