Collins R J, Neil J C, Wilson R J
Department of Pathology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Australia.
J Clin Pathol. 1990 Mar;43(3):243-5. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.3.243.
The Kallestad Corporation recently suggested that their new buffer system for the nephelometric detection of rheumatoid factor conferred advantages over existing systems. Two rate nephelometric procedures, the Kallestad QM-300 and the Beckman ICS-II (RF), were therefore compared. Sera (n = 157) were selected on the basis of a previous ICS-II value. The results on the QM-300 of sera with an initial rheumatoid factor value of less than 400 IU identified two groups. Group 1 (n = 109) showed a good correlation with the ICS-II method while group 2 (n = 13) was highly discordant with the QM-300, producing significantly higher values. The values of 35 sera with an initial rheumatoid factor of greater than 400 IU were likewise highly discordant, with the QM-300 producing significantly lower values. Dilution recovery experiments implied that the Beckman buffer was likely to be contributory. As the formulae of the buffers remain proprietary, the reasons for the differences are speculative. The findings could be taken to indicate that the Kallestad value is a more accurate indicator of the quantity of rheumatoid factor than the Beckman value.
卡莱斯塔德公司最近提出,他们用于类风湿因子比浊检测的新型缓冲系统比现有系统具有优势。因此,对两种速率比浊法——卡莱斯塔德QM - 300和贝克曼ICS - II(RF)进行了比较。根据先前的ICS - II值选择了血清(n = 157)。初始类风湿因子值小于400 IU的血清在QM - 300上的检测结果分为两组。第1组(n = 109)与ICS - II方法显示出良好的相关性,而第2组(n = 13)与QM - 300高度不一致,产生的值显著更高。初始类风湿因子大于400 IU的35份血清的值同样高度不一致,QM - 300产生的值显著更低。稀释回收率实验表明贝克曼缓冲液可能是造成这种情况的原因。由于缓冲液的配方仍然保密,差异的原因只能是推测性的。这些发现可以表明,与贝克曼值相比,卡莱斯塔德值是类风湿因子数量更准确的指标。